Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 36124
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
2018/03/24 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular

2005/2/10 [Computer/SW/Security] UID:36124 Activity:kinda low
2/9     just a coincidence with thread below...
        The Genocide That Wasn't: Ward Churchill's Research Fraud
        \_ I've also read some funny stuff about how he goes around
           claiming to be a member of various indian tribes, none of
           which, it turns out, have him listed as a member.
           \_ Yeah, like most nutjobs, his screeds have brought him attention
              and scrutiny that wouldn't have happened elsewere, exposing his
              *factual* errors instead of just his nutjob opinions.
2018/03/24 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular

You may also be interested in these entries...
2012/9/20-11/7 [Finance/Investment, Computer/SW/Unix] UID:54482 Activity:nil
9/20    How do I change my shell? chsh says "Cannot change ID to root."
        \_ /usr/bin/chsh does not have the SUID permission set. Without
           being set, it does not successfully change a user's shell.
           Typical newbie sys admin (on soda)
           \_ Actually, it does: -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 37552 Feb 15  2011 /usr/bin/chsh
2012/5/8-6/4 [Computer/SW/Unix] UID:54383 Activity:nil
5/8     Hello everyone!  This is Josh Hawn, CSUA Tech VP for Spring 2012.
        About 2 weeks ago, someone brought to my attention that our script
        to periodically merge /etc/motd.public into /etc/motd wasn't
        running.  When I looked into it, the cron daemon was running, but
        there hadn't been any root activity in the log since April 7th.  I
        looked into it for a while, but got lost in other things I was
2012/2/9-3/26 [Computer/SW/Security, Computer/SW/Unix] UID:54305 Activity:nil
2/9     Reminder: support for mail services has been deprecated for *several
        years*. Mail forwarding, specifically .forward mail forwarding, is
        officially supported and was never deprecated.
        \_ There is no .forward under ~root.  How do we mail root and how do
           we get responses?
           \_ is and always has been an alias.
2011/9/14-12/28 [Computer/SW/Unix] UID:54172 Activity:nil
9/12    We've restored CSUA NFS to something vaguely resembling normal
        functionality -- plus, with some luck, we should now have something
        vaguely resembling normal uptime, too!  Ping if you
        notice any problems.  --jordan
        \_  Oh, and http://irc.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU is online again.
2011/11/16-12/28 [Computer/HW, Academia/Berkeley/CSUA] UID:54230 Activity:nil
11/16   We'll be taking all CSUA machines offline in the near future for a Soda
        Hall server room reorganization (we're being moved to a neighboring
        server cabinet).  Downtime will hopefully be minimal.  --jordan
        \_ Thanks for all your work keeping the machines running!  It's
           been awesome having soda actually working again.
        \_ Update:  this is tentatively scheduled for Saturday afternoon.
2011/6/5-8/27 [Computer/HW/Memory] UID:54127 Activity:nil
6/5     In an effort to stabilize our services, we'll be rebuilding parts of
        the CSUA infrastructure over the course of this summer.  To give us
        some wiggle room, I've temporarily decreased soda's allocated RAM from
        8GB to 2GB.  If you need to run something that requires large amounts
        of memory, please send mail to and we'll try to
        accommodate your request.  --jordan
2011/8/9-27 [Computer/SW/Editors/Emacs, Academia/Berkeley/CSUA] UID:54162 Activity:nil
8/9     So I just found out that an old college friend of mine lost her
        four month old daughter to SIDS. What is the correct response here?
        \_ "Did she sleep with her belly?" and "Did you breastfeed?"
        \_ try this joke:
           How do you make a dead baby float?
