6/2 Watch Bush asnwer unrehearsed questions on Iraq.
rtsp://video.c-span.org/archive/iraq/iraq060104_bush1.rm
\_ There was this interview with Bush about the 9/11 commission
where he was interested to see what the commission said about
our intelligence services. In his own words, he said,
"I look forward to seeing the intelligence and the looks."
\_ "I voted for it before I voted against it". You can find stupid
quotes and bad speeches from any politician. It's just easier
to make fun of the other guy's politician and ignore or excuse
the stupidity your own spews out.
\_ I'm amazed that the right has clung on to this. Most people
can understand the distinction between procedural and final
votes.
\_ It wasn't procedural. He proposed an amendment to roll
back tax cuts to cover the $87 billion. The amendment
failed, so he voted against the bill. This was on the
supplemental appropriations bill.
\_ See? That's exactly what I mean. You guy always has an
excuse while the other guy is always an idiot. Thank you
for making my point in response to my point. Perfect.
\_ But what would you do if Bush *really was* an idiot?
\_ Does this really need to be said?
"I look forward to seeing the intelligence and the looks."
== stupidity
"I voted for it before I voted against it"
== maneuvering
If you measure by quality and quantity of quotes, Bush is far
stupider, than Kerry maneuvers.
It is also quite clear that George Bush II is worse than Dan Quayle.
\_ See? That's exactly what I mean. You guy always has an
excuse while the other guy is always an idiot. Thank you
for making my point in response to my point. Perfect.
\_ Don't you get it? Republicans prefer a stupid guy
who will lower taxes, to a maneuvering guy who will
raise taxes.
\_ I do too. -- ilyas
\_ Watch the video - he gives an excellent press conference.
\_ I did. The prepared speech is fine; most people only see
that. The Q&A session showed he has a very hard time
responding to reporter's questions. Unfortunately, most
people don't see Bush's Q&A sessions.
\_ Okay then we see something completely opposite.
\_ I'm guessing you think he isn't the most eloquent
person, but he's honest and direct. Is that accurate?
\_ he recognizes his limitations, has vision, and
is not egomaniac. I think he has wisdom and
conviction, though unrefined. Were he 10-15 years
older I think he could have been as good as
Reagan. Eloquence is superfluous.
\_ I'm guessing what you value in Bush, from highest
to lowest, is:
wisdom, conviction, has vision
> recognizes his limitations, not egomaniac
>> eloquence
Is this accurate?
\_ I suppose ... That said he's too liberal and
has too many establishment ties and the
accompanying corruption. I think Bush I was
a mistake - CIA officials should be prohibited
from other branches of government. Obviously
he is the lesser of evils compared to Kerry,
Gore, and Clinton (or most any dem).
\_ Sigh, I basically completely agree with
this guy. |