Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 38268
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2024/12/25 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
12/25   

2005/6/23-25 [Recreation/Dating] UID:38268 Activity:low
6/23    Torquemada Gonzalez had his fun at Gitmo, now he is coming
        after your porn:
        http://csua.org/u/chs
        \_ FWIW, I think this was John "I covered Lady Justice's Titties"
           Ashcroft's doing.
           \_ He might not have bothered if it weren't the case that so many
              photogrophers liked to snap pics of him with the titties in the
              background.
              \_ Possible, but it's still unbelievably stupid.
        \_ Yeehaw! gotta love those priorities.
           \_ But, won't you think of the children?  That said, they're all
              fronts for the terrorists anyway.  Tell me again, why do you
              hate America?  -John
        \_ It gets weirder ... this also applies to personal pictures ... which
           means you can no longer have a picture of your dick with your hand
           on it on a website, for example.
           \_ First they came for the bestiality people, and I didn't speak up
              because I didn't fuck donkeys. Then they came for Janet Jackson
              and her tit, and I didn't speak up because I'm not really into
              her. Then they came for the pictures of my hand on my dick,
              and no one was left to speak up.
           \_ It is actually even more annoying than that. Not only can they
           \_ It is actually even more annoying than that. Not only can
              come after you, they can come after say, Yahoo if you put
              a picture like that up as your personal photo. I think this
              is going to kill services like snapfish.
                \_ I doubt it.  Some judge will put a stop to this.
              is going to kill services like shutterfly.
                   \_ One just did in fact, at least until Sep 7, when
                      they injunction expires.
                      http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1430095/posts
2024/12/25 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
12/25   

You may also be interested in these entries...
2013/10/24-2014/2/5 [Recreation/Dating] UID:54740 Activity:nil
10/9    I'm a white guy who is with an Asian (mainland China) girl for the
        first time. We were having sex and when she was really enjoying
        herself she started yelling: "Fuck the chink out of me!"
        I tried not to laugh, but now (it's been a few days) I find it a
        little disturbing. What kinda issues does this girl have or should
        I ignore it cuz it's crazy talk during sex?
	...
2013/3/21-5/10 [Recreation/Dating] UID:54633 Activity:nil
3/21    Is there a reason why women love junk mail and spam mail? I helped
        my family members get rid of Red Plum, Valassis, DMA, etc and
        everyone's junk mail has decreased significantly, however all the
        women in my life (wife, sister, mother) are pissed at me. Ditto with
        email spam: through their permissions I unsubscribed mailing lists,
        but now they want them back again because they're missing out on some
	...
2013/1/22-2/19 [Recreation/Dating] UID:54585 Activity:nil
1/22    "Male Professionals with Higher Ethical Standards Earn Less"
        http://web.hbr.org/email/archive/dailystat.php?date=051412
        I've been trying to explain to my wife why I made less than all her
        male acquaintance, and she never believed me! :-)
	...
2012/12/6-18 [Recreation/Dating, Recreation/Media] UID:54549 Activity:nil
12/6    Lesson learned: don't talk about Monty Python on a date. Women just
        don't seem to get it.
        \_ You are dating the wrong women (for you) then. My sister-in-law
           loves it and yet I don't find it all that funny. It's not a
           gender thing.
           \_ is she a nerd? does she laugh funny? is she actually decent looking?
	...
