Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 36632
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/05/25 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/25    

2005/3/10 [Science/GlobalWarming, Science/Physics] UID:36632 Activity:nil
3/10    Berkeley physicist Charles Townes wins Templeton prize for "advancing
        knowledge in spiritual matters".  News link:
        http://www.physorg.com/news3317.html and here's a link to the
        essay that is primarily responsible for him winning the prize:
        http://www.science-spirit.org/articles/Articledetail.cfm?article_ID=13
        The subject of the relationship between science and religion has come
        up a few times on the motd, so this seems relevant.
2025/05/25 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/25    

You may also be interested in these entries...
2013/5/7-18 [Science/Physics] UID:54674 Activity:nil
5/7     http://www.technologyreview.com/view/514581/government-lab-reveals-quantum-internet-operated-continuously-for-over-two-years
        This is totally awesome.
        "equips each node in the network with quantum transmitters–i.e.,
        lasers–but not with photon detectors which are expensive and bulky"
        \_ The next phase of the project should be stress-testing with real-
           world confidential data by NAMBLA.
	...
2012/12/4-18 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:54545 Activity:nil
12/4    "Carbon pollution up to 2 million pounds a second"
        http://www.csua.org/u/yk6 (news.yahoo.com)
        Yes, that's *a second*.
        \_ yawn.
        \_ (12/14) "AP-GfK Poll: Science doubters say world is warming"
        \_ (12/14)
	...
2013/4/29-5/18 [Science/Physics] UID:54664 Activity:nil
4/29    "Speed of Light May Not Be Constant, Phycisists Say"
        http://www.csua.org/u/100d (news.yahoo.com)
        "Two papers ...... attempt to derive the speed of light from the
        quantum properties of space itself."  (i.e. instead of measuring it)
	...
2013/3/14-5/5 [Science/Physics] UID:54626 Activity:nil
3/14    "Confirmed! Newfound Particle Is the Higgs"
        http://news.yahoo.com/confirmed-newfound-particle-higgs-130317830.html
        GREAT!!
        \_ so, what's next?
           \_ "Q: Why does Higgs Boson have mass?"
	...
2012/7/2-27 [Science/Physics] UID:54426 Activity:nil
7/2     http://news.yahoo.com/apnewsbreak-proof-god-particle-found-131226045.html
        URL says it all.
        \_ A comic video helps explain it: http://www.csua.org/u/wxa
	...
2011/7/26-8/2 [Science/Physics] UID:54145 Activity:nil
7/26    "Hong Kong scientists 'show time travel is impossible'"
        http://www.csua.org/u/tvp (news.yahoo.com)
        \_ Rest of World Emits Collective 'duh'
        \_ I'm no physics wizard.  They may have proven that a single photon
           does not travel faster than c.  But how does this imply that
           no physical object can travel faster than c?  And how does that
	...
2010/9/7-30 [Science/GlobalWarming, Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:53949 Activity:nil
9/5     "Report: Castro blasts Ahmadinejad as anti-Semitic" - Yahoo! News:
        http://www.csua.org/u/rji
        "HAVANA - Fidel Castro criticized Iranian President Mahmoud
        Ahmadinejad for what he called his anti-Semitic attitudes and
        questioned his own actions during the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962
        during interviews with an American journalist he summoned to Havana to
	...
2010/9/8-30 [Science/Physics] UID:53950 Activity:nil
9/5     String Theory and God.
        http://www.web-books.com/GoodPost/Articles/SeeGod.htm
        \_ "My specialty was in biophysics, not in theoretical physics,"  That
           sums up the rest of his articles - a big copy-and-paste job of
           fragments that he doesn't really understand.
	...
