www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/826186/posts
It's a wonder this nutcase is even allowed to spew his garbage on the newscasts. Ref "Ritter also underwent court-ordered sex offender counseling from an Albany psychologist. This seems to be a pretty routine plea-bargain-type arrangement such as might be given a first-time violator for a -- let's face it -- not particularly earthshaking sex offense (the guy offered to show his wiener to a 16-year old temptress in an internet chat room). This event also happened some time after Scotty's big role reversal, from a thorn in the side of Saddam to the dictator's biggest shill -- a reversal which was augured by his Saddam Hussein frontman-financed movie deal in 2000, with the included all-expenses-paid trip to hobnob with the Tariq Aziz in Baghdad. Seems that Scotty's little head sometimes leads his big head astray. But I'm sure a fine upstanding gentleman like Saddam Hussein would never think of taking advantage of that fact. However, NewsChannel 13 reported in June 2001 about an arrest of a 39-year-old William Ritter of Delmar on charges he tried to lure a 16-year-old girl he met on the Internet to a Burger King in Menands. According to police, the intent of that meeting was so that she could watch him perform sexual acts on himself. What to believe: Scotty's denial, or that mugshot running on another thread? I wonder how many consider their actions actually freedom of speech rather than criminal acts, that talking dirty and salacious is not the same as actually doing an act physically. LOL 123 15 posted on 01/20/2003 3:56:52 PM PST by 124 TLBSHOW 125 Post Reply | 126 Private Reply | 127 To 12 | 128 View Replies To: doug from upland Hah! Like 142 18 posted on 01/20/2003 3:58:55 PM PST by 143 TLBSHOW 144 Post Reply | 145 Private Reply | 146 To 13 | 147 View Replies To: mombonn Scott's attorney confirms the arrest. LOL 155 20 posted on 01/20/2003 3:59:54 PM PST by 156 TLBSHOW 157 Post Reply | 158 Private Reply | 159 To 17 | 160 View Replies To: HAL9000 The date on the link is 2003 not 2002 as you have in your post. So then, Ritter took it seriously when someone told him to, "Go . LOL DU now has a link up to that capitolgrilling thread. They're upset with Doug too for not speaking highly of Will Pitt. The protesters tried to bring up Scott Ritter and all his BS. Hey, if JimRob would allow it, I would have him on my show and let him have his say. SHOW grasswire (2238 posts) Jan-20-03, 06:48 PM (ET) Is a freeper behind the smear of Scott Ritter? Hey, if JimRob would allow it, I would have him on my show and let him have his say. As the parent of a daughter (now 24) I find it QUITE a big deal. Tell me how happy you would be to have YOUR 16 year old daughter lured to watch a man over twice her age masturbate in front of her? You seem to be quite interested in telling us that it isn't. It is almost like you are afraid we will connect the dots to whoever engineered the coverup. If she shows, she can be abducted and raped or worse, and is unlikely to tell anyone because she'll get in trouble. Young girls have met their *doom* by following up on meetings like Scotts BK tryst. Doug started emailing and phoning the CNN producer, feeding all kinds of stuff about Pitt, totally discrediting him. Pitt, of course, didn't know that Doug was talking to CNN. Scotty's Scuddy Ritter Rooter 270 39 posted on 01/20/2003 4:30:43 PM PST by 271 Spunky 272 Post Reply | 273 Private Reply | 274 To 27 | 275 View Replies To: Miss Marple It ain't pedophilia and it ain't statutory rape. It's a guy talking dirty with a jail-bait agent provocateur in an internet chat room -- that's it, that's the whole thing. I find nothing extraordinary in the fact that Ritter was able to get off with a plea bargain and counseling. Your attempt to some how turn this into a giant conspiracy with Queen Hillary pulling the strings is the height of absurdity. I told him a year ago that he should have taken back his statement that Reagan sent the bombs to the Middle East through Ollie North that killed our Marines in Beirut. I suspect that CNN decided his objectivity would be in question. If he wants to be taken seriously as a writer rather than a RAT hack, perhaps he should dump the 4-letter words and hatred of Bush and Reagan. I express intense hatred of Bill and Hillary, but I never expect to be on CNN. My business is protecting buildings from terrorist bastards, not being a for profit political writer. If he wanted to be on my show, I would do a serious interview and let him get out his info. The rules would be no attacks on Clinton or Bush, no using the word Chimp or Sinkmaster, etc. Your attempt to dismiss this as inconsequential is ridiculous. I ask again, would you think this was a minor thing if YOUR daughter were lured into watching a man over twice her age masterbate? The Clintons have far more influence in Albany, New York than do the Iraqis. I am willing to entertain the thought that Saddam is involved. I have offered theories, you do nothing but mock my ideas. Why are MY theories to be discounted, when your anthrax theories are posted over and over again? You are simply deducing a conclusion based on information you have gathered. It wasn't even a crime -- except in our New World Order of "virtual" crime. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
|
http://csua.com/feed/