|
5/24 |
2004/8/27 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:33180 Activity:high |
8/27 Gymnastics jusges ask Paul Hamm to clean up their own mess for them. USOC tells them to shove it. http://tinyurl.com/6omhj \_ Can anybody explain the error the judges made? \_ "The 0.100 points deducted from Yang's start value in parallel bars-- the difficulty of the routine-- was the difference between third and first. Without the mistake, Yang would have won gold, Hamm silver and Kim bronze." In other words, the judges mistakenly thought that Yang's routine on the parallel bars was in less difficult points category and docked his starting score to reflect that. This is a kind of handicapping system that encourages gymnasts to try harder routines in exchange for more possible points. \_ Exactly. Hamm has offered to give up the medal if they fix their mistake and award the Gold officially to Yang. They say he should save them the embarrasment and just hand it over himself unofficially. \_ Can you provide a URL where he says that? His line officially now is he won't give it back unless ordered. \_ That means the same thing. When the conterversy first occured, Hamm said he would return the medal if ordered to. ie, He's willing to return the medal, but the FIG must fix their mistake, not rely on the good will of the players. \_ I think in this case Hamm does the right thing. "If you guys insist that my official score is higher than Yang's, why are you asking me to give the gold medal to Yang!!??" But Hamm should make it very clear that his intent is to force them to fix the score, rather than to keep the gold medal to himself. guys insist that Yang's score is lower than mine, why are you asking me to give the gold medal to Yang!!??" But Hamm should make it very clear that his intent is to force them to fix Yang's score, rather than to keep the gold medal to himself. He can even team up with Yang to achieve this, like having a joint press conference. \_ I should point out as a side note that this is particularly irksome to the Koreas because they always fall just short of gold in gymnastics (Or at least, so says my wife) So to get screwed out of a gold like this is really pissing off some Koreans. As a side note, I haven't heard this, but I'm willign to bet theres a lot of "Those cheating americans!" type yelling in Korea. -jrleek \_ Were any of the judges American? It sounds like the only thing he did 'wrong' was refuse to take responsibility for someone else's mistake. \_ I don't know where the judges were from. That's kind of the default cry for some people for anything America is involved in where Korea didn't win. Hamm, hence, the problem must be America's fault. QED. \_ My understanding was they *also* screwed up on the Korean because he made an illegal hold and should have lost *more* points. My opinion is that Hamm should send the medal back to the committee and tell them he doesn't want his name to be sullied by association with olympic judging. \_ If the gymanstics jusges were American, they are OBVIOUSLY Kerry supporters. Flip-flop, flip-flop!1$! You can't have it both ways! \_ or Bush administration - find someone to take responsibilities of their own mistakes. |
5/24 |
|
tinyurl.com/6omhj -> story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=755&e=1&u=/ap/20040827/ap_on_sp_ol/oly_tainted_gold web sites) to give up his gold medal as the ultimate show of sportsmanship, but the US Olympic Committee told them to take responsibility for their own mistakes and refused even to deliver the request. web sites)'s Yang Tae-young "would be recognized as the ultimate demonstration of fair play by the whole world." FIG president Bruno Grandi tried to send the letter Thursday night to Hamm through the USOC, which declined to pass it along. In a letter back to Grandi, USOC secretary general Jim Scherr called the request "a blatant and inappropriate attempt on the part of (FIG) to once again shift responsibility for its own mistakes and instead pressure Mr Hamm into resolving what has become an embarrassing situation for your federation." "The USOC finds this request to be improper, outrageous and so far beyond the bounds of what is acceptable that it refuses to transmit the letter to Mr Hamm," the letter said. He declined comment Friday through his agent, but he has said in the past that he has no intention of giving up his medal unless ordered to do so by FIG. Yang, the bronze medalist, was wrongly docked a tenth of a point on his parallel bars routine and finished third, 0049 points behind Hamm. Add the extra 0100, and Yang would have finished 0051 points ahead of Hamm. Three judges were suspended after the error was discovered, but FIG said the results would stand. Grandi said he believed the issue was closed until he learned of Hamm's previous comment. "For me, maybe he could have said, I have won the gold medal and the FIG just has to tell me whether it maintains the results or not,'" Grandi said. "And not make a statement whether he would return the gold medal if we asked him to." Although Grandi's letter says, "The true winner of the all-around competition is Yang Tae-young," the FIG president insisted he's not pressuring Hamm. I respect totally Paul Hamm and all the decisions he makes. "I don't know of any comparison in any sport anywhere where you crown an athlete, crown a team and then say, Oh, that was a mistake. Ueberroth said the USOC considers the case closed, based on the FIG ruling that the scores cannot be changed. web sites) would stick with the results turned in by the federation and wouldn't step in unless there were clear signs of impropriety. "We are not going to give medals for so-called humanitarian or emotional reasons," Rogge said. Above the "Dear Paul" greeting on Grandi's letter, the word "FAIRPLAY" was capitalized and printed in bold, black letters. "The FIG and the IOC would highly appreciate the magnitude of this gesture," the letter said. Earlier in the week, the USOC said it was willing to consider supporting the South Koreans' bid for a second gold medal. Scherr said that was no longer possible because of FIG's latest request. He said he regretted not coming out in support of Hamm as soon as the controversy began. "I think we were at fault for not more strongly, more directly, showing our support for Paul," Scherr said. "I wish we would have done that more strongly and earlier." The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. |