|
5/25 |
2005/1/28 [Politics/Domestic/SocialSecurity] UID:35943 Activity:high |
1/28 Krugman explains why Dubya's "blacks are shafted by social security" claim is false, and the origins of the claim: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/28/opinion/28krugman.html?oref=login&hp username/pw: gnugnugnu This is not to say that the Democrats who sent out the initial e-mail petition weren't dumbasses, because they were - and I'm not sure if even the truth can repair the damage. \_ wow, I must be a prophet. after my rambling about blacks and social security on the motd the other day, it's now all over the news. even bush is following up on my motd remarks. \_ Yeah, he uses the same faulty logic. If you work for 10 years and die, all that money you put into SS is gone, so a lower life expectancy means your family gets screwed from SS unless you own the account and your children can inherit it. \_ So what about all the white guys who worked for 11 years and died? They got slightly more screwed. And social security is so our old folks don't end up on the street eating from garbage cans, it is NOT a pension program. \_ Sorry, I screwed up in my analysis. Indeed, this might suggest that whites are being screwed, since they might live longer (hence being taxed more) and then die before age 65. \_ I hope someday you come to realize what a dumbass you are. \_ This is countered by the fact that more blacks than whites (percentage wise) are on disability. \_ The problem with the article is that is reasoned and well laid out. The sloganeering and "faith-based" logic of the Bush admin will always convince the 51% of the country that put the current set of neocon nuts in power of the veracity of whatever BS the admistration is peddling at the moment. admistration is peddling at the moment. See: death tax, tax administration is peddling at the moment. See: death tax, tax cuts, WMDs, clear skies, healthy forests, etc. |
5/25 |
|
www.nytimes.com/2005/01/28/opinion/28krugman.html?oref=login&hp By PAUL KRUGMAN (NYT) Op-Ed 779 words Late Edition - Final , Section A , Page 23 , Column 1 ABSTRACT - Paul Krugman Op-Ed column says Pres Bush's claim that Social Security must be privatized to avert imminent crisis has fallen flat, so now he is playing race card; says he told African-American group that system is inherently unfair to blacks because they do not live long enough to collect their fair share of benefits; says Bush's use of that false argument is doubly shameful, because he is exploiting tragedy of high black mortality for political gain instead of treating it as problem to be solved; notes Social Security Administration's chief actuary has said that nonwhite population actually enjoys same or better expected rates of return from Social Security as whites Please Note: Archive articles do not include photos, charts or graphics. To read the complete article, simply click on one of the BUY NOW buttons below. You can buy this single article or, for even greater value, you can purchase this article as part of a multi-pack. You'll then have the opportunity to buy additional articles now or in the future at significant savings! Article Archive: 1996-Present multi-packs are not valid for use with Article Archive: 1851-1995 multi-packs and vice versa. How multi-packs work: A multi-pack is an archive package that saves you money by allowing you to pre-purchase a set number of articles in bulk at a reduced price. You can then debit from your multi-pack and quickly access articles from the archive at your convenience over the lifetime of the multi-pack. Please Note: Article Archive 1996-Present multi-packs are not valid for use with Article Archive: 1851-1995 multi-packs and vice versa. Once you purchase an article, you may view it as often as you like over the next 90 days. |