Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 35147
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/05/25 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/25    

2004/12/1-3 [Academia/UCLA] UID:35147 Activity:moderate
12/1    Here's the complete list of top 200 universities in the world:
        http://www.coe.berkeley.edu/newsroom/2004/rankingsTimes.pdf
        \_ Rankings are lame.  All I want to say is, UCLA _better not_ be
           #26 overall.  That would make me very sad. -- ilyas
           \_ UCLA is a world-class institution in many fields. What's
              your gripe?
              \_ The CS department?  Well, that and the 'soul of UCLA.'
                   -- ilyas
                 \_ What is your gripe with the department? Poor quality
                    research being done?
                    \_ There is some decent research that comes out of UCLA
                       CS ... sometimes, but I think the dept. is sick.
                       I am just comparing to how I remember the Cal CS
                       dept. was.  -- ilyas
                       dept. was.  If you honestly care, send me an
                       email, and I ll ramble more. -- ilyas
        \_ We're #2: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1343642,00.html
        \_ I'm assuming you just got that email from Newton, too?
           \_ Yup.  When I last mentioned the ranking on the motd, I couldn't
              locate the complete list.
        \_ let's see how many people think this is a bogus ranking.
           \_ It depends on how you look at it. It is almost certainly bogus
              for the purposes of choosing a school for studying a particular
              degree in a particular career..
              \_ You are obviously not a Korean (or Chinese) mother.
                 \_ And obviously never served.
                    \_ BUD DAY didn't send HIS kids to Berkeley!
              \_ What if you don't have definite plans for a degree or a
                 career when you're choosing the college to attend?
                 career when you're choosing the college to attend?  Then
                 wouldn't picking the highest ranked (whatever your favorite
                 list may be) college be a reasonable strategy?
                 \_ No way.  Depending on your personality type, your chances
                    of figuring out what you want to do and succeeding at it
                    might be much higher at a small liberal arts college or
                    might be much higher at a huge state school.  There are
                    both of this type of school that are similarly ranked
                    in most rankings, and I think this is a very important
                    choice to make, regardless of what level of ranking
                    school you've gotten into.  For me, a huge state school
                    was exactly the right place to be, but I've definitely
                    seen people get lost in the system at Cal who would probably
                    have done a lot better at some little liberal arts school
                    where they're not just a number.
                 \_ Then at least see the rankings based on your career
                    choice. For example, they have Harvard listed at the
                    top but that doesn't imply that Harvard is the best
                    engineering or say CS school. Just like Caltech and
                    MIT (listed no 4 and 3 respectively) are not the best
                    schools for many social sciences or humanities.
                    \_ Anyone who hasn't settled on a degree yet is not
                       likely to have settled on a career, and in any case I
                       stipulated "... don't have definite plans for a degree
                       or a career...".
                \_ The criteria used for those rankings, makes those
                   rankings even less relevant to undergraduate education.
                   On the other hand, if you're considering going to grad
                   school, then at that point you certainly already know
                   what to study.
                   \_ Agreed.  I implicitely limited the choice to undergrad
                      when I said "choosing the college [vs. grad school] to
                      attend".
2025/05/25 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/25    

You may also be interested in these entries...
2011/8/3-27 [Academia/Berkeley, Academia/UCLA] UID:54155 Activity:nil
8/3     Berkeley now ranks 70, while UCLA ranks 50. Williams College
        is #1.
        http://www.forbes.com/top-colleges/list
        \_ Forbes hates public education. A less ideologically biased ranking
           has Berkeley at 22 (which is still a fall from the golden years):
           http://tinyurl.com/4476z5m (US News and World Report)
	...
2011/3/14-4/20 [Academia/UCLA] UID:54059 Activity:nil
3/14    UCLA girls are HOT HOT HOT:
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lg3tIERI-D4
        \_ snooze snooze snooze
        \_ ASU || UNC >>> UCLA
        \_ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOGpGoEMu2s
           this has got to be the funniest sh***
	...
2010/2/4-3/4 [Academia/UCLA, Academia/StanfUrd] UID:53690 Activity:nil
2/4     UCB 19th in private donations for 2009 behind #1 Stanford and #9 UCLA.
        http://tinyurl.com/yjojbhe (LA Times)
        List of Top 20: http://tinyurl.com/y8n3nye (Wall Street Journal)
        \_ advice to UCB fundraiser committee: Ask not how you can
           get more donations. Ask why you are not getting donations.
        \_ why the fuck should i donate to a place that told me my undergrad
	...
