1/6 WTF, you can't defend a child hit with a water bottle at a football
game now? The sailor guy is lucky the kid's friends didn't have
guns!
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2005/01/06/state1916EST0140.DTL
\_ I think you're confusing "defense" with "revenge"
\_ You must be some kind of liberal. You'd sit by and do nothing
while some clown is throwing things at a kid you're with??
\_ The guy throws an empty water bottle. You and two of your
friends beat him unconscious. Does that seem like a valid
response to you. And yes, I am a liberal. The guy was an
ass for not apologizing if he hit the kid on purpose. But,
funny thing, I have some modicum of self control, and I
would hope others do too.
\_ You must be some kind of idiot. Almost killing a guy because
he threw an empty bottle at a kid is never justified.
Not only are these three morons going to get a year in the
pen, they're going to be slapped with a huge assault and
battery tort lawsuit by the sailor. I mean, are you going
to go and slash someone's throat because he took your
parking space? If you think this behavior is justified,
I think you need to go seek professional help.
\_ The article said the sailor refused to apologize. If that's
the whole story, I think he's a dick and deserve to get
beaten up. However, this being civilized society, I think
the three men went a bit too far. I think the fair thing
would be to charge the sailor for "assault" as well for
hitting the kid with the bottle.
\_ And that they didn't should give a clue that it probably
an accident. |