10/21 http://bitflood.org:8080/?file=791b2f5d95a54d1381b85f271b51f71e73964185
Get the 96MB video for a high-quality clip of the Crossfire Jon
Stewart interview. This is required viewing, especially if you want
to stop watching cable TV political analysis shows.
(For the newbs: Save the .torrent file, then open it in BitTorrent)
\_ What is up with this? Stewart was an ass and the other guy was
no better. BTW, Stewart's own ratings have plunged since then.
\_ Stewart was hilarious, but he had a point: without being partisan
on the matter, he pointed out that CNN puts entertainment value
before relevance in its programming decisions. He's right in
saying that Crossfire is poor parody of a debate show, but I don't
think a real debate show would do well on CNN- the ones on PBS
don't seem to attract viewers.
\_ If you ask me, Stewart was also talking about the problem
of Begala coming "from the left" and Tucker "from the right",
and there not being an honest attempt to reach a correct
answer (regardless of political leanings), implying that
there is none or one is not considered important. By doing
this, you entertain liberals and conservatives and help them
think the other side is full of idiots (encouraging the
polarization of America), but you don't help them come to a
correct, intelligent answer.
E.g., part of the correct answer is if Tucker would say
Dubya is a fucking moron to still say he would have invaded
Iraq if he had known everything we know today.
\_ are you sure? or are you believing drudgereport
again? the daily show has been on a total of one time
since friday's crossfire segment - danh
\_ What have they been doing for the last week?
\_ the crossfire segment everyone keeps talking about was
last friday. the daily show just ran reruns all last
week. i hope matt drudge gets eye syphilis. - danh
\_ So, what you're saying is that Drudge's ratings info
is based on last week, _before_ the Crossfire interview
and during a week of re-runs. Gotcha. 'Cos this week
has been awesome.
\_ right. do you hate drudge as much as i do
yet? - danh
\_ DRUDGE HAS NEVER GOTTEN ANYTHING WRONG!!!!!1
--motd
\_ What? You prefer Dan Rather and CBS for their
highly accurate and well researched and unbiased
reporting?
\_ In the dictionary under "straw man" it says,
"see this post."
\_ Huh? Are you sure you don't mean
"false dichotomy" or maybe "red
herring?"
\_ No, you're looking for "false, but
accurate"!
\_ I'm not sure that's possible, but I get your point. |