Cache (8192 bytes)
www.physorg.com/news3317.html
com Survey The survey takes less than two minutes, there's nothing to identify you p ersonally, and you won't receive any email or other sales pitches by par ticipating. Charles Townes, the Nobel laureate whose inventions include the maser and laser and who has spent decades as a leading advocate for the convergen ce of science and religion, has won the 2005 Templeton Prize. Townes, 89, secured his place in the pantheon of great 20th-century scien tists through his investigations into the properties of microwaves which resulted first in the maser, a device which amplifies electromagnetic w aves, and later his co-invention of the laser, which amplifies and direc ts light waves into parallel direct beams. News archive His research, for which he shared the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1964, ope ned the door for an astonishing array of inventions and discoveries now in common use throughout the world in medicine, telecommunications, elec tronics, computers, and other areas. It was the 1966 publication of his seminal article, The Convergence of Sc ience and Religion in the IBM journal THINK, however, that established T ownes as a unique voice - especially among scientists - that sought comm onality between the two disciplines. Long before the concept of a relati onship between scientific and theological inquiry became an accepted are na of investigation, his nonconformist viewpoint jumpstarted a movement that until then few had considered and even fewer comprehended. So rare was such a viewpoint at the time that Townes admitted in the paper that his position would be considered by many in both camps to be extreme. No netheless, he proposed, their differences are largely superficial, andth e two become almost indistinguishable if we look at the real nature of e ach. The article was generated from a talk delivered by Townes in 1964 before a congregation at New Yorks famed Riverside Church, known for its embrac e of groundbreaking perspectives on philosophy, theology and social acti vism. The Templeton Prize for Progress Toward Research or Discoveries about Spi ritual Realities was founded in 1972 by pioneering global investor and p hilanthropist Sir John Templeton. Given each year to a living person to encourage and honor those who advance knowledge in spiritual matters and valued at 795,000 pounds sterling, the Templeton Prize is the worlds be st known religion prize and the largest annual monetary prize given to a n individual. The prizes monetary value is in keeping with Sir Johns sti pulation that it always be worth more than the Nobel Prizes to underscor e his belief that research and advances in spiritual discoveries can be quantifiably more significant than those recognized by the Nobels. The Duke of Edinburgh will award the prize to Townes in a private ceremon y at Buckingham Palace on May 4th. Townes says he intends to give a majo r portion of the prize money to Furman University, with substantial amou nts to also go to the Pacific School of Religion, the Center for Theolog y and the Natural Sciences, the Berkeley Ecumenical Chaplaincy to the Ho meless, and the First Congregational Church of Berkeley. In remarks prepared for the news conference, Townes said, Science and rel igion have had a long history of interesting interaction. But when I was younger, that interaction did not seem like a very healthy one. Townes, Professor in the Graduate School at the University of California at Berkeley, noted that, as a graduate student at the California Institu te of Technology, the professor directing his research jumped on me for being religiously oriented. After the THINK article was reprinted in The Technology Review, published by the Massachusetts Institute of Technolo gy, the journals editor received a letter from a prominent alumnus who t hreatened to have nothing more to do with MIT if it ever again printed a nything like it on religion. Rather than being dampened by such hostility, Townes said it only further stoked his interest, a burning issue he continues to aggressively exami ne in books, journals and lectures at venues ranging from UNESCO to the worlds major institutes of higher learning. I believe there is no long-r ange question more important than the purpose and meaning of our lives a nd our universe, Townes said in his remarks, noting that the Templeton P rize founder had been particularly instrumental in that work. Sir John h as very much stimulated its thoughtful consideration, particularly encou raging open and useful discussion of spirituality and the meaning of lif e by scientists. Charles Hard Townes was born in Greenville, South Carolina in 1915 to Ell en and Henry Townes, an attorney. Raised in a Baptist household that emb raced an open-minded approach to biblical interpretation, Townes receive d a BA in modern languages and a BS in physics summa cum laude from Furman University in Greenville when he was 19. Two years later, he rece ived an MA in physics from Duke and, in 1939, a PhD in physics from the California Institute of Technology with a thesis on isotope separati on and nuclear spins. That same year, Townes became a member of the technical staff at Bell Lab s, the powerhouse of modern technology that produced such advances as th e transistor, solar cells, and fiber optics, where he specialized in mic rowave generation, vacuum tubes, and solid-state physics. During World W ar II, he helped develop radar systems that effectively performed in the humid conditions of the Pacific Theater. After the war, he became associate professor of physics at Columbia Unive rsity and met Arthur L Schawlow, who had come to the university on a fe llowship and became Townes research assistant. The two would eventually combine their energies (and, coincidentally, become brothers-in-law) to make major advances in the field of microwave spectroscopy, including de signing masers and lasers in the 1950s. Townes often cites his discovery of the principles of the maser - an insi ght that suddenly occurred to him as he sat on a park bench in Washingto n, DC in 1951 - as a revelation as real as any revelation described in the scriptures, and as a striking example of the interplay of how and w hy that both science and religion must recognize. In nominating Townes to the international, interfaith panel of nine judge s that awards the prize, David Shi, president of Furman University, wrot e, He points out that both scientists and theologians seek truth that tr anscends current human understanding, and because both are human perspec tives trying to explain and to find meaning in the universe, both are fr aught with uncertainty. Scientists propose hypotheses from postulates, f rom ideas that ultimately cannot be proven. Shi added, Charles Townes helped to create and sustain the dialogue betwe en science and theology. Thus he has made a profound contribution to the world's progress in understanding - and embracing - the wonder of God's creation. Townes, who became an Officer of the French Legion of Honor in 1990, is a lso the recipient of the Niels Bohr International Gold Medal and nearly 100 other honors and awards, and holds honorary degrees from more than 2 5 universities. During the administration of Ronald Reagan, he served as a member of the Committee on the Contributions of the Behavioral and So cial Sciences to the Prevention of Nuclear War and, as chairman of Reaga ns commission on the MX missile, helped convince the president to reject widespread placement of that weapon. Most recently, Townes has been a champion of optical searches for extrate rrestrial intelligence, using methods he first proposed in a paper in th e journal Nature in 1961, one year after scientists had launched the fir st search for radio transmissions from distant solar systems. His curren t work uses lasers to help combine images from distant telescopes. Towne s most recent book, How the Laser Happened: Adventures of a Scientist, w as published in 1999 to wide acclaim. Townes and his wife of 63 years, the former Frances H Brown, live in Ber keley, California. They are the parents of four daughters and six grandc hildren. id=60888 Related stories: * Father of Regene...
