tinyurl.com/dhp8q -> www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1606
Apparently the USPTO has violated its rules and guidelines, patenting a device that defies the known laws of physics. Patent Number 6,960,975 was issued to Boris Volfson of Huntington, IN, wh erein the device is described: quote: A cooled hollow superconductive sh ield is energized by an electromagnetic field resulting in the quantized vortices of lattice ions projecting a gravitomagnetic field that forms a spacetime curvature anomaly outside the space vehicle.
That is, changing local curvature field at the ship in such a w ay as to shape the timelike geodesic, with small tidal geodesic deviatio n over the scale of the ship, as desired.
Vlad ------- UPI news: The journal Nature said patent 6,960,975 was granted Nov. One of the main theoretical arguments against anti-gravity is that it imp lies the availability of unlimited energy. "If you design an anti-gravity machine, you've got a perpetual-motion mac hine," Robert Park of the American Physical Society told Nature. Park said the action shows patent examiners are being duped by false scie nce. Copyright 2005 by United Press International --------- Bill Alek writes: "Abstract of US6960975 A space vehicle propelled by the pressure of inflationary vacuum state is provided comprising a hollow superconductive shield, an inner shield, a power source, a support structure, upper and lower means for generating an electromagnetic field, and a flux modulation controller.
By creating a spacetime curvature anomaly associated with low ered pressure of inflationary vacuum state around a space vehicle, with the lowest vacuum pressure density located directly in front of the vehi cle, a condition could be created where gravity associated with lowered vacuum pressure density pulls the vehicle forward in modified spacetime.
By creating a spacetime curvature anomaly associated with elevated pressure of inflationary vacuum state around the space vehicle, with th e point of highest vacuum pressure density located directly behind the v ehicle, a condition could be created where a repulsion force associated with elevated vacuum pressure density pushes the space vehicle forward i n modified spacetime.
it is clear that the increase in the vacuum pressure density could lead to a substantial increase in the light-speed. If the space vehicle is movin g in the anomaly where the local light-speed is higher than the light-sp eed of the ambient vacuum, and if this vehicle approaches this local lig ht-speed, the space vehicle would then possibly exceed the light-speed c haracteristic for the ambient area. " This sounds like the Alcubierre Warp Drive from the mid '90s.
The levitating and rotating superconductor disk, which Podkle tnov used to protect the object of experiment from the attraction produc ed by the energy of the vacuum, was externally energized by the external ly-powered solenoid coils. Thus, Podkletnov's system is stationary by de finition and not suitable for travel in air or space. Even if the superc onductive disk is made part of the craft, and if it is energized by the energy available on the craft, the resulting anomaly is one-sided, not e nveloping, and not providing the variable speed of light (VSL) environme nt for the craft.
In a supposed vacuum, there is nothing existing which can cause pressure, by definition of the term "vacuum". There is a REAL substance making a REAL pressure and a REAL density, whic h factors result from the measurable activities of the consituent subqua ntum particles comprising the aether plenum. What exactly is this so-called "Inflationary vaccum state"? And where is there any reproducable p hysical evidence for this fictional entity? And by what means does a supposed "inflationary vacuum state" create a su pposed "lowered pressure" ? The expression of "space-time curvature", since it is implied by the expr ession to be a localized space time curvature, is in direct contradictio n to Einstein's Relativity Theory, where Einstein insisted for the last 30 years of his life that any curvature of space, could only occur at co smological scales. Then, given the additional fact that the universe is infinite in volume, if there were indeed any curvature to space at the c osmological scale, such curvature would be perfectly immeasurable. Thus, this is an unprovable hypothesis, with no more validity than pink eleph ants. This is all delusionary gobbledegook designed to confuse and mislead the readers regarding the actual facts of the situation. There does exist a plenu m filled with subquantum particles, which is inhabited by creatures of a ll velocities, from zero velocity to infinite velocity, and everything i n between. We can create density gradients in this media by various means, and gener ate propulsion, by various means. But the descriptions in this document are not at all accurate descriptions of any of any the correct means of attaining propulsion in interstellar space. The document is purely misleading deception, in my opinion, based on elep hants of various colors, rather than on reproducably observable and inst rumentable facts. That being said, there is some grain of truth in it, that can only be dis covered when one knows the actual physics involved, which are in fact, a ether physics. None of this "inflationary vacuum state pressure density" nonsense. Get the idea of a plenum of subquantum particles, which can vary in local density and velocity, then look at the text again. Substitute the corre ct understandings and dispense with the misleading lables created in the text, and you might see something of what they are attemoting to descri be. Their evaluation of Podkletnov's super conducting disk pr opulsion method is perfectly wrong. Such a method can be perfectly well applied and will function perfectly well. The difficulty with this method is in the hazard resulting from any expos ure to the back-acting beam, which results after some delay in time, aft er the initiating high power electrical impulse. Any organic Life which happens to be in physical contact with any inorganic object, at the time the back-acting beam passes through the vicinity, will find themselves inextricably welded to the inorganic object. I have brought several suggestions to Podkletnov regarding various means to eliminate this hazard. But until the problem is solved, this means of propulsion will have severely limit ed applications. It appears to me that two of my suggestions will resolv e the problem. The problem is that it requires a lot of money to impleme nt either of them, something which Podkletov's team has a lack of. Give them more money, and I'll bet the problem will be solved shortly. Neil Login Nickname Password Security Code: Security Code Type Security Code Login Don't have an account yet?
For accuracy and consistency we MUST GET RID OF THE TERM VACUUM! The only reason why people such as Bearden and others use terms like "energy fro m the vacuum" is because vacuum is accepted by the mainstream estalishme nt.
Send a Message) I keep saying that, as it is described, my theory as to how it works is c loser to current theory, which is: Collapse the space between you and a gravitational body far away from you relative to one that is close. This puts you in the shared gravitationa l well between the two, and decreases the distance you have to travel, t o boot. A problem I see increasingly is that people build devices and come up wit h poor theories to describe the device's workings, then established scie ntists come in and say that the theory is unworkable, which it is, but t hen falsely conclude that the device isn't doing anything significant of study. Then there are the "testers" of devices that come in, find a par t that doesn't work like they expect, falsely conclude the part is fault y, repace the part with a conforming part, and of course the device does n't work like it would if they ran it as it was, and then they declare, "See, the device doesn't work!"
Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEne rgy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While ev ery effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ...
|
http://csua.com/feed/