news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050914/ap_on_re_us/katrina_earthquake_risks
AP Major Quake Could Be Worse Than Katrina By ERICA WERNER, Associated Press Writer Wed Sep 14, 4:08 PM ET WASHINGTON - As many as 18,000 people dead. That's not the late st estimate of Hurricane Katrina's toll on the Gulf Coast. That's a wors t-case scenario if a major earthquake were to hit Los Angeles.
Click Here The figures are hypothetical, from a model published in May by government researchers studying the Puente Hills fault under the city. Scientists warn that there's little doubt a major quake will hit California in comi ng years or decades, though many scenarios are not as disastrous as Puen te Hills. As was the case with Katrina, experts say the federal government hasn't d one enough to prepare. "There's not enough money to carry out the research and implementation pr ograms that need to be put into place," said Susan Tubbesing, executive director of the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute in Oakland, Ca lif. "If funds were available, if these were higher priorities, these ki nds of things could be addressed now before an earthquake." California has been hit by significant quakes about every 15 years over t he past century. Experts say there's a better-than 60 percent chance tha t a quake with a magnitude around 67 will hit Southern California or th e Bay Area within decades. "The reality is when you have a disaster of that proportion, you need the federal government," Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa said Wednes day in Washington, where he was meeting with federal officials. "I think the question is, is the federal government prepared to provide the reso urces that we need? I think that, clearly, by what we've seen in Louisia na, the jury's out." Just as Katrina exposed a failure to sufficiently strengthen the levees a round New Orleans, experts say a big quake in California, Washington sta te or the Mississippi Valley could reveal that too little was done to ma ke buildings, bridges and roads earthquake-proof. "There's very little mitigation going on, and it's because it's so expens ive to do, just like it was so expensive to fix the levees," said Chris Poland, head of Degenkolb Engineers in San Francisco. "So I think we wou ld have the same reaction: Why didn't we fix those buildings? Congress created the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program in 197 7 after a series of major quakes in Alaska, California and China. The go al was to reduce the loss of life and property by funding research on ho w buildings and structures respond to earthquakes, improving building co des, and conducting earthquake models along different fault lines. But funding for the program has been essentially flat for more than a dec ade. About $125 million was allocated in 2005 a decline of more than 30 perc ent in real dollars from its first 1978 budget of $67 million, according to House Science Committee budget figures.
US Geological Survey has about 140 employees working on earthquake issues under the joint fede ral program, down from more than 300 a decade ago, said William Ellswort h, chief scientist with the earthquake hazards team at USGS in Menlo Par k, Calif. "We have greatly reduced the number of people we have doing research, we have had to cut way back on field investigation programs, we've had to w ork smarter with less," Ellsworth said. According to some experts, earthquake readiness has been hurt by the same shift of focus from natural disasters to terrorism that's being partly blamed for the bungled response to Katrina.
Homeland Security , lawmakers also moved the lead agency role for the earthquake program fr om FEMA to the National Institute of Standards and Technology. But they never gave NIST any money to perform its new leadership role. "Right now you have a program that probably has appropriated somewhere ar ound $130 million per year, and we don't have a lead agency to supervise or manage it," said Tom O'Rourke, a professor of civil and environmenta l engineering at Cornell University. Michael Buckley, deputy director of FEMA's mitigation division, denied th ere had been a decreased focus on disaster preparedness or mitigation, a nd said FEMA's work on earthquake preparedness has led to successes such as improved building code recommendations. "From my perspective, we're holding our own pretty well, certainly are ve ry busy, and I expect that that would be the trend here in the future," Buckley said. California has instituted new building codes and spent billions to shore up old structures in the wake of the Loma Prieta earthquake of 1989 and the Northridge earthquake of 1994, which, before Katrina, was the nation 's costliest natural disaster with $40 billion in losses. But many older buildings still need upgrades, including some 900 hospital buildings in California, and scientists would like to do more research to learn more about how to build structures that can withstand earthquak es. A key network of seismographs USGS is installing around the country is la gging only 563 of a planned 7,050 machines have been put in place, mai nly because funding has stuck far behind planned levels. For example, Co ngress authorized $35 million for the network in 2005, but appropriated only $8 million. Experts contend that spending on mitigation reaps huge dividends. They po int out that retrofitted roads and buildings survived the Northridge ear thquake, while others that hadn't been retrofitted did not. Some experts fear Americans have become complacent about earthquake risks because it's been more than 10 years since the Northridge quake. "What happens is people forget and people lose interest in the seismic ne tworks," said Jeroen Tromp, director of the Caltech Seismological Labora tory in Pasadena, Calif. How do you gen erate enough funding to do more than just keep your head above water?"
This satellite image provided by NOAA shows Hurricane Ophelia at 1315 hours EDT just off the coast of the Carolinas, Wednesday Sept. Hurricane Ophelia lashed the North Carolina coast with high winds and heavy rains Wednesday, beginning an anticipated two-day assault that thr eatened serious flooding and an 11-foot storm surge.
The informati on contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewr itten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associ ated Press.
|