8/31 Ignoring what Moore says, the contemporary example for
unequal pay for the same work between men and women is Wal-Mart.
http://www.walmartversuswomen.com/faq.html
"Sworn declarations [in the class-action lawsuit]... among them:
... Managers repeatedly informed women employees that men 'need to be
paid more than women because they have families to support.'
... because 'men are here to make a career and women aren't. Retail is
for housewives who just need to earn extra money.'"
(Moore just ties the behavior of Wal-Mart to the GOP, a link which he
doesn't adequately support.)
\_ The link is obvious. They are the party pushing for deregulation,
gutting the SEC's audit team, trying to gut Tort law, etc etc etc.
The dems push equal pay policy quietly, but at least it's on their
radar.
\_ I don't know: you make some good points on GOP favoring corporate
profits over regulation, but you still haven't persuaded me. -op
\_ This wouldn't even really be about profits. This is about
stripping away regulations and litigative powers. These are
the only tools the people, through the government, hold to
keep corporations in check. The GOP want them gone.
The equal pay for equal work people think the issue should be
on the same level of concern as environmental pollution. The
GOP would love to see both concerns vanish.
\_ There's lies, damn lies, and statistics:
The New York Times reported on Feb. 16, 2003 that a study
commissioned by the plaintiffs. lawyers and released that month by
Richard Drogin, emeritus statistics professor at California State
University, Hayward, "found that full-time women hourly employees
working at least 45 weeks at Wal-Mart made abut $1,150 less per year
than men in similar jobs, a 6.2% gap. Women store managers, he
found, made an average of $89,280 a year, $16,400 less than men."
No mention of methodology. I'm always suspicious of these kind of
studies because they often do not look for other correlations that
might explain the data.
\_ It has enough merit to stand up in court.
\_ Which means squat about its methodological correctness.
\_ and of course you have statistics which show that women
are paid fairly at walmart... |