Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 24947
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/07/08 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
7/8     

2002/5/26 [Politics/Domestic/911, Politics/Domestic/Crime] UID:24947 Activity:nil
5/25    Drugs, Russia and Terrorism
        http://www.thefinalphase.com/DouglassDrugs.htm
        Why We Didn't Listen to Golitsyn
        http://www.thefinalphase.com/ListenGolitsyn.htm
2025/07/08 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
7/8     

You may also be interested in these entries...
2012/11/18-12/18 [Recreation/Celebrity, Politics/Domestic/911, Computer/SW/Apps/Media] UID:54537 Activity:nil
11/16   Anonymous responds to be labeled a "terrorist" by Isreali media:
        http://t.co/0lIgC166
	...
2012/5/9-6/4 [Politics/Domestic/911] UID:54384 Activity:nil
5/9     If U.S. doesn't do assissination, then what do you call
        Operation Neptune Spear aka "Mission Kill Bin Laden"?
        \_ I think theoretically the difference is that the goal of one is
           "kill him/her", while the goal of the other is "capture him/her,
           and don't hestitate to shoot with the possibly of killing if he/she
           and don't hesitate to shoot with the possibly of killing if he/she
	...
2011/5/5-7/30 [Politics/Domestic/911, Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:54104 Activity:nil
5/4     So, Bin Laden, star of Fox News, dies at 51.  But really the
        question is, when are we declaring war on pakistan for
        1. harboring a known terrorist
        2. taking our money ($ billions) for "antiterror" operations?
        Clearly we got scammed here.
	...
2010/7/12-8/11 [Politics/Domestic/911, Politics/Domestic/SocialSecurity] UID:53882 Activity:low
7/12    "Debt commission leaders paint gloomy picture"
        http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_governors_debt_commission
        "... everything needs to be considered . including curtailing popular
        tax breaks, such as the home mortgage deduction, ..."
        Housing market is going to crash again?
        \_ Doubt it, not with NSFW marketing tactics like this:
	...
2010/1/4-19 [Politics/Domestic/911] UID:53611 Activity:moderate
1/4     Why the fascination with blowing up airplanes? Airports have tight
        security. It doesn't seem worth it. It's far easier to derail a
        train or set off explosives in a crowded place like a theater or
        sporting event. As many or more people will be killed and it will
        still make the news. I don't get why all of our security, and
        apprently much of the terrorist's resources, is focused on airplanes.
	...
2009/12/5-26 [Politics/Domestic/911, Recreation/Humor] UID:53568 Activity:nil
12/4    you know the 1999 ending of ST:DS9 shows the protagonists working
        as terrorists, and all worried about a police state coming for the
        federation.  Funny timing, no?
        \_ At that point in time there was a bit of sympathy people were
           starting to extend to "freedom fighters"; vis a vis all the
           popular support many pro-palestine movements were going on -
	...
2013/6/18-8/13 [Reference/Law/Court, Politics/Domestic/Crime] UID:54695 Activity:nil
6/17    Don't mess with Texas:
        http://gawker.com/woman-tells-carjacker-he-picked-wrong-witch-runs-him-513728108
        \_ Kudos.  I just worry that some shameless ambulance-chasing lawyer
           might sue her on behalf of the criminal.
           \_ America has more lawsuits per capita than any other nation.
              Lawyers, rejoice!!!
	...
2013/5/28-7/2 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China] UID:54683 Activity:nil
5/28    WTF??? Even the Defense Contractors can't do cybersecurity right?
        http://preview.tinyurl.com/o6kc3yu
	...
2013/4/10-5/18 [Politics/Domestic/Crime] UID:54651 Activity:nil
4/10    Is it just me, or it seems really ironic that a bunch of iconic
        monopolists in the Guilded Age funded a bunch of academic institutions
        through their philanthropies and those institutions later on produced
        famous academics that are highly critical of their benefactors
        and attack the ideals on which those monopolists based their
        philosophy on?
	...
2013/4/18-5/18 [Politics/Domestic/911, Politics/Domestic/SIG] UID:54660 Activity:nil
4/18    "MSNBC Host Blames NRA for 'Slow' Boston Investigation: 'In the
        Business of Helping Bombers Get Away With Their Crimes'"
        http://www.csua.org/u/zwf
        \_ The NRA has a lot to answer for.
        \_ Oh, for fuck's sake.  We don't put taggants in gunpowder because it
           interferes with the proper functioning of a round of ammuntion.
