Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 29171
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/05/25 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/25    

2003/7/29-30 [Computer/SW/Languages/C_Cplusplus] UID:29171 Activity:high
7/29    I want to zero-initialize an array of somewhat large structs.
        What's the best, most portable way to do so?  C++, embedded
        systems, stack-based array. TIA.
        \_ memset()?
        \_ the best way is probably to have a brace initializer
           that initializes the first struct explicitly (to all 0's).
           the rest of them will then be default initialized (to all 0's).
           this is also most portable because it will take into account
           weird systems, where e.g., the null pointer is not
           internally represented by all-bits-zero. -jl
           \_ do you mean MyStruct array[100] = { }; or
              MyStruct array[100]; array[0] = { }; ?
              \_ the former, though I meant you should have something
                 in between the braces to initialize the first element.
                 actually, gcc seems to accept just the braces, but
                 looking at the grammar, this appears not to be legal.
                 someone feel free to clarify this point. also note that
                 your latter option is assignment, not initialization. -jl
                 \_ It's legal as written -- an empty initializer list is
                    explicitly allowed.  --mconst
                    \_ reference? section 6.5.7 of the c standard doesn't
                        appear to mention any such thing, nor does the
                        grammar.
                        \_ The original poster asked about C++; the C++
                           standard allows it (8.5, paragraph 1).  It's
                           not allowed in C.  --mconst
                        \_ C++
                          \_ not portable
                             \_ Yes, portable.
        \_ do you mean all-bits-zero or each field in each struct assigned
           to zero?  If the former, why not use memset?
           \_ Sorry, I'm not that great at this-- is there a difference
              b/w all bits zero and all fields zero?  I really just want
              to initialize it to something "non-garbage" to distinguish
              between a struct that's been written to and one that has not
              been.  Thanks
              \_ Yes.  null pointers are not necessarily all-bits-zero.
                 floating point numbers have two representations for the
                 value 0 (although one of them is all-bits-zero).
              \_ they are the same in c++. 0 is guaranteed to convert to
                 the null pointer [conv.ptr].
                 \_ To be pedantic, any constant integer expression which
                    evaluates to 0 is guaranteed to convert to the null pointer
                    (say, (1-1) for example).
2025/05/25 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/25    

You may also be interested in these entries...
2014/1/14-2/5 [Computer/SW/Languages/C_Cplusplus] UID:54763 Activity:nil
1/14    Why is NULL defined to be "0" in C++ instead of "((void *) 0)" like in
        C?  I have some overloaded functtions where one takes an integer
        parameter and the other a pointer parameter.  When I call it with
        "NULL", the compiler matches it with the integer version instead of
        the pointer version which is a problem.  Other funny effect is that
        sizeof(NULL) is different from sizeof(myPtr).  Thanks.
	...
2013/4/9-5/18 [Computer/SW/Languages/C_Cplusplus, Computer/SW/Apps, Computer/SW/Languages/Perl] UID:54650 Activity:nil
4/04    Is there a good way to diff 2 files that consist of columns of
        floating point numbers, such that it only tells me if there's a
        difference if the numbers on a given line differ by at least a given
        ratio?  Say, 1%?
        \_ Use Excel.
           1. Open foo.txt in Excel.  It should convert all numbers to cells in
	...
2013/4/29-5/18 [Computer/SW/Languages/C_Cplusplus, Computer/SW/Compilers] UID:54665 Activity:nil
4/29    Why were C and Java designed to require "break;" statements for a
        "case" section to terminate rather than falling-through to the next
        section?  99% of the time poeple want a "case" section to terminate.
        In fact some compilers issue warning if there is no "break;" statement
        in a "case" section.  Why not just design the languages to have
        termination as the default behavior, and provide a "fallthru;"
	...
2012/7/19-11/7 [Computer/SW/Languages/C_Cplusplus] UID:54439 Activity:nil
7/19    In C or C++, how do I write the code of a function with variable
        number of parameters in order to pass the variable parameters to
        another function that also has variable number of parameters?  Thanks.
        \_ The usual way (works on gcc 3.0+, Visual Studio 2005+):
               #define foo(fmt, ...) printf(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
           The cool new way (works on gcc 4.3+):
	...
2011/3/7-4/20 [Computer/SW/Languages/C_Cplusplus] UID:54056 Activity:nil
3/7     I have a C question.  I have the following source code in two identical
        files t.c and t.cpp:
                #include <stdlib.h>
                int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
                  const char * const * p1;
                  const char * * p2;
	...
2011/2/5-19 [Computer/SW/Languages/C_Cplusplus] UID:54027 Activity:nil
2/4     random C programming/linker fu question.  If I have
        int main() { printf("%s is at this adddr %p\n", "strlen", strlen); }
        and soda's /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space is 2 (eg; on)
        why is strlen (or any other libc fn) at the same address every time?
        \_ I don't pretend to actually know the right answer to this, but
           could it have something to do with shared libraries?
	...
2010/2/12-3/9 [Computer/SW/Languages/C_Cplusplus] UID:53708 Activity:nil
2/12    I need a way to make a really big C++ executable (~200MBs) that does
        nothing.  No static initialization either.  Any ideas?
        \_ static link in lots of libraries?
        \_ #define a   i=0; i=0; i=0; i=0; i=0; i=0; i=0; i=0; i=0; i=0;
           #define b   a a a a a a a a a a
           #define c   b b b b b b b b b b
	...
2009/9/28-10/8 [Computer/SW/Languages/C_Cplusplus] UID:53409 Activity:nil
9/28    http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
        Java is #1!!! Followed by C, PHP, C++, Visual Basic, Perl,
        C#, Python, Javascript, then finally Ruby. The good news is
        Pascal is going waaaay back up!
        \_ C is still more popular than C++?  I feel much better about myself
           now.
	...
2009/8/7-14 [Computer/SW/Languages/C_Cplusplus, Computer/SW/Languages/Java] UID:53252 Activity:high
8/6     In C one can do "typedef int my_index_t;".  What's the equivalent in
        C#?  Thanks.
        \_ C#? Are you serious? Is this what the class of 2009 learn?
           \_ No.  I have to learn .NET code at work.  I am Class of '93.
           \_ python is what 2009 learns, see the motd thread about recent
              cal courses and languages
	...
2009/7/21-24 [Computer/SW/Languages/Java] UID:53168 Activity:moderate
7/20    For those who care btw, it looks like eclipse is now A Standard Tool
        at UCB ugrad cs, probably replaced emacs.  Furthermore, people get
        angry at seeing Makefiles, (since eclispe takes care of that).  I
        guess it's just a sign of the times.
        \_ The more people at my work use eclipse the less the code is
           managable in emacs.  I'm not sure which application's fault
	...