           ˙ʎqɐq pɐǝp ɟo sdooɔs oʍʇ puɐ ɹǝǝqʇooɹ ɟo ƃnɯ ɐ
Cache (8192 bytes)
edu Abstract: This is a work in progress that I am making available due to the current interest in Ward Churchills writings. I show that Churchill has committ ed research fraud, and very possibly committed perjury as well. This art icle analyzes Churchills fabrication of a genocide. Churchill invented a story about the US Army deliberately creating a smallpox epidemic amon g the Mandan people in 1837 by distributing infected blankets. While the re was a smallpox epidemic on the Plains in 1837, it was entirely accide ntal, the Army wasnt involved, and nearly every element of Churchills story is a total invention. My goal here was to show how and why Churchi ll engaged in such blatant fraud, and why no one has challenged him on i t until now. Few historians would dispute that during the Plains Ind ian wars, selected US military forces did perpetuate massacres that ca n easily be construed as genocidal in intent. Furthermore, it is well-es tablished that the British general Lord Amherst at least considered dist ributing smallpox-infected goods to Indians in 1763with explicitly geno cidal intentand that his plan was carried out independently by his subo rdinates. In a series of essays written during the 1990s, Churchill gradually elaborates his story of the origins of the smallpox epidemic t hat broke out on the northern plains in 1837, which probably killed at l east 20 to 30,000 people. Churchill charges the US Army with deliberat ely infecting the Mandan tribe with gifts of smallpox-laden blankets, wi thholding treatment, and thus causing an epidemic that Churchill says ki lled more than 125,000 people. Ward Churchills habit of plagiarism and research fraud was well-document ed by John Lavelle. Churchills tale of the Mandan genocide is but one more example. The first goal of this article will be to set the his torical record straight, by comparing Churchills deliberately falsified version of events against the evidence, and by attempting to determine the actual cause of the 1837 smallpox epidemic. More crucially, I want t o examine the political and cultural influences that lead to frauds such as Churchills, and to ask why Churchills fantasies take root among sc holars who should know better. Ward Churchills Version of the Smallpox Outbreak among the Mandans Churchill first advanced his tale of the Mandan genocide in 1992, in the context of a brief supporting a motion to dismiss charges against Chur chill and other activists, who were being tried for having disrupted a C olumbus Day parade in Denver the year before. In Churchills trial brief , he claimed immunity from the state laws under which he was being prose cuted. Churchill made the argument that protesting the parade was tantam ount to combating genocide, and was thus his legal duty under internatio nal law. At Fort Clark on the upper Missouri Riverthe US Army distributed small pox-laden blankets as gifts among the Mandan. The blankets had been gath ered from a military infirmary in St. Louis where troops infected with t he disease were quarantined. Although the medical practice of the day re quired the precise opposite procedure, army doctors ordered the Mandans to disperse once they exhibited symptoms of infection. The result was a pandemic among the Plains Indian nations which claimed at least 125,000 lives, and may have reached a toll several times that number. It is enlightening to compare Thorntons rendition with Churchills. Thornton locates the origins of the epidemic in a ste amboat traveling the Missouri River (94): Steamboats had been traveling the upper Missouri River for years before 1 837, dispatched by Saint Louis fur companies for trade with the Mandan a nd other Indians. At 3:00 PM on June 19, 1837, the American Fur Compan y steamboat St. Peters arrived at the Mandan villages after stopping at Fort Clark just downstream. Some aboard the steamer had smallpox when t he boat docked. It soon was spread to the Mandan, perhaps by deckhands w ho unloaded merchandise, perhaps by chiefs who went aboard a few days la ter, or perhaps by women and children who went aboard at the same time. Thornton locates t he site of infection at the Mandan village, not at Fort Clark. Nowhere does Thornton mention a mil itary infirmary in St. Louis where troops infected with the disease were quarantined. Nowhere does Thornton mention the distribution of smallp ox-laden blankets as gifts. On the contraryThornton clearly hypothesiz es the origins of the epidemic as being entirely accidental. Citing Thornton, Churchill holds that the pandemic claimed at least 125, 000 lives, and may have reached a toll several times that number. But T hornton counts only 20,400 dead from a variety of tribes, plus many Osa ge, and three fifths of the north-central California Indians (probably an exaggeration). In other words, Thornton counts no more than 30,000 dead at most. Considering that Churchill wrote this initial story as part of a trial br ief, it would appear that he may well have committed perjury, which is a felony under Colorado law. Churchill would go on to invent new details for his story. Churchill publ ished his 1992 trial brief as part of an essay collection in 1994. In 19 98, Churchill revisited his Mandan genocide story in a new collection of essays, A Little Matter of Genocide. Churchill addresses the Lord Amher st affair of 1763, in which British colonial forces may have indeed dist ributed smallpox-infected goods to Indians in New England. Churchill arg ues that Amherst: was by no means a singular incident, although it is the best documented. Only slightly more ambiguous was the US Armys dispensing of trade