	...
2012/9/19-11/7 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Israel] UID:54480 Activity:nil
9/18    Why are so many ACCOUNTANTS Jewish? Not a troll, just curious.
        Gil. Goldberg. Levy. etc...
        \_ Perhaps b/c historically Jews (unlike Christians) were allowed
           to charge interest on loans (usury).
           \_ ok, fine. What about lawyers? I don't get that one.
              Goldberg. Ginsberg. Buergenthal. Rosenthal. Hoffman. Shapiro.
	...
2012/6/23-7/20 [Politics/Domestic/Crime] UID:54421 Activity:nil
6/23    Werher von Braun, Nazi, SS, overseer of Dora slave factory,
        is an American hero because of his contribution to
        Saturn V. What is wrong with America?
        \_ Is this worse or better than Gerald Ford pardoning
           Nixon for FuckYouAmericaGate?
        \_ "Hero" is a strong word. "Useful" would have been a
	...
Cache (8192 bytes)
www.thefinalphase.com/DouglassDrugs.htm
Additionally, we cannot wage a real war on terrorism without waging a real war on illegal drugs, because the two are closely coupled. Drug trafficking is a significant source of terrorist financing. The root of several terrorist groups is narcotics trafficking, and vice versa. The few drug traffickers who are not terrorists depend on terrorists for protection and enforcement services that are usually paid for in drugs. This is just the start of the hidden side of the war on terrorism. Its conclusions were more frightening than the 9-11 attacks. Just the money-laundering part of international organized crime revenues was estimated to be at least $900 billion, possibly exceeding $2 trillion, a year. Other studies place their gross annual revenues at $2+ trillion. Drug trafficking, with annual revenues at $500+ billion, is one of the major components of organized crime. Another component is the sale of illegal goods and arms, most of which go to terrorists and terrorist regimes. A third component is organized crime's role as an intermediary in helping terrorist groups and rogue nations acquire weapons of mass destruction. The money dimension of organized crime - its use for buying favors, corruption and compromise - is probably of greatest concern. Only a few statements from the interagency report, "International Crime Threat Assessment" (December 2000), are needed to tell the story. One Big Happy Family It is not just that terrorism feeds off drug trafficking. Rather, terrorism, drug trafficking and organized crime are one big happy family. Originally, these were independent operations that emerged in different regions and grew in an evolutionary manner. This is because in the latter half of the last century, various states (mainly Communist states that were inherently criminal and terrorist in nature) recognized the potential of these operations as revolutionary weapons. Thus they proceeded to build narcotics trafficking, organized crime and terrorism into major state intelligence operations. The three operations - trafficking, terrorism and crime - are different but complementary. They work together while striving to appear independent of each other. They do not compete with each other, but cooperate synergistically. The three have become so intertwined that war on any one of the three means war on all. In reality, this is what needs to be done - to wage war on all three. They are all unacceptable, they are all covert state intelligence attack operations, each can have dire consequences, and all need to be eradicated. The most damaging are drug trafficking and organized crime, not terrorism. Terrorism is the least damaging of the three because its main product is physical damage, in contrast to organized crime and drugs, which attack the moral basis of society and corrupt its leadership and institutions. However, because of the built-in publicity that goes along with terrorism, it is terrorism that gets the lion's share of the attention. Actually, far greater damage is done each year by organized crime and drug trafficking in terms of deaths, casualties, corruption and economic costs. Its main targets are political parties, top government officials, judges, top law firms, financial institutions, news media, investigatory/police agencies and intelligence services. As pointed out in the "International Crime Threat Assessment," the corruption and compromise achieved staggers the mind. This is a global phenomenon including corruption, compromise and complicity in the United States and in our allies as well as in the usual Middle East suspects. This phenomenon and its implications need to be understood. Our war-on-terrorism objective is to destroy terrorism around the world, in the process drawing no distinction between the terrorists and those who harbor or support them. Terrorism is critically dependent on the financial, logistic, material supply and political corruption networks that involve or overlap those of organized crime and state intelligence services. We cannot cut the terrorists' principal financial support without invading the heart and soul of organized crime: finance and money laundering. Further, organized crime has 10 times more lawyers and finance specialists than our Justice Department and FBI, and they are all much better paid, better connected and more committed. This is where the war-on-terrorism rabbit hole takes us and the end is still not in sight. Involvement of Russia and China Another critical yet overlooked facet of the terrorism problem was raised briefly during the recent Senate Intelligence Committee National Security Threat hearings. It is well known that China has been one of the biggest supporters