Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 39796
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/05/25 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/25    

2005/9/21 [Science/Disaster] UID:39796 Activity:high
9/21    I know this is a silly question but I'm just wondering what is the
        expected behavior of the hurricane when you detonate a nuclear
        weapon into the eye of the storm? Does it have any effect at all?
        \_ I am amazed by your sense of scale... for a Cal graduate.
        \_ Aside from adding energy to the whole storm system and giving
           any debris carried by the water heavy radioactive contamination,
           no.  Hurricanes are pretty large and energetic; I suspect a nuke
           large enough to dsirupt a hurricane would likely be so large, that
           large enough to disrupt a hurricane would likely be so large, that
           the nuke presented a greater threat than the hurricane.
           the nuke would present a greater threat than the hurricane.
        \_ The hurricane would spread the fallout over a larger area than
           if there wasn't a hurricane.
        \_ What would you expect to happen?  Why do you think a nuke would do
           anything?
        \_ it would open a stargate...
           \_ (another valuable contribution from an alumnus)
              \_ And this comment contributes SO MUCH more.  Relax man, you're
                 taking motd waaaay too seriously.
        \_ the pressure from the nuke would negate the low of the hurricane,
           causing the hurricane to dissipate peacefully.  make it so, #1!
           \_ the ensign from soda.CSUA needs to be fired out of a photon
              torpedo tube
        \_ http://haiku.shacknews.com/firecane.jpg
           \- we are saving the nukes to put out oil well fires.
              \_ We must pre-emptively nuke the arctic wildlife refuge. In this
                 post-9/11 world, we can't afford to wait until after an oil
                 well has been built and burns.
        \_ http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/C5c.html
2025/05/25 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/25    

You may also be interested in these entries...
2012/10/29-12/4 [Science/Disaster, Computer/SW/Languages/Java, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:54516 Activity:nil
10/29   Go Away Sandy.
        \_ Sorry, Coursera is performing preventive maintenance for this
           class site ahead of Hurricane Sandy. Please check back in 15 minutes.
           class site ahead of Hurricane Sandy. Please check back in 15
           minutes.
        \_ Bitch.
	...
2009/12/2-26 [Science/Disaster] UID:53559 Activity:low
12/2    So I am trying to convince my company to take disaster planning
        more seriously. Does anyone have any hard numbers on how often
        data centers fail? I mean blow up, burn down, flood, etc, with
        total loss of all services for an extended period of time.
        \_ hard numbers tend to be SEKRET.  But check out Yahoo's recent
           outage and UltraDNS' outage.  Those were both pretty bad.
	...
2008/1/4-7 [Science/Disaster] UID:48891 Activity:nil
1/4     Are storm, hurricane and typhoon all the same thing?
        \_ A typhoon is a hurricane in the Pacific.
           \_ Except when it's in the Eastern Pacific, where it's called
              a hurricane.
        \_ A hurricane has to reach a certain rotational speed (80mph?) before
           it officially is recorded as a hurricane.  Lower than that it is
	...
2007/10/10-14 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:48287 Activity:low
10/10   My google-fu is weak.  Can anyone point me to the 11 items the UK court
        ruled had to be pointed out as errors in "An Inconvenient Truth"?
        \_ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/7037671.stm
        \_ http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article2632660.ece
        \_ Here's some more for you based on my prior research.  I don't have
           anything to add on the other items I don't mention:
	...
2007/3/13-15 [Science/Disaster, Science/GlobalWarming] UID:45955 Activity:low
3/13    "I don't want to pick on Al Gore," Don J. Easterbrook, an emeritus
        professor of geology at Western Washington University, told hundreds of
        experts at the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America.
        "But there are a lot of inaccuracies in the statements we are seeing,
        and we have to temper that with real data."
        http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/13/science/13gore.html
	...
Cache (2673 bytes)
www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/C5c.html
Back to Main FAQ Page Subject: C5c) Why don't we try to destroy tropical cyclones by nuking the m ? During each hurricane season, there always appear suggestions that one sh ould simply use nuclear weapons to try and destroy the storms. Apart fro m the fact that this might not even alter the storm, this approach negle cts the problem that the released radioactive fallout would fairly quick ly move with the tradewinds to affect land areas and cause devastating e nvironmental problems. Now for a more rigorous scientific explanation of why this would not be a n effective hurricane modification technique. amount of energy require d A fully developed hurricane can release heat energy at a rate of 5 to 20x10^13 watts and converts less than 10% of the heat into the mechanic al energy of the wind. The heat release is equivalent to a 10-megaton nu clear bomb exploding every 20 minutes. According to the 1993 World Alman ac, the entire human race used energy at a rate of 10^13 watts in 1990, a rate less than 20% of the power of a hurricane. If we think about mechanical energy, the energy at humanity's disposal is closer to the storm's, but the task of focusing even half of the energy on a spot in the middle of a remote ocean would still be formidable. Br ute force interference with hurricanes doesn't seem promising. In addition, an explosive, even a nuclear explosive, produces a shock wav e, or pulse of high pressure, that propagates away from the site of the explosion somewhat faster than the speed of sound. Such an event doesn't raise the barometric pressure after the shock has passed because barome tric pressure in the atmosphere reflects the weight of the air above the ground. For normal atmospheric pressure, there are about ten metric ton s (1000 kilograms per ton) of air bearing down on each square meter of s urface. To change a Category 5 hurricane into a Category 2 hurricane you would have to add about a h alf ton of air for each square meter inside the eye, or a total of a bit more than half a billion (500,000,000) tons for a 20 km radius eye. It' s difficult to envision a practical way of moving that much air around. Attacking weak tropical waves or depressions before they have a chance to grow into hurricanes isn't promising either. About 80 of these disturba nces form every year in the Atlantic basin, but only about 5 become hurr icanes in a typical year. There is no way to tell in advance which ones will develop. If the energy released in a tropical disturbance were only 10% of that released in a hurricane, it's still a lot of power, so that the hurricane police would need to dim the whole world's lights many ti mes a year.