Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 39881
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/04/03 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
4/3     

2005/9/26-28 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:39881 Activity:nil
9/26    http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-3513_7-6333507-1.html
        Closer look at the recent studies comparing IE and Firefox security.
        Summary:  For the selected time period (Jan-Jun '05), Firefox had
        more critical vulnerabilities reported than IE -- but many more of the
        IE vulnerabilities remain unpatched.  Also, expanding the timeframe
        to start Aug '04 (when Firefox 1.0 came out), IE had more than double
        the Firefox flaws, and again IE has many more vulnerabilities without a
        patch (amazing what expanding the range by 5 months can do).
        Conclusion:  Use Firefox 1.0.7 or whatever the newest one is.
        \_ firefox sucks
           \_ Wow.  So useful.
           \_ with such a comment, you are required to supply a non-sucky
              alternative
             \_ ok.. what about an "I've been Trolled" T-shirt?
2025/04/03 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
4/3     

You may also be interested in these entries...
2013/8/22-10/28 [Computer/Companies/Yahoo, Industry/SiliconValley] UID:54732 Activity:nil
8/22    http://marketingland.com/yahoo-1-again-not-there-since-early-08-56585
        Y! is back to #1! Marissa, you are SEXY!!!
        \_ how the heck do you only have 225M uniq vis/month when there
           are over 1 billion internet devices out there?
           \_ You think that every single Internet user goes to Y!?
        \_ Tall blonde skinny pasty, not my type at all -former Y!
	...
2013/6/26-8/13 [Computer/Domains, Computer/Networking, Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:54697 Activity:nil
6/26    This ones for you psb -ausman
        http://25.media.tumblr.com/027fe67c84c2288cc16e9c85db690834/tumblr_mp0ag8DCQI1qzwozco1_1280.jpg
        \- that's pretty good. i wish someone had put the idea to be before i saw
           it on the internet, so see if i'd have put the 9 justices in the same
           boxes. JOHN PAUL STEVENS >> All the sitting justices. --psb
        \- that's pretty good. i wish someone had put the idea to be before i
	...
2012/5/18-7/20 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:54392 Activity:nil
5/18    On my Win7 machine, I've been using a PuTTY ssh session to soda as a
        proxy for my FireFox to bypass my company's OpenDNS when I visit
        http://tv.yahoo.com and so on.  It has been working fine for a long while.
        However, in the past couple weeks or so, my FireFox would either take
        several minutes to load the page, or failes to load it after several
        minutes.  I haven't changed any settings on my Win7 machine.  Rebooting
	...
2012/4/2-6/4 [Computer/SW/Languages/Java, Computer/SW/RevisionControl] UID:54353 Activity:nil
4/02    We use Perforce at work for revision control. It seems to work okay.
        Lately, a lot of the newer developers are saying that Perforce
        sucks and we should switch to Mercurial or Git. I have done some
        searching on the Internet and some others have this opinion. Added
        advantage is that Mercurial and Git are free. However, there would
        be some work to switch for the sysadmins and the developers.
	...
2012/4/26-6/4 [Computer/Networking] UID:54371 Activity:nil
4/26    I see that soda has an ipv6 address but ipv6 traffic from this box
        doesn't actually work (ping6 <DEAD>ipv6.google.com<DEAD>, ping6 http://www.v6.facebook.com
        Is this expected to work?
        \_ Soda doesn't have a real IPv6 address.  The IPv6 addresses you see
           in ifconfig are just link-local addresses; any IPv6-capable machine
           will autogenerate these, whether or not it's connected to an IPv6
	...
2012/4/23-6/1 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:54360 Activity:nil
4/19    My Firefox 3.6.28 pops up a Software Update box that reads "Your
        version of Firefox will soon be vulnerable to online attacks."  Are
        they planning to turn off some security feature in my version of
        Firefox?
        \_ Not as such, no, but they're no longer developing this version,
           so if a 3.6.x-targeted hack shows up, you're not going to get
	...
2012/2/5-3/26 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:54300 Activity:nil
2/5     How is Firefox on version 10, while I still have 3.6 installed.
        I wait for the X.1 versions and they never come out.
        \_ I'm also on 3.6.26.  It claims that versions 4 - 10 are all faster
           than 3.6.x, but do they use more memory?  Thx.
           \_ Newer Firefox versions use less memory too:
              http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/mozillas_memshrink_program_brings_big_memory_savings_firefox_7
	...
