10/2 http://csua.org/u/36b
"... full-time longshoremen earn an average salary of $80,000 a year,
while the most experienced foremen average $167,000."
And they still shut down all the west coast docks and tumble the
already bad economy in order to demand more.
\_ hmm, if they so importent that the can hurt the economy that
\_ hmm, if they so important that the can hurt the economy that
simply maybe the DESERVE high salaries.
\_ The work is important, the workers are not. It's grunt work.
Any high schooler with 4 hours training could do it. People who
stock grocery shelves are important, too. You think they should
get $80k starting and $167k for 'experienced' stock shelvers?
\_ The docks locked out the workers, not the other way around.
Train harder.
\_ You really buy that "we didn't slow down; we were just trying to
follow the safety procedures" crap?
\_ And you really buy the "there was an undeclared slowdown"?
\_ With average pays at $80K and $167K, why do they deserver
immunity to competition from non-union workers?
\_ Duh. Go read *anything* on the net about union tactics.
This is classic strategy. The counter punch lock out is
a new response, though. Jeeze, I know it's the motd but
if you know *nothing* about a topic, take 5 seconds to
look on google before posting and wasting all those bits.
\_ They cite the death of five workers over the previous
months. You know what? If my boss started hedging on my
contract, I'd start following all of his stupid rules too.
\_ They're OSHA rules. If all OSHA rules were followed, the
economy would collapse *and* people would die on their
job trying to follow them.
\_ You're missing the point. They don't necessarily want more money,
they want to keep their jobs. The companies want to hire nonunion
folks to handle some of the new tech going in. The new tech will
eliminate union jobs. The union want the company to put union
folks in those new jobs instead of having them laid off.
\_ With average pays at $80K and $167K in this economy (and I bet
\_ sure I'd prefer that they trained me. Hell, I'd prefer that
they paid me for doing nothing at all. But why should
they *have* to?
they get OT pay as well), why do they deserver immunity to
competition from non-union workers and layoff?
\_ Ignore the union bit for the moment. Would you prefer that
your employer trained you for new technology or just outright
hired someone else instead? okay, bring the union back into
this, they work to make sure this doesnt happen, to make sure
you are not just discarded because your employer doesnt want
to provide relevant training.
\_ sure I'd prefer that they trained me. Hell, I'd prefer
that they paid me for doing nothing at all. But why
should they *have* to?
\_ so you dont mind being disposable.
\_ He didn't say that at all. He said he'd prefer not
being disposable, in fact but doesn't see why they
should be *forced* to not dispose of him. Please
learn to read basic English. Thanks.
\_ my parents are/were both union workers, so I'm biased,
I wonder if the rest of you feel this way?
\_ That you're biased? Sure! Why not? Ok, I feel you're biased.
Happy now?
\_ I'm a union (tech) worker, but I hate the goddamned union. It's
retarded that these fat fucks can get by on their skills that havent
been updated since the DOS days and havent bothered picking up
skills that theyve been taught in training. and since we have the
same job title, we get paid the same, so i get paid the same as
lazy fat fucks.
\_ You know nothing and more nothing about this issue but it's the
motd so who cares? |