| ||||||
| 5/24 |
| 2004/6/30-7/1 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China] UID:31103 Activity:high |
6/30 "Voters are being pressured by employers and others to back
pro-Beijing candidates and encouraged to photograph marked ballots
with cell phone cameras to prove their patriotism."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A16223-2004Jun29.html
\_ Sounds like a good market for faked photographs.
\_ Well, now that we're wriggling out of Iraq, maybe we can make
strong staments against China again.
\_ Exactly. How else can BushCo fuck the tax payer's money to make
them rich? China is the perfect 'enemy' after Iraq. Do we all
remember the spy plane incident? Yeah, they have us believe
China would nuke us any minute back then. Fuck BushCo, piece
of shit.
\_ I'm not a big fan of the rambling haters on the motd
either, but I don't think it is fair to impersonate/
charicature them like this, as perhaps (though it seems
unlikeley) someone will think it is an earnest post.
\_ Who's he impersonating, Lupo the Butcher?
\_ So what?
\_ You are in a maze of ignorance, surrounded by twisty passages,
all alike. I wish you would be eaten by a Grue.
\_ Stop criticizing China and spend your time on more
productive things, like vote Bush down and make sure
this country is not as fucked up as it is now. Geez.
What's next? Bush will send our spy planes to fly
REAL close to China and to provoke them to distract
us from his incompetence? Yeah, China is the biggest
threat to peace on this planet next to Iraq huh?
\_ The Washington Post is criticizing China.
The Post is also criticizing Bush policy.
Why not do both?
\_ I am just so fed up seeing all the anti-China
posts. BushCo stirs it up for its own evil
reason and the media buys it. Everything you
see in the media about China is negative. All
because of what? Because BushCo wants a public
enemy so they can dump the taxpayer's money
onto the defense companies and make them rich.
The problem with defense companies is they
don't go together peace and prosperity. BushCo
will get rich when the world is at war, and it
is what we are now. Wake up people, there are
bigger things to worry about than China trying
to convince its voters to vote for pro-beijing
leaders to keep their country intact.
\_ "convince" its voters
\_ Of course. China does not have laws that
legalize corruption. Political
contribution IS corruption legalized. In
China, some gets their head chopped off
for taking money, in the US, it's all
OK. Candidates openly ask for money, and
Bush surely made anyone contributed to
his campaign filthy rich, all legalized
and taken for granted. Perhaps there's a
lot China can learn from the US....
\_ Why is there a protest of 200K+ Hong Kongers
today? http://csua.org/u/80h
\_ Because HK people have been
brainwashed for centuries by the
Brits. They'd rather lick the feet
of a Brit than stand up and be a
man themselves. If your country is
occupied by someone else for so
long, you'll know. Just look at
Taiwan, they still 'look up' to
Japan, even though Japan invaded
them and treated them like 2nd
class citizen. Same thing with HK.
HK people are gutless because they
never ruled themselves. Having a
Brits at the top makes them feel
more secure, because that's the
way they are brought up to believe
in. Anything mainland China say
must be wrong.
\_ This is such an awful troll. Most
HK people have only been there since
the 50's or 60's. If you think Beijing
knows what's best for HK then I don't
know what to tell you.
-jeffwong
\_ I'm sorry, did you miss the Cultural
Revolution, the Gang of Four, and
Tianamen Square? PRC elites treat their
own people like 2nd class citizens.
Sure, bribery is punishable by death,
but you're much more likely to be
charged if you don't belong the Party
and toe the party line. It's not a
People's Paradise; it's an old-fashioned
oligarchy, and it needs to be squished.
\_ Every attempt to squish an oligarchy
results in a new and much worse
obligarchy. Communism is an example.
\_ uh oh ... I don't like BushCo's
fear-mongering with regard to
China, but I like Hong Kong
people's resistance to China's
attempts to silence dissent.
I don't see any contradiction
with holding both views. Attempts
to link the two is mostly unwarranted. |
| 5/24 |
|
| www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A16223-2004Jun29.html Editorials Editorial Unhappy Anniversary Wednesday, June 30, 2004; Page A20 SEVEN YEARS AGO tomorrow Hong Kong returned to Chinese rule with both fanfare and fear. The freewheeling city-state had evolved during its decades as a British colony into an exemplar of capitalism and the rule of law, and optimists hoped that some of its magic might rub off on Communist China. The pessimistic view was that influence would flow the other way, with China's corruption and one-party authoritarianism gradually eroding Hong Kong's freedoms. Lately Beijing has been turning the pessimists' view into reality, to disturbingly little complaint from the United States and other democracies. The most visible blow came when Beijing rejected any possibility of popular elections for Hong Kong's chief executive in 2007 and for all legislators in 2008. But also damaging are the continuing manipulations by Beijing of Hong Kong politics and media. This year Chinese officials labeled pro-democracy leaders "unpatriotic," setting a tone for the harassment and intimidation that duly followed. Already, three outspoken radio talk-show hosts have quit after receiving what they alleged were threats from people with ties to the Chinese government. A pro-democracy lawmaker's office, previously vandalized with excrement, was set on fire overnight last week with a threat scribbled on the wall: "All Chinese traitors must die." Much of the intimidation is related to September elections. Hong Kong operates under a system that allows voters to choose half of its legislators, while others are selected by professional associations more easily manipulated by Beijing. But even that degree of control is not sufficient for mainland China. Voters are being pressured by employers and others to back pro-Beijing candidates and encouraged to photograph marked ballots with cell phone cameras to prove their patriotism. Provoking fears of even more blatant interference, two Chinese public security agents were found operating in Hong Kong, while mainland authorities refuse to say what they were doing there. Beijing officials seek to balance their bad-cop tactics with a good-cop strategy of boosting the territory's economy with aid. But Hong Kong is not, as sometimes caricatured, a city of businessmen who don't care about politics. That much has been shown in the democrats' big win in local district elections in November, along with rising voter registration levels in advance of September's election. Hundreds of thousands are expected to demonstrate tomorrow in favor of democratization. That such protests are permitted shows that Hong Kong remains freer in many ways than the rest of China. But if voter intimidation and ballot rigging mar September's election, it will lead to serious questions about the extent of Hong Kong's autonomy. |
| csua.org/u/80h -> story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/040701/photos_wl_afp/040701194358_tjs5rq6d_photo1 Mideast Conflict Slideshow Palestinian relatives and friends of nine-year-old Omar Mohammed Abu Zreihan, mourn during ... The information contained in the AFP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Agence France Presse. |