2011/11/8-30 [Computer/SW/Security, Computer/SW/OS/Windows] UID:54218 Activity:nil
11/8    ObM$Sucks
        http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms11-083
        \_ How is this different from the hundreds of other M$ security
           vulnerabilities that people have been finding?
           \_ "The vulnerability could allow remote code execution if an
               attacker sends a continuous flow of specially crafted UDP
	...
Cache (4672 bytes)
reviews.cnet.com/4520-3513_7-6333507-1.html
Internet Security Threat Report (registration required). Symantec found that during the first six months of 2005, the volume and the severity of Firefox's reported vulne rabilities was greater than that reported for Internet Explorer. On the surface, that sounds pretty bad, and it gives the Firefox naysayers fresh ammo, but I have a copy of the Symantec report myself. D oes it give me pause to rethink our Editors' Choice for Firefox? Microsoft is well known to be tone-deaf to independ ent security researchers. Fun with statistics Let's look at those numbers in greater detail. Symantec says that from Ja nuary through June 2005, there were 25 vendor-confirmed vulnerabilities reported in Mozilla Firefox, 18 of which Symantec classified as high thr eats, while there were 13 vendor-confirmed vulnerabilities reported in M icrosoft Internet Explorer, 8 of which were classified as high threats. But Symantec's talking about only those vulnerabilities that the vendor confirms, not all of the publicly known vulnerabilities that are out the re. Microsoft is well known to be tone-deaf to independent security rese archers. A more holistic view comes from security vendor Secunia, which issues its own vulnerability alerts, whether a vendor recognizes them or not. So, ac cording to Secunia, Mozilla offers its users a 94 percent patch rate, wh ile Microsoft provides only a 37 percent patch rate. From 2003 to 2005, Secunia reported 22 security flaws in Firefox 1x and 83 security flaws in Inter net Explorer 6x But, to be fair, Internet Explorer 6x has been out lo nger, and the vulnerability number is cumulative; A more accurate match would be 22 security vul nerabilities in Firefox 1x vs. If I'm going to conduct my banking and other such services online, I'm su re as heck not going to use Internet Explorer. For example, if you want to fill out a Katrina claim form on line with FEMA, you have no other choice but to use the only 66 percent secure Internet Explorer 6x Spin I think the recent reports about inherent Firefox's insecurity have been taken out of context. Yes, now that Firefox enjoys roughly 10 percent of the browser market, security researchers are giving it more scrutiny, a nd naturally, they're finding more flaws. According to Symantec, criminal hackers still prefer to exploit the vulnerabilities w ithin Internet Explorer. It's better that Firefox work out its kinks now rather than under the harsh glare of a computer virus or worm epidemic. It's better that Firefox work out its kinks now rat her than under the harsh glare of a computer virus or a worm epidemic. Truth is, I really don't care how many security vulnerabilities are found in a given software product (I once tested and documented software; I k now that "unintended features" appear within even the best products from time to time); I ask only that the vendor be responsible and fix the se curity vulnerabilities, especially the critical ones, in a timely fashio n Microsoft isn't one of those vendors. According to Secunia, Internet Explorer 6x has several unpatched, critical security vulnerabilities da ting back to 2003 (the first year Secunia offered its own security alert s). And this month, Microsoft arrogantly decided not to issue any securi ty patches--none. there's more If you're truly fed up with the whole Internet Explorer vs. Netscape 8, which uses technology from both Microsoft and Mozilla, flipping back and fort h to render pages based on Netscape's own White Lists of secure and inse cure URLs. I like Netscape, and I have used it for many years as my defa ult browser (before Firefox). I also like s ome of the cutting-edge features found only within Opera 8, but if I'd p aid $40 to download Opera a month ago, I'd be bummed that everyone else can get this browser for free now. I told the CEO of Opera the pay-to-vi ew-without-ads model was a huge limitation when they visited CNET about a year ago. Now that Opera is less than 1 percent of the market, I guess they took that criticism to heart. Find the right mobile tech If you ever leave your desk--hopefully, often--you know how frustrating i t can be to get your tech working on the go. In our special package, we help you find the right gear for your lifestyle, then show you how to us e it. Perfect gear for a road trip Don't get stuck behind the wheel without your tunes or the proper navigat ional equipment. Read our guide for the best portable road trip tech and suggestions on how to use it. Arm yourself We've put together a tech toolkit to keep you on target while you're away from home base. Visit Go Mobile's tool page for a hot-spot finder, a hi gh-tech hotel directory, and more.