5/19 Is a 77GB disk considered big three years ago? I just realized that
one of the machines I got three years ago at work has a 77GB disk, ten
times as big as what are on the other machines at work I got around
the same time.
\_ I've never seen a 77GB drive. Do you mean 80GB or 74GB SCSI?
\_ I dunno but 7.7GB was definitely really, really tiny.
\_ I've never seen a 77GB drive. Do you mean 80GB (77GiB)?
80GB for mid-2002 sounds on the mid-high end. Like it would be
large but a relatively good price/GB.
\_ Actually, the label on the disk says 82.3GB. Disk Management in
XP says it's 76.68GB with no unallocated or reserved space. It's
an IBM Deskstar disk.
\_ It was considered a larger size 3 years ago, but we already were
utilizing 60 gig drives on a regular basis in 2001. So no, it's
\_ You sound smart using... i mean... utilizing big words like this!
\_ This reminds me of the radio commercial that says people are
judged by their vocabulary.
nothing unusual.
\_ It is considered science fiction when I had my first computer.
\_ Ok, so let's say you had 77GB back in 1990 (yes I'm serious), and
P4 and all that power on your desktop. How much productive would
you have been relative to everyone else? And let's forward to 2005
and suppose you had 100TB of disk space and 100GHgz of Pentium XXX,
how much more productive would you be?
\_ Depends on what you do for a living? If you're a farmer then
not much. If you're a cosmologist, oceanographer, atmospheric
scientist, big oil company, or geneticist then perhaps a lot. |