2/6 Hey MOTD -- My car is going to die soon, and I was wondering if anyone
has any suggestions for replacements. My car is a 1998 ford taurus,
24v Duratec engine. It has good power, is very roomy, and was very
reliable until it hit 100k miles. I'm not married to another ford
(or even to an american), but I can't really afford more than $30k
(and 30 is really the upper end). Ideally, I'd like something similar.
TIA.
\_ The Toyota Avalon is pretty nice. 280hp, roomy comparable to the
ford, decent features, hovering right at the $30k mark.
\_ Easy, get a Honda Accord or a Toyota Corolla. Relatively cheap,
dependable, and if you get the better models it'll hold up its
value. It should give you at least 10 years if not more.
\_ If you don't want to buy a bland Accord or Camry perhaps
you should consider a Subaru Legacy or Outback. Both would
fit w/in your budget (the basic Legacy/Outback is btwn $21K
and $25K, while the Legacy Turbo GT is btwn $26K and $30K).
I currently own a 2003 Outback Wagon (basic, $22K in 2003)
and I think that it is the best car I have ever owned.
Some drawbacks of a Subaru are (1) the AWD decreases your
gas mileage by 1 or 2 MPG over a non-AWD car such as a
Camry, (2) the tires are more expensive to replace than
on a Camry/Accord, (3) there aren't as many Subaru dealers
as Honda/Toyota, and (4) there isn't a good way to listen
to music from an iPod (no cassette player/line in).
The Mazda 6 (as mentioned below) is another alternative,
but I mainly chose the Outback over the 6 b/c the Outback
had more interior room so I could carry more mtbs.
--ranga
\_ specs please. MPG, 0-60, HP.
\_ Readily available on the subaru website. -OP
\_ the Accord beats Subaru on all 3 (MPG, speed, HP)
\_ This is true, but you should consider the
fact that the Subaru has AWD and can be
driven off road.
\_ mtbs = mountain bikes? doesn't that muddy up the car?
what's wrong a rack? and why did you choose the outback
over the legacy? the outback has significantly worse brakes.
\_ I haven't had a big problem w/ mud. The car came w/
a big rubber mat that can be washed out. I considered
a roof rack but I decided that most of the time I
could just get by w/o it by sticking my bike inside.
a big rubber mat that can be washed out.
I don't normally need to carry more than one bike,
so I didn't want to invest in a rack. When I need
to take more than 1 bike, I try to borrow a rack
from a friend.
The main reason I chose the outback over the legacy
was that the outback had 0% financing (legacy was
2.9%) and there was a dealer incentive of $600 so
over 2 yrs the outback worked out cheaper. The
outback also has slightly better ground clearance
and the dealer threw in the rdg for free which
helps if you want to drive it off road (which I
don't really do a lot of these days).
I didn't really know about the brakes when I
bought the car, so far I haven't noticed any
problems.
If I was buying today, I might still choose the
Outback b/c of the ground clearance but in all
other aspects the Legacy is preferable.
\_ Yeah I doubt the brake thing is that big a deal but
it was something my Dad considered when buying. The
Outback looks a lot flashier with the macho flared
fenders. I don't think most people really need
better ground clearance. I'm considering getting one
of the two myself. I like to be able to throw a bike
in the back of a car but I think I'd hesitate with
a nice carpeted trunk. I've used a truck a lot and
it always builds up dirt and mud back there. Maybe
if I got a tarp to cover everything back there... the
rubber mat thing I think only covers the very back.
\_ Prius.
\_ What about the Ford Five Hundred? It's supposed to be decent but
boring, and the dealers will probably have to add incentives.
\_ Does it have to be a brand new car? What's wrong with the
current one? It will definitely cost less to fix the one you
have and/or wait until it really dies. Camry, Altima, and Accord
compete with the Taurus along with Mazda 6 and similar. All are
under $30K. Personally, I'd think about buying a Lexus, even if
it is a year old. If not that then how about an Avalon? I have
firsthand experience with 2 Avalons and they are Lexus-lite.
\_ Nah, it doesn't have to be brand new. My current car might have
a busted head gasket. Cost to repair would exceed or equal the
kelly bluebook value.
\_ Yes, but still less than a new car. About $2K.
\_ Or, even better, seel the current jalopy to a junkyard
and buy another used card. http://acauction.com!
\_ Yah, that's pretty much my plan; I'm just polling
\_ Yah, that's pretty much my plan; I'm just trolling
to see what motd people are interested in, or have
experience with.
\_ Look buddy, $30K is a lot, do you really want to spend that
much money on something that will depreciate 1/4-1/3 of its
value the first year you buy it? Here is my recommendation.
Buy a decent USED Japanese car from someone (Civic, Accord),
and don't buy from dealers. You'll spend 1/2 of what you
originally planned and can save the other 1/2 for something
else nice, like kitchen/bathroom remodeling or save it for
your kids' college tuition.
Here is my second recommendation. If you MUST spend $30K,
you can get a car that has enough room for fat asses like
me (+200 pounds), has 255HP, ***37MPG***, and goes 0-60 in
6 seconds. It is called the Honda Accord Hybrid.
\_ "Nah, it doesn't have to be brand new." and
"Yah, that's pretty much my plan;". Did you even read the
thread, or are you just naturally this jerky?
\_ Basically, the last sentence is the only relevant piece of
information in your post for the OP's question.
\_ there's something really really really wrong with putting 255HP
in an oh-so-boring family sedan. It makes a lot of sense for a
sportscar, but Honda Accord? 0-60 in 6 sec? It is just wrong.
\_ What about Saturn? Any good? They have a neat little roadster
coming out for $25K. Another option: Mini-Cooper.
\_ Eh, neither is terribly roomy. Check out the original post. |