6/28 What's a better 3D WW2 shooter game, Battlefield 1942, Call of Duty,
or something else?
\_ Medal of Honor. Very cool, very difficult D-Day Landing. Well,
then it kinda gets repetitive, but there you go. BF1942 is best
played multiplayer with lots of people, preferably not twinks.
\_ Seconded. I really enjoy 1942 (loads of variety, not too
twitchy) multiplayer, ith some clued people. I understand
that for single-player, CoD is brilliant though. -John
\_ Thirded. BF42 is pretty awesome with good teams. -eric
\_ Fourthed. BF1942 also has the awesome expansion pack Desert
Combat which is free and revolves around the first Gulf War
(vaguely). There are better vehicles to pilot including
choppers and an AC130 gunship. Also, consider BF:Vietnam
where the terrain and tactics are more interesting.
I say BF1942 has better graphics and gameplay than MoH.
--jeffwong
\_ Does anyone else think that turning genuine human sacrifice
into a game is deeply disturbing?
\_ nope.
\_ Yup. Kids might get ideas, better ban it. -John
\_ That is not what I mean. I don't think that these
games are bad in and of themselves. It just seems
to me that most people I've met treat these just
like any other FPS and do not realize that real
men fought and died at the battles that are
depicted in the game. This I found somewhat
disturbing. I was wondering if anyone else felt
the same way.
\_ They turn it into movies, why not games? By the way
you just jumped from "deeply" to "somewhat" disturbing.
\_ He's already getting used to the violence.
\_ Guess you are right.
\_ You mean like that Aztec ball game?
\_ Don't forget the Call of Duty Russian missions. Those were great. |