8/2 jw stop butchering the motd
\_ I'm serious. Stop it. The motd is not that anonymous. Let it be.
\_ how long of a motd (# of lines, # of topics) are you comfortable
with, before it becomes noise?
--jw, who does not want the motd to be soda's slashdot
\_ I think a more resonable strategy for motd curbing ought
involve how active a thread is. If people are still
posting to a given thread, then clobbering cuz it's
'too long' is lame. If you don't have a good or reliable
metric to determine which threads are active, then perhaps
you might conisder the possibility that it's not
appropriate for you to be assigning truncation
responsibilities to yourself. Perhaps an easier solution
is to let a given thread last at least a day or two before
nazi'ing it.
\_ we can arrange for the motd to be nazified completely
forever.
\_ So? Shit or get off the pot. No one NEEDS
motd.public. Why waste time with this sort of
statement?
\_ having followed the motd for over 5 years, i do believe
i have a solid truncation metric. it considers the
factors you mentioned, in addition to whether the
latest additions/comments are still relevant, or if
the topic has been hijacked and rendered useless.
i don't know if the OP actually paid attention to
what i have excised, or if he is simply over-reacting
to a perceived censorship. --jw
\_ Granted on most of your points. But some of the
points about hijacking and off-topic seem a little
bit subjective to me. If people are interested in
a thread (even if it has wandered far afield) it
seems a touch too close to censorship to nuke because
some third party has abritrarily deemed it
inappropriate.
\_ Becomes? |