3/17 Is Latex still the defacto standard in academia/papers/publications?
\- yes, esp pdflatex.
\_ latex, dvips, Distiller is the standard in my field, not
pdflatex - some argue that Adobe, having invented ps and pdf,
generates the highest quality pdf. I realize this is not free.
\- i just meant i see .ps and .pdf files provided more often
than i am seeing .dvi left around today.
\_ Yes, at least in CS/EE. Most conferences provide LaTeX templates
(all conferences to which I have submitted), but rarely do I see
well-crafted ones for other formats. There are lots of great
reasons to use LaTeX but in the academic realm, probably the most
important is that most academic bibliographies are in BibTeX format.
\_ and the ease of typesetting high quality mathematical
equations.
\_ Well, there are lots of science/engineering pubs that
don't need equations (although of course LaTeX rocks at
those), but very few don't need bibliographies.
\_ Physics and Astronomy use LaTeX, but I'm told biological sciences
prefer MS Word. Go figure.
\_ biologists have no need, or patience, for the features
that LaTeX offers.
\_ Yes, it's proven to be more effective than lamb skin. |