| WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ | |
 http://csua.com/feed/ | |
| ||||||
| 5/24 |
| 2005/3/11 [Transportation/Car/RoadHogs] UID:36645 Activity:high |
3/11 Drive a car, support Republicans:
http://www.choosetheblue.com/mainFrame.php?prodcat=Gasoline
http://www.choosetheblue.com/mainFrame.php?prodcat=Auto+Makers
\_ Fox news is blue!
http://tinyurl.com/68odo
I'm skeptical.
\_ My SUV, my car. Keep your laws off my property. P.S. I'm driving
and you suckers can walk. Nyah nyah nyah -conservative
\_ I want to build a coal fired power plant in my backyard, right
next door to you. Gotta problem with that?
\_ Keep your laws of my property is not incompatible
w/ the belief that an individuals private property
use should not interefe your neighbor's use of his
private property. The expectation that one should
be free in his own land from interference by the
gov. and ones neighbors necessarily means that
one must refrain from activities that would
interfere w/ the ability of ones neighbors to
use their land similarly.
A coal fired power plant would be a private (if not
public nuisance) and pp would be entitled to an
injunction.
\_ Your SUV is a public nuisance that operates on public
highways and uses my tax money to be a pain in the ass.
I have far more right to demand regulation of your
vehicle than you do to try and control what I do
in my own back yard. Hypocrite.
\_ The assertion that an SUV is a public nuisance
is debatable. A public nuisance is generally
\_ It's not, I can't see past them. They endanger my
drive, in addition to making it less efficient and
costlier, by preventing me from planning for
traffic conditions ahead. This also applies to
semis and vans and pickup trucks, which, like SUVs,
can be excused if their size is actually needed
(like by gardeners, handymen, etc.) -John
\_ People NEED SUV to protect their frail egos.
It is a lot cheaper than seeing shrinks.
something fixed on a piece of property that
posses a threat to the health and safety of
the nearby community. A vehicle does not meet
this critera. Even if we assume that an SUV
meets the critera, it is debatable whether
an SUV posses any healty or safety risk. Many
would contend that SUVs are safer than regular
cars. In contrast your coal burning plant is
fixed next door to "mr conservative's" home
and will substantially affect him. Note that
if he were to put in such a structure, the
general principle provides you the same
remedy.
BTW, I am not "mr conservative", I don't own an
SUV, and I have no plans to purchase/rent one
unless I find myself on safari in central
Africa w/o a nearby subaru dealer.
\_ You will die in a car accident soon, fucker.
\_ If he's in an SUV and you're on bike on in a little Honda
or Toyota, I think you'll be the one losing.
\_ Precisely the definition of a nuisance.
\_ No, He'll flip over the side of the mountain and die the
fucker that he is.
\_ Now I'm happy, I have a Mazda that usually runs Chevon.
\_ Yay. I have a honda and an infiniti. Guess I need to start buying
Shell.
\_ Yah...I drive Toyota and pump Shell gas.
\_ Why does a company contribute to both parties?
\_ Hedging |
| 5/24 |
|
| www.choosetheblue.com/mainFrame.php?prodcat=Gasoline Valero Energy Valero Energy 15% 85% $95,666 $542,108 Diamond Shamrock Brands belonging to companies without PACs and where the total federal po litical contributions from employees is less than $15,000 are listed in black text. org) as available on Dece mber 12, 2004, unless otherwise noted. com has not indepe ndently validated the data, takes no responsibility for any errors or om issions, and assumes no responsibility to update the data. com and the Center for Responsive Pol itics or the Federal Election Commission, and use of such data does not imply their endorsement. Note that hard money federal political contri butions by corporations and labor unions generally are prohibited by law For more information about the data presented, please see the "FAQ" se ction of this website. |
| www.choosetheblue.com/mainFrame.php?prodcat=Auto+Makers Brands belonging to companies without PACs and where the total federal po litical contributions from employees is less than $15,000 are listed in black text. org) as available on Dece mber 12, 2004, unless otherwise noted. com has not indepe ndently validated the data, takes no responsibility for any errors or om issions, and assumes no responsibility to update the data. com and the Center for Responsive Pol itics or the Federal Election Commission, and use of such data does not imply their endorsement. Note that hard money federal political contri butions by corporations and labor unions generally are prohibited by law For more information about the data presented, please see the "FAQ" se ction of this website. |
| tinyurl.com/68odo -> www.choosetheblue.com/mainFrame.php?prodcat=Television+Content+Providers Brands belonging to companies without PACs and where the total federal po litical contributions from employees is less than $15,000 are listed in black text. org) as available on Dece mber 12, 2004, unless otherwise noted. com has not indepe ndently validated the data, takes no responsibility for any errors or om issions, and assumes no responsibility to update the data. com and the Center for Responsive Pol itics or the Federal Election Commission, and use of such data does not imply their endorsement. Note that hard money federal political contri butions by corporations and labor unions generally are prohibited by law For more information about the data presented, please see the "FAQ" se ction of this website. |