2010/1/7-19 [Academia/UCLA] UID:53615 Activity:nil
1/6     http://tinyurl.com/top100schools
        UCLA is ranked above Berkeley. UCSD is ranked above
        Berkeley. Irvine is ranked one below Berkeley.
        Berkeley has seriously gone done in the past
        two decades. I'm not surprised.
        \_ These aren't "best schools" these are "best value" rankings.
	...
2009/9/26-10/8 [Academia/UCLA] UID:53404 Activity:kinda low
9/26    Cal vs. Oregon:  Were you surprised? </sarcasm>
        \_ I was not surprised the Oregon scored 42 points. I was surprised
        \_ I was not surprised that Oregon scored 42 points. I was surprised
           that Cal only scored 3.
        \_ Not surprised they lost. Surprised at what a thorough ass-kicking it
           was on both sides of the ball. Cal couldn't even put up a TD.
	...
2009/9/23-10/5 [Academia/GradSchool] UID:53395 Activity:moderate
9/23    I'm in grad school part time, and the professor I was trying to get
        to advise me just sent me "What you suggest (remote, part-time, topic
        formulation) doesn't fit my advising style..."  Does anyone know
        what "topic formulation" might mean in this context?  I come with
        funding from work, but the topics I can choose are somewhat limited.
        Could be a reference to that...
	...
2009/2/8-15 [Academia/OtherSchools, Academia/UCLA] UID:52534 Activity:moderate
2/8     Why does UC suck so hard? I did undergrad at UCB and I hated it.
        Professors couldn't teach, class workload was high, and the system
        was designed to "weed out" students and demoralize them rather
        than teach and encourage them. I always got lower grades than I
        deserved for the amount of work I put in. I don't know if this was
        because of the curve which insists that 50% of students should get
	...
Cache (3569 bytes)
www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1343642,00.html
The Times and The Sunday Times electronic paper The Times and The Sunday Times electronic paper Britain November 04, 2004 Britain wins eight places in world list of 50 best universities By Tony Halpin OXFORD and Cambridge are among the world's top ten universities, accordin g to a new global ranking published today. They were fifth and sixth respectively in the league table of the world's 200 best universities. American institutions occupied seven of the top ten places, with Oxbridge the highest-ranked outside the United States. London's position as a centre of global educational significance was conf irmed with four institutions in the top 50. The London School of Economi cs was 11th, Imperial College 14th, University College London 34th, and the School of Oriental and African Studies 44th. The only European university outside Britain in the top 20 was the Federa l Institute of Technology in Zurich, Switzerland, in tenth place. Cambridge, Massachusetts, however, can lay claim to being the world's mos t intellectual city, as home to Harvard and to the Massachusetts Institu te of Technology, which was ranked at No3. California also scored highly, with the University of California, Berkele y, in second place, the California Institute of Technology, fourth, and Stanford seventh. Tokyo University, in Japan, ranked at No12, was the highest-ranked instit ution in Asia, followed by Beijing University at No17. Six were among the to p 50 in the World University Rankings, led by the Australian National Un iversity in sixteenth place. France, by contrast, managed just two universities in the top 50, with th e cole Polytechnique in 27th place and cole Normale Suprieure 30th. H eidelburg University, in 47th place, was Germany's only entry, one fewer than Hong Kong. Britain was home to 18 of Europe's top 50 universities, and six of the to p ten, but not a single institution from Spain, Portugal, Italy or Greec e made the list. The United States had 62 of the top 200 universities, f ollowed by Britain with 30, Germany 17 and Australia 14. Twenty-nine cou ntries were represented in the global rankings overall. Universities were placed in the table with the help of findings from a su rvey for the THES of 1,300 academics in 88 countries. They were asked to name the best institutions in the fields that they felt knowledgeable a bout. The table also included data on the amount of cited research produced by faculty members as an indicator of intellectual vitality, the ratio of f aculty to student numbers and a university's success in attracting forei gn students and internationally renowned academics in the global market for education. The five factors were weighted and transformed against a scale that gave the top university 1,000 points and ranked everyone else as a proportion of that score. By taking acc ount of the views of academics from across five continents and using the most up-to-date statistics, our ranking gives an informed picture of th e world's top universities." A world league of the best 500 research universities, published in Septem ber by academics at Shanghai Jiao Tong University in China, placed Cambr idge third behind Harvard and Stanford. Oxford came eighth, while Britis h universities ranked second overall behind those in the United States. Last December a report by Richard Lambert, former Editor of the Financial Times, urged the Russell Group of Britain's leading 19 universities to establish a league table of the world's best research institutions, by w hich they could measure their own performances.