| ||||||
| 5/17 |
| 2005/10/18 [Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Motd] UID:40166 Activity:very high |
_____________________________________
< Politburo Approved for YOUR safety! >
-------------------------------------
\ ^__^
\ (xx)\_______
(__)\ )\/\
U ||----w |
|| ||
ObDoNotTauntTheAMcKeePolitburo
\_ Say it with me: I will respect the politburo's authoritay!
\_ Was there a politburo meeting? Any news to report?
\_ The meeting was long and well-attended. amckee resigned, but by
\_ Yes. Ruling Soda With An Iron Fist!
\_ The official minutes are at http://csua.org/u/drj Quick summary:
the meeting was long and well-attended. amckee resigned, but by
the end of the meeting pretty much everyone agreed to reinstate
him (without root). Politburo decided not to log the motd, at
least for the time being, and will actually try to make the motd
more anonymous. There's now an explicit policy that root should
ask politburo before sorrying someone, except for account
breakins and similar emergency stuff. The official minutes
are in /csua/pub/minutes/F2005/20051017.politburo. --mconst
least for the time being, and will actually try to make it more
anonymous. There's now an explicit policy that root should ask
politburo before sorrying someone, except for account breakins
and similar emergency stuff. --mconst
\_ The minutes are particularly weak on explaining the discussion
about the motd. Basically it was decided that logging it or
moving it to somewhere else would decrease the possible use-
fulness to new students. We proposed instead to try and
do something which would improve the overall quality of the
motd and return it more to its original purpose, an anonymous
discussion. It was proposed we would create a program, much
like /csua/bin/motdedit that would allow a user near total
anonimity (or in the words of Vadim "we can make it really
hard to figure out who posted") when editing motd. In theory,
this will reduce the amount of personal attacks and trolling
in general. I hope this clears up the current course we are
taking in regards to the motd. -mrauser
\_ I don't think it's accurate to say that the motd's original
purpose was to be anonymous. In the early days, pretty
much everyone signed their names. It turned out to be
anonymous simply because it was a world-writable file,
so it attracted people who didn't want to be
identifiable. -tom
\_ How long was it before, say, half the posts were
no longer signed? (honestly, just curious) -mice
\_ I don't really recall, but trolling didn't take
over until the mid to late 90s. -tom
\_ How far back was 'original', anyway? -gm
\_ I believe /etc/motd was first made world-writable
on the original Apollo, which would mean 1988 or
so. -tom |
| 5/17 |
|
| csua.org/u/drj -> csua.berkeley.edu/Minutes/F2005/20051017.politburo bonnie, awall, scarr, myungk, mconst, amckee, mrauser, mbh, geordan, jon, ajani, njh, mikeh, vadim, linxu record turnout. cs steven chan of UPE did the website and we're hosting it. FreeBSD 60RC1 tried but it had a different set of problems. In 60Beta5, they fixed the PCI resource problem that we had with 5x, but the other problem is now the IO APIC problem in the single processor kernel. If we don't go to 6 right now, it'll be nice to know that 60 is a upgrade path. Sorrying: "The only time you can sorry someone immediately is when there is a security incident, or that the machine is unusable by anyone and there is no other way to deal with that, or the campus requires it." the big issue is the unilateral feature of the sorrying. don't listen to what people say so long politburo has voted on it. You can vote out politburo next general meeting, if you want. Politburo wanted to keep technical details to minimum to allow biggest latitude from alumni implementing it. Alumni felt like this was bad - lack of details was scary and/or stupid. Much discussion of legal liability incurred due to having logs. Another idea is MOTD and having another file in another folder that also happens to be world writable and that would solve all problems. This may be because of the minutes and misunderstanding. No true, some talk of "getting rid of MOTD" was just hypothecial. Much discussion revolves around what services does Soda provide? The other question is how do we change what changes that the politburo appear to want? Some discussion of moving the motd and the effects this would have. MOTD: "a superanonymous program would be written to anonymous the MOTD. passed 4,0 Much belief that logging has made the MOTD the flame fest it is now. Hopefully the superanon program will make things better. You still can write to the MOTD like now, the program is to frustrate those who want to log (and thus be able to attach name to flame) MOTD posts. Mailing list: "make a new, non-opt out, force opt-in, mailing list annouce@csua, csua@csua is opt-in, can opt-out. passed 4,0 Suprisingly little discussion of the actions of treasurer. I guess the "filibuster" of sorrying policy made every really tired. Current students feel that he was and will be good president. |