2/28 Is it a bad thing to have more than 15 partitions (counting everything
such as drivers, free space etc) on a hard drive? The system is
OS X, possibly coexisting with linuxppc, if that matters.
\_ if every partition is as large as you will need it to be for the
life of the disk, it's not a bad thing.
Do you believe that's true? -tom
\_ That is different level of badness from what I am worried about.
Some places (man page for pdisk) says there are bugs in the
Some place (man page for pdisk) says there are bugs in the
else where this is documented. However I just got a kernel
panic for unknown reason.
kernel that can't deal with > 15 partitions but I see nowhere
else where this is documented and it might be archaic (MkLinux).
However I just got a kernel panic for unknown reason.
\_ Why don't you play it safe and stay at 14 partitions?
\_ What does one need with 14 partitions? mkdir.
\_ Mount options can only be enabled on mount points,
not on subdirectories.
\_ you're being silly.
\_ and a mount point is what? a subdirectory....
\_ You can only set nodev, nosuid on partitions
mounted on a particular directory. If you
want to run some process in a chroot env,
if the fake root isn't a separate volume
you would have to disable things like nosuid
on the whole volume that the fake root dir
located on.
\_ ok, you now have a (fairly specious)
reason to have two partitions. What
possible reason is there for the other
13?
\_ I meant (and said) "physical" partitions, which include
partition map, drivers etc. On a Mac hard drive, just 7
volumes will take you to 16 partitions, somtimes 18. Any
way yes I can just mkdir. Note that there are at least 3
types of diff. fs and os on a mac/ppc system, not counting
the virtual pc, and that's some motivation to have a large
number of partitions on a large disk.
\_ no it's not. |