8/10 http://m2.doubleclick.net/790463/mrs02112_itdm_wav_336x280_23k.gif
What a funny load of crap. Clearly they haven't heard of FREEbsd.
\_ go ahead and laugh. In the end, technology alone will not
get you cookies. Took me 10 years to realize that
-former linux/bsd/tech fanatic
\_ Did I say it would?
\_ Wait another 10 years. Microsoft will not be a monoploy.
What is the key to cookies, oh enlightened cynical one?
\_ OS2 was a superior technology but it lost. There are many
other factors such as the user base, development base,
marketing, and many many others. Superior technology
alone makes engineers happy and proud but does not make
it a great product.
\_ don't forget many other factors such as ease
of use (for grandmas grandpas), visual appeal,
support, peer pressure, etc etc.
\_ i'd make a comment on this, but i have to go watch a
movie on my betamax now.
\_ Why did OS2 loose? because mircosoft made
things incompatible. I believe free software
will overcome all non-technical obstacles
because it is free and developers and users
like it. Companies like IBM and Oracle are
doing the advertising for Linux. And most tech
companies hate Microsoft. Was OS2 free?
\_ If Sony had only licensed it to Porn companies,
then Beta would have succeeded. Alas, since VHS
sucks so much, it made DVD more appealing.
\_ VHS won because it was better in ways that people
cared about. Why would you want to use a format
that wouldn't let you record a two-hour movie?
\_ Why did OS2 loose? I believe free software will
overcome all non-technical obstacles because it is
free and developers and users like it. Companies
like IBM and Oracle are doing the advertising for
Linux. And most tech companies hate Microsoft. Was
OS2 free?
\_ many reasons, not the least of which was it needed
several more megs worth of memory to run at any
decent speed and at the time that was 100s of
dollars worth of computer equipment. Plus it
was UGLY in a way that made windows look pretty.
\_ Sounds like OS2 was not "superior". |