7/30 So apple is unhappy about RealNetwork's move to have its music
play on the iPod, this sounds like, Sony is unhappy because
their Discman plays CDs from other labels!! Does this sounds
stupid or do they have real control over what can be played on
the ipod?
\_ you can put mp3's on it w/o complaints from apple, but they dont
want you hacking their drm.
\_ I can see not wanting people to hack their DRM to take the DRM
off of songs you bought at the iTunes store, but Real made it
so you can put songs *into* their DRM system. To continue the
Sony analogy, it would be like other movie studios helping you
convert your VHS tapes to play on a Beta VCR.
\_ All which will help the sales of the BetaVCR, so I don't see
what the big deal is. Just when I start to like Apple, they
try to patent GUI again. :)
\_ The problem is the iPod is the top-dog of mp3 players, so
by making it only work with ITMS they can prop-up the
barely-profitable, highly competitive online music sales
part of the company with the highly-profitable, market
dominating music player. If the iPod plays songs from any
store, it'll sell more iPods, but it just became a lot
easier for any other music store to beat ITMS.
\_ But Apple has admitted that iTunes is a loss leader
designed to sell iPods.
\_ ITMS is actually slightly profitable now. I can
see why Apple wants to own the dominant music store
and not let say, Microsoft own the market. When the
online music market has a shakeout, and it will, the
dominant company will be in a better position to
negotiate with record companies. At that point I can
see Apple flexing their muscle a bit.
If Apple has determined that the iPod not supporting
other stores does minimal damage to iPod sales, then
why would you want a slight boost to one product at
the expense of massive losses in another?
\_ They might not like it, but by threatening legal
action they look like assholes, and at least in
the right world, would lose.
\_ two cases: m$ and sco. the former uses this
method and often wins (the battle if not the
trial) while the latter seems to be loosing
with this tactic. it will be interesting to
see how various courts rule on this (if it
gets that far.
\_ You are loosing a battle too. A battle with
spelling.
\_ i fight battles worth fighting. for this
one i accepted a truce - i spell check
when need be.
\_ On a separate note, my iPod does not play some mp3 files without
any explanation, I am suspecting it having something to do with the
mp3 being DRMd. Is there any freeware/software that removes those
stuff and make it to be a plain mp3 file? thx.
\_ Test if a plain-old mp3-player proram can play them, eg. XMMS or
Winamp. If they can, it's a iPod problem, if they can't you're
Winamp. If they can, it's an iPod problem, if they can't you're
going to have to find out what kind of DRM they're wrapped in.
\_ Yes, winamp can play it, so does WMP. So I guess it's an ipod
problem, damn it.
\_ There's a slight possibility Winamp is detecting the DRM
passing it through to some WMP DRM library. Can you try to
play it in some minimalist player program?
\_ Eh? MP3s don't have DRM, unless you're using mp3pro or some
other variant. Maybe the iPod just doesn't like the bitrate or
sampling rate of those files.
\_ He seems to think he might have some DRM'd file named as MP3.
FWIW I've seen un-DRMed AAC named MP3, but Winamp freaked out. |