| WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ | |
 http://csua.com/feed/ | |
| ||||||
| 5/24 |
| 2004/5/6 [Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton, Politics/Domestic/President] UID:30071 Activity:nil |
5/6 Cover of the new Economist:
http://www.economist.com/images/20040508/20040508issuecovUS400.jpg
\_Damn liberal media
\_ And where were the calls for Reno to step down after she immolated
a few dozen children and women in Waco?
\_ I see. It's her fault they were too nutty to leave the building?
In any case, some people *did* call for her to step down at the
time.
\_ Uh, I don't think you are very familiar with that incident.
-- ilyas
\_ Most of America agrees with him:
http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/printerfriend/index.asp?PID=16
\_ Over 100 people were immolated by the Fed government and
you respond with a fucking poll!!?? The MOTD is
populated with fascist leftists.. I see that now.
\_ Can someone tell me what religions are sacntioned by the Fed
government so I don't have to be worried about immolation?
Thanks!
\_ just try to tone down the incest, pedophilia, and weapons
stockpiling.
\_ Good little fascist. Why don't you scroll through these
autopsy photographs:
http://www.public-action.com/SkyWriter/WacoMuseum/death/map/d_list07.html
\_ All over the place, don't you remember? Republicans in Congress
demanded that she step down.
\_ On the cover of the economist? the washington post? the
nytimes?
\_ latimes ran an opinion piece saying she should step down
over it in 1999.
\_ oooh an opinion piece on page A21. You're position is
completely vindicated!
\_ The story behind the cover is likely that Democrats are
calling for Rumsfeld's resignation. The cover looks like
The Economist is calling for hist resignation, but it's
probably just reporting that others are doing it. Bad
cover IMO. -emarkp
\_ No, I read the article, the economist is calling for
him to resign. This doesn't surprise me, however.
Waco is an internal incident -- Iraq has international
ramifications (well you can argue Waco does too...)
Certainly, I consider both incidents atrocities.
-- ilyas |
| 5/24 |
|
| www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/printerfriend/index.asp?PID=16 Harris Interactive THE HARRIS POLL #55 , September 28, 1999 PUBLIC DIVIDED AND TROUBLED ON WACO Only 43% give Reno positive ratings. A 50% to 43% plurality give Attorney General Janet Reno negative ratings on the job she has done in investigating what happened in Waco. However, a 3-to-1 majority (68% to 22%) do not think she should resign . While a 46% to 27% plurality believe that the Branch Davidians, not the FBI, set the compound on fire, it is bad news for the FBI that this is only a plurality and that more than a quarter of all adults believe they caused the fire. These are some of the results of a nationwide Harris Poll of 1,009 adults surveyed by telephone between September 17 and 21, 1999. Even more troubling for the FBI and the Attorney General, fully 61% of all adults believe that the FBI is at least somewhat to blame for the fire, which destroyed the compound and killed cult members. This includes those who blame them "a lot" (22%) and those who blame them "a little" (39%). While there are only modest differences between Republicans, Democrats and Independents in their belief about who set the fire and how much the FBI were to blame, there are some differences between Conservatives, Liberals and Moderates. Liberals (36%) are more likely than Conservatives (29%) or Moderates (23%) to believe the FBI set the compound on fire. Liberals are also more likely to blame the FBI at least a little (71%) than are Conservatives (62%) or Moderates (57%). When it comes to questions about Janet Reno the replies are much more partisan. Most Republicans (by 59% to 34%) give her negative ratings on Waco; One-third (33%) of Republicans think she should resign because of Waco; S RATING ON WACO "How would you rate the job Attorney General Janet Reno has done in investigating what happened in Waco . Figures for age, sex, race, education, number of adults and number of voice/telephone lines in the household were weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in the population. In theory, with a sample of this size, one can say with 95 percent certainty that the results have a statistical precision of plus or minus 3 percentage points of what they would be if the entire adult population had been polled with complete accuracy. Unfortunately, there are several other possible sources of error in all polls or surveys that are probably more serious than theoretical calculations of sampling error. It is difficult or impossible to quantify the errors that may result from these factors. These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls. |
| www.public-action.com/SkyWriter/WacoMuseum/death/map/d_list07.html Wendel 40 Pathology Comm room 31 C Unidentified (not on ID Matrix) 87 31 DE Unidentified DNA (not on ID Matrix) 88 31 F Unidentified DNA (not on ID Matrix) 89 46 Bone (no DNA sample) kitchen 48 dog dining room 90 51 A Unidentified pantry buried 91 59 Unidentified pantry buried 92 60 child humerus pantry buried 93 65 Unidentified DNA pantry buried 94 67-7 Unidentified (no DNA sample) pantry buried 95 67-8 Unidentified (no DNA sample) pantry buried 68 No body for MC #68 pantry buried Back: 96 Death Gallery Entrance Home: 97 Museum Entrance Search: 98 Museum Text Many people who distrust the mainstream media have turned to alternate news sources, some of which are Internet based. Unfortunately, many of these alternate sources of news simply promote an alternate series of lies. The information in the Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum is an acid test. Does your news source promote Mike McNulty's video, Waco: The Rules of Engagement or wring its hands because the Davidian law suit against the government failed? Published by Public Action, Inc, a news and news analysis service. A full statement of terms and conditions for copying and redistribution is available in the Museum Library. Valentine, PO Box 10933, Burke, VA 22009 This page last updated February 28, 2001. |