4/5 Hey I missed out on that Ghandi thing but anyway, if he really
thought peace at all costs was better than a few deaths in the
name of freedom and liberty how come he lead so many of his
own people to take actions against the British which got them
killed? What's up with that?
\_ Gandhi was not opposed to deaths, but he thought that
people should have the choice of dying for a cause, not
have that choice made form them by external agents. E.g.,
re the Jews circa WWII, he did not that that they should
accept their fate but that they should engage in incidents
of collective suicide so as to alert the world to their
plight. See Orwell on Gandhi.
\_ Gandhi was a complete ass. India would have had freedom
much earlier and on much better terms had he put aside his
own political ambitions and supported Bose and
others. Instead of doing what was best for India and her
people, he did what was best for Gandhi and relegated India
to fifty plus years of socialist poverty and despair from
which it is only now beginning to rise.
\_ 90-column freeper twink strikes again
\_ Bose was a map collaborator. He's rotting in his
smoking ruins in a jungle somewhere.
\_ He's most likely dead. Bose may have picked the
wrong sides, but he was fighting to free India
for the sake of freedom rather than for revenge.
Under Bose there would have been no partition.
\_ He's most likely dead (he would be ~ 105 yrs old
this year). Bose may have picked the wrong allies,
but at least he was fighting to free India to
establish freedom for her citizens rather than
fasting for revenge.
\_ Who's Bose? Can someone educate me? A google search
turned up mostly speakers.
\_ google. bose india independence.
\_ Subhas Chandra Bose.
\_ Is Gandhi's no violence principles successful because
the threat people like Bose poses is an unappetizing
alternative for the Brits?
of the underlying threat people like Bose poses? |