b lankets to Mandans and other Indians gathered at Fort Clark, on the Mis souri River in present-day North Dakota, beginning on June 20, 1837. Far from being trade goods, the blankets had been taken from a military inf irmary in St. Louis quarantined for smallpox, and brought upriver aboard the steamboat St. When the first Indians showed symptoms of th e disease on July 14, the post surgeon advised those camped near the pos t to scatter and seek sanctuary in the villages of healthy relativest here is no conclusive figure as to how many Indians diedbut estimates r un as high as 100,000. In this version, Churchill elaborates on his initial version, adding new details. Churchill implies th at this character strategically encouraged the Indians to scatter and th us spread the disease. Churchill has also downgraded his outside estimat e of the number of victims to only as high as 100,000. Another example of Churchills difficult relationship with the truth can be found in a footnote. Here Churchill charges Howard Peckham wi th suppressing the Amherst story during the 1930s. What Churchill fail s to explain is how a historian in the 1930s could possibly have suppres sed a story that has been in print since 1851, when Francis Parkman firs t reported it. Churchill attributes the suppression story to Donald Grin de, another neo-Indian historian. One wonders how Churchilla su pposedly expert author of a book on Indian genocidecould be so totally ignorant of such a well-known source as Parkman. Churchills tale of genocide by means of biological warfare is shocking. The only truth in Churchills version of the pandemic is the fact that a smallpox outbreak did occur in 1837, an d that it was probably carried into the region on board the steamboat St . Every other detail of Churchills story must have come from his imagination, because his own sources contradict him on nearly every poi nt. None of the sources that Churchill cites make any mention of a military infirmaryquarantined for smallpox. None of the sources Churchill cites make any mention of US Army soldiers even being in the area of the pa ndemic, much less being involved with it in any way. Churchills own sou rces make it clear that Fort Clark was not an Army garrison. It was a re mote trading outpost that was privately owned and built by the American Fur Company, and manned by a handful of white traders. Not being an Army fort, it did not contain a post surgeon who told Indians to scatter and sprea d the disease. Churchills own sources make...
Cache (3160 bytes) -> HAL.LAMAR.EDU/~browntf/
The Genocide That Wasnt: Ward Churchills Research Fraud Abstract: This paper shows that Churchill has committed research fraud, and very po ssibly committed perjury as well. Churchill invented a story about the US Army deliberately c reating a smallpox epidemic among the Mandan people in 1837 by distribut ing infected blankets. While there was a smallpox epidemic on the Plains in 1837, it was entirely accidental, the Army wasnt involved, and near ly every element of Churchills story is a total invention. My goal here was to show how and why Churchill engaged in such blatant fraud, and wh y no one has challenged him on it until now. Coming soon: An analysis of Ward Churchills genealogical fraud. Abstract: Comparing Ward Churchills public claims about his ancestors to his actua l genealogy, you immediately find indications that Churchill knows there is a problem. Churchill challenges people to go on a wild goose chase, naming individuals from whom he is not descended and suggesting that the y be researched. Churchills claims of being 3/16 Cherokee on his mother s side are totally contradicted by the historical evidence. Every ances tor of Churchills that we located was white, in every historical docu ment we examined, including all eight of his maternal great-great-grandp arents. The single ancestor that Churchill has named as a CherokeeJoshu a Tynerwas a white man who fought against the Cherokee side during the Revolutionary War. edu Phone: 409-880-8378 (please email insteadI pick up the phone when Im in the office, but I rarely receive voice mails) Fax: 409-880-2324 Office: Maes Liberal Arts Building, # O-61 (second floor), Beaumont campu s Hours: During the Spring, 2005 semester, office hours are 4-5PM. Im usua lly in my office between 2-5PM most afternoons, but its safest to eithe r make an appointment or else call ahead to make sure Im in. Famous People Who Majored in Sociology Contemplating earning a degree in Sociology? African-American class structure in historical perspective iv. Culture and the Political Economy of Petrochemical Polluti on on the Gulf Coast Research in Progress i Nationalism Without Nations: Ethnic Nationalist Movem ents in the US ii. Towards a Hermeneutics of Racial-Ethnic Categories in US History iv. The Smell of Money: Corporate Hegemony and Environmental C rime on the Gulf Coast Online Papers i South Asians in the Colonial Chesapeake (coming soon) ii. The Great Wave: Price Revolutions and the Rhythm of Hi story (book review) E Current Service Work i Chair, Faculty Arts and Sciences Council ii. Board of Directors, American Civil Liberties Union, Sabine Pass Chapter iv. Community Advisory Panel, Beaumont Industrial Park v Atofina Community Advisory Panel The views and opinions expressed in this document are strictly those of t he author and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the State of Texas, the Regents or officials of The Texas State University System, the Lamar University Administration, any Lamar University colleg e or department, or any recognized Lamar University organization. Commen ts on the contents of this document should be directed to the author.