7/8 Michelle Wie poll. "a" if you're Asian, "w" if White, "b" if Black,
"h" if Hispanic, "." for anonymous, so on and so forth:
She's cute: waww
She's not cute: aw
She's looks like an ugly Asian Amazonian woman: a
She's 6-feet tall and will smash in your face with a 5-iron: a
She's ok: waaw
ok, WouldKHooBfEC: w
\_ isn't this == "not cute"?
\_ I don't think so. It means she's attractive, just not
REALLY attractive.
\_ I believe the term you're looking for is ``I wouldn't kick
her/him/it out of bed for crackers.'' -dans
\_ I think its "...out of bed for EATTING crackers."
\_ I thought this implied fairly hot.
\_ No, just not repulsive enough to turn down if the
opportunity presented itself.
\_ Repulsive enough? I'd rather do myself than any
degree of repulsive chick. Unless, perhaps, it was
only her personality that was repulsive...
\_ Look, it depends on how annoyed you get over crumbs
in the bed, but it obviously means "hotter than
a girl you wouldn't have sex with just cause she
annoyed you". Wie is attractive enough to sleep
with, but she *would* get kicked out of bed for
eating crackers. Now, if the chick is REALLY hot you
can append "even if crackers was the family dog". -phuqm
\_ Isn't that what "cute" means: "attractive, just not
REALLY attractive"?
\_ Apparently 3 people disagree.
\_ Either she's cute or not, how hard is that?
\_ it's impossible because English doesn't work like that.
there is a middle ground which is not covered by either
statment unless you qualify it.
She's 15 you perv: w
\_ 15 with a fully-developed chest:
http://www.golftodaymagazine.com/0409sep/images/11-Michelle_Wie.jpg
\_ pedophile!
\_ how do you know it won't develop more?
\_ If she were my daughter you'd have to contend with my
fully-developed boot up your ass.
\_ What the hell's on her forehead? |