Cache (6527 bytes)
www.science-spirit.org/articles/Articledetail.cfm?article_ID=13
Printer Friendly Version The Convergence of Science and Religion By Charles Townes Nobel laureate Charles Townes, inventor of the laser and maser, sees scie nce and religion on the road to an inevitable reconciliation after centuries of forced separation. The success of science has posed many challenges and conflicts for religi on conflicts which individuals resolve in different ways. Some believe r eligion and science deal with quite different matters by different metho ds, and thus separate the realms so widely in their thinking that no dir ect confrontation is possible. Some repair completely to the camp of sci ence or of religion and regard the other as of little importance, if not downright harmful. To me science and religion are both universal, and basically very similar . In fact, to make the argument clear, I should like to adopt the rather extreme point of view that their differences are largely superficial, a nd that the two become almost indistinguishable when we look at the real nature of each. Pride Before a Fall The march of science during the 18th and 19th centuries produced enormous confidence in its success and generality. One field after another fell before objective inquiry, the experimental approach, and the logic of sc ience. Scientific laws appeared to possess an absolute quality, and it w as very easy to be convinced that science in time would explain everythi ng. This was the time when Laplace could say that if he knew the positio n and velocity of every particle in the universe, and could calculate su fficiently well, he could predict the entire future. Many vestiges of th is 19^th-century scientific absolutism linger in our thinking and attitu des today. Towards the end of the 19th century, many physical scientists viewed thei r work as almost complete, needing only some extension and more detailed refinement. Soon after, however, serious problems began to appear profo und difficulties that ultimately revolutionized the conceptual bases of science. For example, the question whether light consists of small particles shot out by light sources, or of wave disturbances originated by them, had be en debated for some time by the great figures of science. The question w as finally "settled" in the early 19th century by experiments showing li ght was unequivocally a wave and not particles. But about 1900, other ex periments showed just as unequivocally that light is a stream of particl es rather than a wave! Thus physicists were presented with a deeply dist urbing paradox. Its solution took several decades, and was only accompli shed in the mid-1920s by the development of a new set of ideas known as quantum mechanics. Physicists today believe that light is neither precisely a wave nor a par ticle, but both, and that we were mistaken in even asking the question, "Is light a particle or is it a wave?" S o can all matter, including baseballs and locomotives. We dont ordinaril y observe this duality in large objects because they do not show wave pr operties prominently. Acceptance of Uncertainty Another strange aspect of the new quantum mechanics is called the uncerta inty principle. This principle shows that if we try to say exactly where a particle (or object) is, we cannot say exactly how fast it is going a nd in what direction, all at the same time; or, if we determine its velo city, we can never say exactly what its position is. If he were alive today, he would probably unders tand that it is fundamentally impossible to obtain the information neces sary for his precise predictions, even if he were dealing with only one single particle, much less the entire universe. The modern laws of science seem, then, to have turned our thinking away f rom complete determinism and towards a world where chance plays a major role. It is chance on an atomic scale, but there are situations and time s when the random change in position of one atom or one electron can mat erially affect the large-scale affairs of life. A striking example invol ves Queen Victoria who, through one such event on an atomic scale, becam e a mutant and passed on to certain male descendants in Europes royal fa milies the trait of hemophilia. Thus one unpredictable event on an atomi c scale had an effect, through an afflicted tsarevich, on the stability of the Russian throne and the subsequent history of the entire century. Scientists have now become a good deal more cautious and modest about ext ending scientific ideas into realms where they have not yet been thoroug hly tested. We know today that the most sophisticated scientific theorie s, including modern quantum mechanics, are still incomplete. We use them because in certain areas they are so amazingly right just as the laws o f Newton and Maxwell are still essentially correct in their own sphere. Yet they lead us at times into inconsistencies which we do not understan d, and where we must recognize that we have missed some crucial idea. We simply accept the paradoxes and hope that in the future they will be re solved by a more complete understanding. In fact, by recognizing these p aradoxes clearly and studying them, we can perhaps best understand the l imitations in our thinking and correct them. Seeking Order, Seeking Purpose With this background in mind, we come to the similarity of science and re ligion. The goal of science is to discover the order in the universe and to understand through it the things we sense around us, including man h imself. This order we express as scientific principles or laws, striving to state them in the simplest and yet most inclusive ways. The goal of religion may be stated, I believe, as an understanding (and hence accept ance) of the purpose and meaning of our universe and how we fit into it. Most religions see a unifying and inclusive origin of meaning, and this supreme purposeful force we call God. Understanding the order in the un iverse and understanding the purpose in the universe are not identical, but they are also not very far apart. We must also expect paradoxes, and not be surprised or unduly troubled by them. We know of p aradoxes in physics, such as that concerning the nature of light, which have been resolved by deeper understanding. In the realm of religion, we are troubled by the sufferi ng around us and its apparent inconsistency with a God of love. Such par adoxes confronting science do not usually destroy our faith in science. They simply remind us of our limited understanding, and at times provide a key to learning more.