| ||||||
| 5/30 |
| 2002/12/17-18 [Politics/Domestic/President/Reagan, Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:26842 Activity:very high |
12/16 Ollie's Army Takes Grenada, Again
http://www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2002/45/ma_152_01.html
I can't imagine a ship I'd much rather see come down with a
Norwalk-like bug.
[deleted and restored-- guess it's not just the lefties doing
the censoring, eh?]
\_ Maybe it was deleted because it's such an obvious troll? Since
when is anything about Ollie news? Link from the center and right
that get deleted are from main stream/leftist news sources. This
is noise from motherjones for christ's sake. Hardly main stream
or unbiased. They make ABCCNNCBSNBC look right wing.
\_ gee, the freerepublic links are never obvious trolls
\_ Straw man. You're ignored what I said. I'm glad that
frereper links get killed. They're stupid. You also purge
standard main stream/leftist links.
\_ How this a "straw man?" You do know what that means, right?
\_ Sure do. Do you? How is it not? I never once said
anything about freeper crap. Freeper crap is troll
fodder and everyone here except the freeper poster would
easily agree on that. I'm talking about mainstream
links on real news items that get censored because
certain lefties don't like to see real news that doesn't
fit their world view.
\_ Aw, does the widdle right-winger not like leftie news posts?
Suck it up....
\_ I don't care. Just be aware of the difference between
propoganda and biased drivel and real news. When you figure
out the difference, you can take off your debate training
wheels and say something worth the bits required to store it.
\_ You've obviously mistaken MotherJones for a news outlet.
Mother Jones discusses and critizises and opines on the
news. They have journalists on staff and as contributors.
But I don't think anyone would be willing to claim that
they are trying to be a "fair and unbiased news source".
They embrace and trumpet their agenda far and wide.
--scotsman
\_ Exactly. Same shit as the freepers.
\_ Except that motherjones actually attempts to include
historical context and hard facts. If you had
compared to, say, the Economist, your statement might
have some weight. |
| 5/30 |
|
| www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2002/45/ma_152_01.html -> www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2002/11/ma_152_01.html EXHIBIT 29 Tanks for Tots 30 Tanks for Tots Ollie's Army Takes Grenada, Again Eager to relive the 1983 US invasion of Grenada? By Alastair Paulin 31 November/December 2002 Issue Subscribe 32 Subscribe to Must Reads Today Each Friday, we gather the best of our Mother Jones Daily web-logs into a single listing of truly "must read" articles. To celebrate the 20th anniversary of what it calls "the defeat of Soviet aggression in Grenada" and a "key to Ronald Reagan's victory in the Cold War," Oliver North's pro-military advocacy group is sponsoring a return invasion of the Caribbean on the "Freedom Cruise," setting sail from San Juan, Puerto Rico, in March 2003. Speakers such as former Attorney General Ed Meese, National Rifle Association vice president Wayne LaPierre, and the Gipper's non-ballet-dancing son, Michael Reagan, will lead the hawkish hijinks on board the MS Sea Princess. Tools 35 Email 36 E-mail article 37 Print 38 Print article Related Articles * 39 Barry & Ollie & Us * 40 Total Coverage: The CIA, Contras, and Drugs * 41 Oliver Twisted Re: Action * 42 Freedom Alliance site Backtalk * 43 E-mail the editor This article has been made possible by the 44 Foundation for National Progress, the 45 Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and 46 gifts from generous readers like you. |