Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 37689
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/05/24 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/24    

2005/5/15-16 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:37689 Activity:low
5/15    Star Wars anti-Bush?
        http://csua.org/u/c2r (Yahoo Movies)
        \_ "Lucas said he patterned his story after historical transformations
           from freedom to fascism, never figuring when he started his prequel
           trilogy in the late 1990s that current events might parallel his
           space fantasy."
           Let's see, Bush=Dark side, storm troopers=Marines, and US=facsist?
           If that's what Lucas is trying to convey (consciously or
           subconciously), I totally endorse him. GO LUCAS!
           \_ Cue Empire / Darth Vader music.  You should all play Kotor 2:
              "With all that talk about standing up on your own two feet, I
              shoulda known she was with the Dark Side!"
        \_ http://www.filibustercartoons.com/archive.php?id=20050511
           \_ I think it is pretty clear "turning to the dark side" is a
              reference to homosexuality and sodomy.
                \_ The more seductive side of the force?
              \_ And here I thought it was a reference to stouts.  "Once
                 you go black, you'll never go back."
        \_ I actually think Star Wars I (the very first one) favors
           conservative/religious thinking. In the end, when Skywalker flys
           the X-plane and disengages his computerized scope in favor of
           using the "force", it is like a subtle way saying that science
           and engineering is no match for the almighty super-natural force.
           It's not clear what that force is, but one can easily interpret it
           as the force of Jesus, Allah, or whatever you want it to be.
              \- mysticism != organized/dogmatic religion. i think it is more
                 a case of romantic anti-rationalism. although "ironically"
                 the man in metal perhaps puts this best: "Don't be too proud
                 of this technological terror ... insignificant next to the
                 power of the Force." ... That's part of the reason it seemed
                 leem when the whole midichlorlian thing came up. ok tnx.--psb
Cache (3529 bytes)
csua.org/u/c2r -> movies.yahoo.com/mv/news/ap/20050515/111618582000.html
Star Wars" to piq ue European ire over the state of world relations and the United States' role in it. Lucas' themes of democracy on the skids and a ruler preaching war to pres erve the peace predate "Star Wars: Episode III Revenge of the Sith" by a lmost 30 years. Yet viewers Sunday and Lucas himself noted similarities between the final chapter of his sci-fi saga and our own troubled times. Cannes audiences made blunt comparisons between "Revenge of the Sith" the story of Anakin Skywalker's fall to the dark side and the rise of an em peror through warmongering to President Bush's war on terrorism and the invasion of Iraq. The line echoes Bush's international ultimatum after the Sept. "That quote is almost a perfect citation of Bush," said Liam Engle, a 23- year-old French-American aspiring filmmaker. "Plus, you've got a politic ian trying to increase his power to wage a phony war." Though the plot was written years ago, "the anti-Bush diatribe is clearly there," Engle said. The film opens Wednesday in parts of Europe and Thursday in the United St ates and many other countries. At the Cannes premiere Sunday night, acto rs in white stormtrooper costumes paraded up and down the red carpet as guests strolled in, while an orchestra played the "Star Wars" theme. Lucas said he patterned his story after historical transformations from f reedom to fascism, never figuring when he started his prequel trilogy in the late 1990s that current events might parallel his space fantasy. "As you go through history, I didn't think it was going to get quite this close. So it's just one of those recurring things," Lucas said at a Can nes news conference. "Maybe the film will waken people to the situation," Lucas joked. That comment echoes Moore's rhetoric at Cannes last year, when his anti-B ush documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11" won the festival's top honor. Unlike Moore, whose Cannes visit came off like an anybody-but-Bush campai gn stop, Lucas never mentioned the president by name but was eager to sp eak his mind on US policy in Iraq, careful again to note that he creat ed the story long before the Bush-led occupation there. "When I wrote it, Iraq didn't exist," Lucas said, laughing. "We were just funding Saddam Hussein and giving him weapons of mass destr uction. We were going a fter Iran and using him as our surrogate, just as we were doing in Vietn am. The parallels between what we did in Vietnam and what we're doin g in Iraq now are unbelievable." The prequel trilogy is based on a back-story outline Lucas created in the mid-1970s for the original three "Star Wars" movies, so the themes perc olated out of the Vietnam War and the Nixon-Watergate era, he said. Lucas began researching how democracies can turn into dictatorships with full consent of the electorate. In ancient Rome, "why did the senate after killing Caesar turn around and give the government to his nephew?" "Why did France after t hey got rid of the king and that whole system turn around and give it to Napoleon? "You sort of see these recurring themes where a democracy turns itself in to a dictatorship, and it always seems to happen kind of in the same way , with the same kinds of issues, and threats from the outside, needing m ore control. A democratic body, a senate, not being able to function pro perly because everybody's squabbling, there's corruption." The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, bro adcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.
Cache (1016 bytes)
www.filibustercartoons.com/archive.php?id=20050511
Last night the Canadian Parliament voted non-confidence in the administra tion of Prime Minister Paul Martin, 153 to 150. The Conservatives had ma naged to get a non-confidence motion attached as a rider to another piec e of legislation, thus making the vote come much earlier than expected. Martin says he will not accept the vote and will not step down and c all new elections. He doesn't consider the vote to be binding because it took the form of a rider and not a formal motion. Someday, he says, the parliament will have a chance to have a "real" confidence vote, but God knows when that will be. THEY considered last nigh t's vote to be "formal" enough for them. Conservative leader Stephen Har per has even basically declared Paul Martin to be an illegitimate and da ngerous Prime Minister because of his refusal to step down. Filibuster Cartoons version 30 - Design copyright 2003 Jaco Joubert - Al l original images copyright 2001-2003 JJ McCullough - Non-original image s copyright their respective owner.