| WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ | |
 http://csua.com/feed/ | |
| ||||||
| 11/23 |
| 2004/6/30 [Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton, ERROR, uid:31084, category id '18005#21.245' has no name! , ] UID:31084 Activity:high |
6/30 http://www.drudgereport.com/kerryhrc.htm Anonymous insider claims that Hillary is going to be Kerry's VP pick. \_ Where's that hilarious motd troll who claimed that Drudge was never wrong? He needs to be properly mocked again. \_ No. Drudge was wrong once which he got sued for. The rest of his stuff is either links to other sites or like this URL make it clear he is quoting a single anonymous source. He leaves it for the reader to decide. Try again. \_ So you see absolutely nothing wrong with publicizing false accusations from single anonymous sources? Wow, you are really amoral. \_ Now you're confusing morals with the accuracy of his publication. I see no difference between this URL and the same anonymous sources getting quoted all the time in the newspapers. Do you? \_ For one, the anonymous source says nothing definitive so the whole quote is meaningless. But in fact, I see no difference on the whole. Reporting single anonymous sources without any effort to confirm their allegations, as Drudge routinely does, is amoral. If I have a very popular publication and I get a phone call in the middle of the night telling me that Dick Cheney rapes dogs, I have a responsibility to try and confirm that before I print it. Are you familiar with the concept of libel? And yes, I know US libel law requires malicious intent. \_ Bush it is! \_ The best part about this non-credible non-story is that there is no definite gotcha in the quotes - the "insider" is speculating just as much as Drudge is, reporting Capitol hill gossip and giving his opinion of what it means. It doesn't even qualify as decent hearsay Why do people pay attention to Drudge again? \_ It's hearsay about speculation about hearsay. That's a *kind* of evidence. -Lionel Hutz \_ Wrong! "Well, Your Honor. We've plenty of hearsay and conjecture. Those are *kinds* of evidence." |
| 11/23 |
|
| www.drudgereport.com/kerryhrc.htm XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX WED JUNE 30, 2004 11:18:25 ET XXXXX VICE PRESIDENT HILLARY; SPECULATION INTENSIFIES IN WASHINGTON Official Washington and the entire press corps will be rocked when Hillary Rodham Clinton is picked as Kerry's VP and a massive love fest will begin! So predicts a top Washington insider, who spoke to the DRUDGE REPORT on condition he not be named. "All the signs point in her direction," said the insider, one of the most influential and well-placed in the nation's capital. MORE "There are three issues that this campaign will be decided on -- national security, health care, and the economy, not necessarily in that order." "Kerry believes that no one is better on national security than he is, he served in Vietnam after all, so he has that covered and the suggestion that he needs to strengthen the ticket with someone who has national security credentials is dismissed as foolish." The insider continues: "The Democrats feel like health care is the domestic issue. But how to make it the dominant topic of conversation -- break through war and terrorism? She tried to provide health care before and the Republicans in congress attacked her and her husband and used a bunch of scandals dirty tricks to stop it, we know they are scandals and dirty tricks because the former president book says so. So now you have the number two person on the ticket who is a 'health care expert' and what will Republicans do? Attack on health care pointing to her commission saying that it was government medicine. Her response -- it wasn't, and the Republicans are a bunch of dirty tricksters, "Liars and Crooks," as Kerry calls them, and its been too long and Democrats wont let the Republicans do it to them again. By the way, it puts prescription drugs on the back burner, the Republicans health care ace. You will have a fully engaged national debate on health care from now until the election." MORE "The Democrats economic plan is to say Bush sucks, it's never enough, we must get back to the Clinton Era when 22 million jobs were created. You can't do much better at making that point then-- Kerry/Clinton 2004. "But what about impeachment and Monica -- wont that overshadow her being picked? Not only that, but she is a women scorned who has dealt with what so many American women deal with and stuck it out to keep her family together. "Why would Kerry make such a public spectacle about trying to get John Mccain, wont whoever you pick be considered a second choice. "There are differences of opinion about how this election will be won but one school says its all about the base. Republicans are bumping up against the ceiling with support from their base and Democrats are sitting on the floor. "Official Washington and national media will fall in love with the idea immediately letting Kerry/Clinton dominate the news through July and up to the Republican convention. She will say she is doing it for the good of the country. MORE "But what Hillary about having to wait to run for president? If Bush wins then she is the nominee for 2008 because it will be all Kerry's fault. If she wins she is the first woman VP of the United States, which would help her become the first woman president of the US It would be historic in its own right and change the nature of politics in this country, and mark her place in the history books for ever-- a different history than her husbands." |