Cache (4768 bytes)
csua.org/u/chs -> www.forbes.com/business/services/2005/06/23/porn-entertainment-movies-cz_sl_0623porn.html
NEW YORK - Is your Internet browser a little less polluted with porn toda y? Are you seeing fewer banner ads promoting hard-core sex? Largely unnoticed in the mai nstream world, his new porn record-keeping regulations went into effect today, causing fits of apoplexy among much of the porn world. "This is an attack, we are back to the dark ages of witch hunts and inste ad of burning innocent people at the stake they are putting them in jail and ripping apart their businesses and families," wails the Web site of Lisa S Lawless, whose company specializes in videos featuring female o rgasms. Casualties so far, if anyone will miss them, include the aptly n amed Bound & Gagged, which describes itself as "The world's greatest mal e bondage magazine." At least it was: Its Web site shut down on Wednesda y The new rules, which are updates to regulations that date back to 1992, r equire porn promoters and distributors to maintain records proving their models and actors are over the age of 18, instead of signed forms and o ther loose documentation. In an announcement last month, Gonzales said t he new rules "are crucial to preventing children from being exploited by the production of pornography." Although seemingly innocuous and for a good cause, the rules have suddenly forced the freewheeling trade to eit her find and organize legal documents for every performer engaging in se x, remove the pictures, or face jail time of up to five years for the fi rst offense and up to ten years for additional offenses. Oh, that includes any photos or movies shot within the past ten ye ars. Good luck tracking down all those once-naked people, many of whom a re foreigners or use bogus names. And the industry only had 30 days to get the records together from the ti me the regulations were announced. The new regulations "will likely drive law-abiding adult businesses out o f the industry not because they ignored the minimum-age requirements, bu t because they simply cannot afford to maintain the extensive records re quired under the new rules," Cambria tells his clients. While compiling such records is hard enough for the actual producers of p orn, they constitute the minority of much of what is distributed over th e Internet. Most Internet porn sites are run by small-time independents who agree to distribute porn made by photographers and film producers, i n exchange for a cut of as much as $70 for every purchase directed back to the originating sites. These so-called "secondary producers" now must also keep age documents for every performer, a near-impossible task tha t is being hotly disputed by the industry. The Free Speech Coalition, a front group for the porn trade, filed a moti on for a temporary restraining order on Monday in Denver federal court, in which it argued that the extension of the rules to the secondary prod ucers contradicts a 1998 federal court ruling (in the same court distric t) that porn distributors can't be held responsible for porn produced by someone else. A hearing scheduled for today was canceled pending a reso lution of a complaint filed in the same case. In the meantime, the plain tiffs in the case (including members of the Free Speech Coalition) won't be subject to records inspections, although the new rules will be enfor ced for everyone else. people ), a porn p roducer and distributor, told its US Web site distributors on Wednesda y to remove the company's hard-core content, despite the fact that the c ompany is based in Barcelona, Spain, outside the reach of the US Depar tment of Justice. The company says it doesn't want to jeopardize the "pr ivacy and safety of its models" by distributing their personal informati on and records to outside Internet distributors. In the separate complaint filed last week against the attorney general in the same Denver court, the Free Speech Coalition and two co-plaintiffs who produce porn argue that the rules violate their First Amendment righ t to have sex on camera. They also claim the attorney general's contenti on that this is all for the benefit of protecting children is dubious at best, since performers older than 60 must now also provide proof of age . That may likely explain the motivation for at least one of the co-plainti ffs, David Conners of San Diego. Under the stage name "Dave Cummings," t he gray-haired and balding 65-year-old touts himself as "the oldest acti ve male porn star in the business," with a repertoire that includes Suga r Daddy (volumes 1 through 23) and Grandpa Dave's Bedtime Tales. Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes for Nasdaq, at least 20 minu tes for NYSE/AMEX US indexes are delayed at least 15 minutes with the exception of Nasdaq, Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 which are 2 minutes delayed.
Cache (1091 bytes)
www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1430095/posts
markomalley DENVER, June 23 /US Newswire/ -- The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) announ ced today a stipulation between the parties in Free Speech Coalition et al v Alberto Gonzales, under which the US Department of Justice agree s that the regulations relating to the federal record-keeping and labeli ng law, 18 USC Section 2257, will not be enforced against plaintiffs and all FSC members until September 7, 2005. The US District Court in Denver will hold a preliminary injunction hear ing on August 8, 2005, after which the judge will determine whether to i ssue a further injunction. Specifically, the DoJ will not conduct any inspections or pursue any clai ms with regard to the plaintiffs and their members, but reserves the rig ht to inspect and prosecute anyone who is not a plaintiff or FSC member. View Replies Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.