5/27 To the poster who suggested on using less energy or move closer,
it is not possible in the United States. Take San Francisco for
example. Pretty much over 90% of the people who work there live
outside of SF, most of whom would live closer if rent and properties
were cheaper. The fact of the matter is, most people simply can't
afford to buy a 500 sq. ft. property in SF. In fact I know some
people who live in Pittsburg or somewhere ridiculously far just
so they can buy a place. It's not that people don't want to live
closer, but that most convenient places are not affordable, unless
you're an FOB immigrant (who usually bring in a lot of money), did
pretty well during the dot-coms, or inherited wealth. I say that
living closer is impossible in the US because the government does
not plan a city, at all. Look at Scandinavian countries. City
planners actually plan out how, where, & when to add or modify
commercial and residential areas, which meet stringent criteria such
as growth demand, commute time, convenience, distance from the
National highway, etc. They are way ahead of everyone else in terms
of city planning and housing development. In the US, no planning.
Let private enterprizes do it all. Fuck United States.
\_ So go live in Scandinavia then and pay 50% of your income in
taxes.
\_ So you're saying op's not not allowed to criticize aspects
of US urban planning? If you don't like it get out? "Fuck
United States" isn't really constructive, but do you believe
that there's no room for improvement or to look to a good
example of a place that does traffic planning right? I don't
like a lot of aspects of Scandinavian "central planning", but
looking at traffic in the Bay Area, it might certainly be a
good idea to think about alternatives... -John
\_ No John, I'm telling the OP to move to Scandinavia if he
doesn't like the U.S. WTF is your problem? If you're going
to say "Fuck the U.S." then move. Stop reading more into
posts than what there is and leave your preconceived
notions at home.
\_ Doesn't look like I'm the one with the problem. Your
comment sure sounds like "either accept what's wrong with
here, or go elsewhere with all their problems." Relax.
\_ The "Fuck US" op has no intention of staying in the US
for the sake of retirement. By the way I want to ask you
if you've personally LIVED and EXPERIENCED places other
than the US. If you haven't, perhaps you're a bit
quick to the tong. What I observe typically with Americans
is that they've only eaten certain types of food (hot dogs
and burgers) and are quick to judge what is good and
what is not, and very unreceptive to criticisms. That
goes the same for what they believe is good or not without
having extensive exposure to the things they judge.
And yes when the time is right I'll go back to the place
I love, while you're stuck with a broken country -the op
\_ Just out of curiosity, where is this place that you
love? -mice
\_ This is not really true. First of all, there are only 1.5M jobs in
SF and 750M residents, so far more than 10% of the people who work
\_ I think you mean 750k
\_ Obviously. Thanks for the correction.
here live here. I ride the J Church to work everyday into the
financial district and it is full of commuters. And you can
afford to live in SF, no matter how poor you are, you just
have to reset your expectations of how much space you deserve.
have to reset your expectations of how much space you need.
\- yes, and some people choose to trade drive time for sq footage.
There are even 70k subsidized housing units here for people
who are low income. I lived like a college student for 10 years
and saved up my down payment for a house. Sure it is small,
but if you went to Scandanavia, you would find that people
live in small houses there, too. Sure, not every single person
who works here can live here, but if you want to, you can too,
you just have to be willing to make the sacrifice. And if nothing
else, you can live near a BART station. -ausman
\_ "it is not possible in the United States"? You're a moron. It may
mean moving to a different city and getting a different job.
\_ Know shit. Now if OP had said "Fuck the Bay Area" instead of
"Fuck the USA", I would agree wholeheartedly. America has many
many medium sized cities, towns, and a even a few big cities where
reasonable commutes, homeownership, a good job and a reasonable
cost of living are all compatible. The Bay Area just isn't one
of them. What amazes me about the Bay Area is that for all its
money and all its over-educated citizens, it has the worst
traffic, the shittiest public transit, the worst layout, the most
bike-unfriendly streets, the biggest rippoff rentals, the biggest
ripoff homes to buy, and some of the worst pollution of anyplace
I've seen in the U.S. And still Bay Areans blather on about the
superiority of the Bay Area. Fuck the Bay Area.
\_ The worst traffic? What? Have you been to Los Angeles?
Driven on 405 at 4PM while going 2MPH? Every single day?
\_ Ok, fuck LA as well. I take it for granted that LA sucks.
\_ Shittiest public transit? Not even close by a country mile.
\_ Business doesn't need to concentrate in one place. There's no
reason a lot of those companies in SF couldn't be in, say,
Stockton. The main reason they are there now, I think, is that
people *want* to work in SF and so companies move there to
attract quality employees. Would you rather work on the 50th
floor with a view of the Golden Gate or in an industrial
building in Fresno?
\_ Well, Fresno is kinda a hell-hole, but I think I _might_
take it over SF. I can think of other cheap places I might
actually like to live though, like Chico.
\_ Four of my uncles and their families immigrated to SF 16yrs ago with
only a few hunderd dollars in the pocket. They worked non-tech
jobs (restaurant cook, driver at senior home, hairdresser, janitor,
...), some with two jobs. Now they own three homes and one 4-apt
complex (with mortgages, of course) in Sunset District, two small
restaurants, and have eight kids in high schools and colleges. Now
tell me again about the impossibility. It just comes down to
spending level. If one "needs to" eat out everyday, go to movies
every weekend, refresh the wardrobe every season, go on a trip every
year, and drive a Beamer, well ...
\_ Yeah. Well, man, life isn't that long. 16 years of your prime
adult life working really hard etc.... I think it's admirable
and all but on the other hand I don't look down on people who
don't choose to go through such crap just to live in an expensive
place when they can live pretty nice without doing all that.
\_ Agreed. I don't look down on those people either, as long as
they admit that "it is possible but I choose not to do that"
instead of whining about how impossible it is. -- PP |