Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 39873
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/05/25 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/25    

2005/9/26-28 [Consumer/Audio] UID:39873 Activity:nil
9/26    Reports that apple nano screen scratches and damages very easily:
        http://www.flawedmusicplayer.com
        \_ Evidence to the contrary:
           http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardware/nano.ars/3
           \_ scratch = yes (gets ugly fast), "damage" = no (still plays)
              how often/easily the LCD really cracks from the inside = ?
              \_ If the song names are unreadable and the photos are
                 unviewable, that == damage.
           \_ Yes this is 1 data point that everyone keeps referencing.
        \_ I can tell you that after having the Nano for 2 weeks, it does
           indeed scratch very easy.  I'm one of those people who take
           VERY good care of my electronics, and even I got various scratches
           on it that make the screen unreadable.  Simply having a cell phone
           rub up against it in my pocket, while other devices with nice
           screens (i.e. PSP) have no problem.  Hopefully Apple will use a
           tougher screen going forward, I had the iPod-Mini for a year with
           not a scratch.
2025/05/25 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/25    

You may also be interested in these entries...
2012/9/14-11/7 [Consumer/Camera, Consumer/CellPhone] UID:54477 Activity:nil 53%like:54476
9/12    iPhone 4S has new features like 8MP rear camera and Siri, and iPhone 5
        has 1.2MP front camera, 4" display, and 4G LTE.  My 17-month-old
        Android phone has 8MP rear camera, 1.3MP front camera, 4.2" display,
        voice search, voice-to-text that supports English, Cantonese,
        Mandarin, Japanese plus other languages/dialects that I don't speak,
        4G LTE, and voice-guided navigation, all built-in.  I don't get what
	...
2009/3/12-19 [Consumer/Audio] UID:52704 Activity:kinda low
3/12    I'm thinking about buying one of the new iPod Shuffles.
        Does anybody have a sense whether the headphone-iPod connection
        is designed well?  It looks potentially fragile in the
        pictures.  I've had a lot of bad experiences with Apple
        power cords which fall apart at the junction points.
        \_ It's brand fucking new.  Who knows?
	...
2008/7/10-11 [Consumer/Audio] UID:50531 Activity:nil
7/10    Is the new iPod 3G coming out tomorrow?
        \_ ^Pod^Phone. yesh.
	...
2007/9/12-14 [Computer/Companies/Apple, Consumer/Audio] UID:48042 Activity:moderate
9/12    My mother-in-law bought an iPhone. I have a CD she would like to
        load onto her iPhone. I ripped the CD into MP3s and imported them
        into iTunes. How can she listen to the CD on her iPhone w/o
        blowing away the music she already had on there (from home) which
        is what iTunes wants to do. I don't have access to her home
        computer, which is the one the phone is registered with. How can I
	...
Cache (4898 bytes)
arstechnica.com/reviews/hardware/nano.ars/3
Click to Visit What does it take to destroy an iPod nano, and what's inside this tiny pa ckage? We wanted to answer both questions and strangely enough answering the first allowed us to answer the second. We could take our turns at p urposely rendering the iPod nano broken, and then when it had endured mo re damage than it could handle we'd end its misery with a respectful aut opsy. Now, we know that destroying the iPod nano makes some (strange) gr own men want to cry. Rest assured, you can still buy one yourself, and t he local priest said all iPod nanos go to heaven. Because of our initial apprehension about the breakability of our tiny ne w friend as well as reading about similar apprehension from many potenti al iPod nano buyers online, we decided to abuse our precious little nano for the sake of science. We wanted to stress test the nano in various r eal-life situations where iPod users have proven themselves to be a litt le less than genius in the past to see how the nano could handle the abu se. To break the nano in the most scientific manner possible, we would n eed 5 or 6 nanos and a high-tech laboratory built for this purpose. Unfo rtunately, all we had was a single 2GB black iPod nano and a giant parki ng lot, so we had to make do. What we get is a great idea of how much ab use this little guy can take. To simulate everyday accidents that could result in a broken iPod, we cam e up with a few situations that we felt would ultimately leave the nano lifeless: 1 Sitting on the iPod nano 2 Dropping it while jogging (4-6mph), 3 Dropping at various speeds: 8-10mph (slow bicycle), 15-20mph (fast bi cycle), 30mph (slow car), and 50mph (fast car) 4 Dropping the nano from various heights. Our first test consisted of placing the iPod nano on a solid wood chair a nd sitting on it, as people are prone to do from time to time. As you ca n guess, this "test" yielded basically zero damage resultsso little, in fact, that we didn't even take pictures. For our second test, one of us held on to the iPod, jogged about 20 feet and dropped the nano onto a sidewalk. This proved pretty uneventful as w ell and the nano didn't even skip a beat: Then, one of us jumped in the car and we started on the higher-speed test s We drove a slow 10mph around a tiny roundabout and released the nano out of the driver's side window. The nano didn't really slide that much and just fell the to ground. The results for the "slow bicycle" test wer e duplicated for the "fast bicycle" test. The nano didn't slide much and again, just fell to the ground with some slight scratches. The nano was still working fine, so we took it up to 30mph and performed the same drop. This time it slid pretty far and surprisingly endured onl y cosmetic scratches, mostly on the front of the player: Because of the distinct lack of expected damage from the first two car dr ops, we sped up to 50mph and launched the nano on an impressive slide an d tumble that, again, really only scratched the surface: Next we tried dropping it from a "considerable" height. The height we dro pped it from was approximately 9ft (ie. This was the first point where the iPod started to ope rate abnormally. The display was seriously bugged out, but the music con tinued to play and navigating via the scroll wheel still worked as expec ted: At this point we were astounded that the iPod nano was still working prop erly, albeit with a broken display. Because we had honestly expected the iPod nano to break by this time, we were forced to depart from our plan ned schedule of destruction and try and run over it with the car. Surely , we thought, it could never withstand the crushing power of German auto motive engineering. We placed the nano in the path of the car and drove over it with both fro nt and rear tires. Driving over the nano produced sickening crunching no ises which coincidentally sounded a lot like an LCD being crushed. After the first hit and run, the iPod's display was not cracked but was showi ng some nasty vertical lines. Shockingly, the nano was still playing mus ic and the controls still operated as expected, as we were still able to skip ahead, go back, pause, and play music! Baffled, we did the only thing we could think of at the time: we ran over the nano again! This time the screen went total ly blank, but the band played on. In a final act of desperation, we decided to expose the iPod to a catastr ophic event that would certainly destroy it. Lacking a really high place to drop the nano from, we decided the throw the nano as high as we coul d, say 40 feet into the air, and let it landhardon the concrete. In addition to the display showing nothing and the backlight being perpetually stuck on, the music finally subsided. The nano had journeyed to the Land Where Consumer Ele ctronics Are Eternally Blessed. Since it was dead, we thought we'd open it up and see what made it tick..
Cache (97 bytes)
www.flawedmusicplayer.com
FRAME: http://homepage.mac.com/matthewdotcom/nano FRAME: http://webhosting.yahoo.com/forward.html