11/22 http://www.lao.ca.gov/2000/calfacts/2000_calfacts_demographics.html
Proof that when the economy is good, more people fuck and
make babies. Recession=fewer babies, dot-com=lots of babies.
Human beings are like cockroaches. When you give them food,
they reproduce a lot.
\_ Umm, and this wasn't obvious? This is just a corollary of the
fact that people try to avoid spending money (babies cost a lot)
when they feel like they've got less of it.
\_ Only in the short term, in general, long term prosperity
produces lower birth rates.
\_ At current global growth rates, we'll have something like 40
billion people in 100 years, 15 trillion in 200 years ... The
growth party will eventually stop and if history is any guide
it's going to be "demand destruction" in the most painful sense
possible.
\_ Thomas Malthus... Paul Ehrlich... Anonymous MOTD poster...
Man, that's a rich tradition of accurate forecasting of
over-population doom and gloom.
\_ Actually famine and population decimation has been pretty
normal throughout all of history, including recent
times. Witness Darfur, Rwanda, etc.
\_ Don't worry, antibiotic/drug resistant AIDS, malaria, cholera,
tuberculosis, flu, pneumonia, etc., famine, and war will knock
down human populations well before the 40 billion mark. Hell,
we might have uncontrolled antibiotic-resistant pneumonic
plague, too.
\_ For humanitiy's sake, stop participating FightAIDS@home and
help reduce human population. Yeah, really!
\_ Do your population estimates take into account that as
economic conditions improve people become less fecund?
\_ This is where the "at current global growth rates" bit
kicks in.
\_ IOW, no. Thanks for playing.
\_ Something will stop the global growth rates,
but it won't be improving economic conditions. |