| WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ | |
 http://csua.com/feed/ | |
| ||||||
| 5/18 |
| 2004/11/10 [Politics/Domestic/Crime] UID:34808 Activity:very high 57%like:30533 |
11/11 I get the feeling the Peterson's trial is going to be like OJ Simpson
all over again. If you are rich [1], you can get away with anything.
\_ 3 things unique about the OJ case. 1. Johnny Cockroach and his
lame glove/chubaka defense. 2. Uneducated minority jury who
have sympathy for people of their own kind. 3. Uneducated
jury who believe the glove/chubaka defense.
\_ What the fuck are you guys talking about? I saw something
about this case on http://www.cnn.com but they didn't explain the context
at all either. What the fuck is the matter with this country
that every news story involving, say, the secretary of defense
of the U.S. tells you who everyone is in case you don't know, but
for some stupid fucking celebrity trial tabloid bullshit, it's
assumed everyone knows?
\_ Peterson is a shit salesman. You are a knucklehead. His parents
took out a loan on their house to pay his lawyers.
\_ Why? He's fucking guilty.
\_ why? cuz he uses a trout pole for ocean fishing?
go to a pier and see what twinks fish with these
days
\_ Not because of what he used, but because of what he
didn't use. He told police that he bought some fake bait
and used it for fishing, but when the police found the
bait it was still in its packaging.
\_ Because they love their son and will believe anything he tells
them as long as it preserves their image of him as a good boy.
\_ No. The prosecutors presented a weak case. Also the police
did a poor job of detective work.
\_ With OJ, you had damning DNA evidence. The jury believed the
defense showed reasonable doubt with a racist detective who might
have planted the DNA evidence.
With Peterson, there is no damning DNA evidence.
\_ The OJ defence of a racist cop trying to frame him is a lot more
compelling, if improbable, than the Peterson defence that the
police did not look hard enough for the 'real killer'.
\_ [1] Scott Peterson was a fertilizer salesman, I must be in the wrong
business. |
| 5/18 |
|
| www.cnn.com EDT (09:38 GMT) May 2, 2004 32 Saudis: Gunmen worked at oil compound 33 Saudis: Gunmen worked at oil compound An explosive belt left by one of the attackers. The Saudi Interior Ministry says three of the four gunmen, who opened fire at a petrochemical compound, actually worked at the site. Saudi authorities also believe all four gunmen were on a list of 26 wanted militants released last year. Six people -- two Americans, two Britons, an Australian and a Saudi policeman -- died in the shooting. ET) CNNs Jeff Koinange returns to Rwanda 10 years after the horrific genocide that shocked the world. Underrated 105 Business News: 106 16,000 at Buffett meeting 107 Death of the supermarket? TIME 100 REPORT 108 More reports 109 Making a difference 110 Making a difference The world's influential people in business, art, politics, science HEAD-TO-TOE FLOW 111 Health News 112 Heart and Blood Health Library: 113 Heart and Blood Tips to lower blood pressure and have a healthy heart OFFBEAT IMAGES 114 The week in pictures 115 The week in pictures Dentally aware dog, flying pigs, hot tub baptism and more WEATHER Get your hometown weather on the home page! Zip Code: PERSONALIZE Or 116 select location from a list Quick Vote Do you work more hours than your parents did? Yes No 117 VIEW RESULTS VOTE From our Partners External site icon 118 Time: 119 Ashcroft's Barriers to Fighting Terror 120 A Solution at Fallujah? |