of Middle East terrorists and rogue regimes seeking to acquire long-range missiles and weapons of mass destruction. In its former incarnation as the Soviet Union, Russia is the granddaddy of international terrorism. Today's international terrorism is fundamentally the product of Russia's military intelligence, the GRU, and to a lesser extent its civilian intelligence, the KGB. Both the KGB and GRU are alive, well and more powerful today than they were under Communism. Thus, the possible involvement of Russia and China should have been under intense CIA covert scrutiny for many years, and Sen. Consider Director Tenet's answer: "Well, sir, I would say that, first of all - and it's all separate. And at times we have distinctions between government and entities. Bayh's question, we need to go back 50 years, to the origins of today's international terrorism, narcotics trafficking and organized crime. This is not an easy subject to address because of the efforts within academia, political circles, the news media and policy centers for 80 years to keep silent about the crimes of Communism, as eloquently explained in the recent study "The Black Book of Communism" (Harvard University Press, 1999). Because of this silence, data on Communist crimes come as a shock to most people and, hence, is hard to believe. This "silence" is the cornerstone of the political protection that is largely responsible for the unprecedented growth of organized crime, drug trafficking and international terrorism over the past 50 years. This is the hardest lesson of all, and it has not been learned. That organized crime, drug trafficking and terrorism are Russian (and Chinese) STATE operations is hard for people to accept and even harder to incorporate into their thinking and planning because of the long history of political, news, and academic leadership silence respecting these crimes of Communism. How can these be state operations when our own leaders are silent about them? The implications of this question are equally troublesome. Origins of Today's Terrorism The origins of today's terrorism, drug trafficking and organized crime were experienced first-hand by the former top-level Czech Communist official, Gen. He was chief of staff to the minister of defense and was on the inside of the planning and execution of all three operations by various Communist state intelligence services, most notably the Soviet Union and its East European satellites. When Khrushchev came to power in 1954, he set about renovating the Soviet Union's global revolutionary war movement, which had stagnated under Stalin. Under Khrushchev's direction, the Soviets quickly dropped the "revolutionary war" moniker and henceforth referred to the activity as wars of "national liberation" to reflect a new deception, that these were only national liberation movements and not internationally stimulated revolutionary war operations, which is what they really were. Concurrent with this change, three new strategic intelligence operations (that is, ones of strategic importance) were adopted: international narcotics trafficking (to undermine the society and weaken its leaders), international organized crime (to corrupt the politicians and financial institutions) and international terrorism (to destabilize the countries and create revolutionary situations). Terrorism and drug trafficking were run mainly out of the GRU and organized crime was run mainly out of the KGB. The Soviets alre...
Cache (3556 bytes)
www.thefinalphase.com/ListenGolitsyn.htm
Nyquist and other analysts outside of the government, have kept Golitsyn's message and it's ramifications for the survival of Western Civilization accessible to the public. Recently, the CIA's analysis of the threats posed by Communist China to the survival of the United States was examined by an independent twelve-member commission. The commission found that: "CIA reporting on China is biased and slanted toward a benign view of the emerging communist power. In refusing to report accurately regarding Red China, the CIA has deliberately deceived the United States people by ignoring the threat. An "institutional predisposition" is a fatal flaw for an agency dedicated to the gathering, analysis and reporting of present and potential threats to the security of the United States. How does an "institutional predisposition" develop in an intelligence agency? If the institutions of a democratic republic reflect the will and morality of it's citizens, then how could the CIA be immune from "institutional predisposition"? The answer is that the CIA is not immune to the corruption and decay that has afflicted our country since the end of WWII. Money and the political influence it has bought Red China, has apparently had a powerful negative influence upon the CIA's ability to realistically evaluate the threats poised by Red China. I believe that Golitsyn fell victim, in part, to an "institutional predisposition" in the American intelligence agencies and the State Department. Golitsyn had defected during an intense period of confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union. The Bay of Pigs, the Cuban Missile Crisis, the communist onslaught on South Vietnam. The strength and forward posture of the United States nuclear capability was holding the Communists at bay, however; Golitsyn's message did not fit the "institutional predisposition" of establishing a peaceful coexistence with the Soviet Union. Government agencies, though staffed by career bureaucrats, are not immune to the political and social agendas of elected officials, their financial backers or their appointees. Golitsyn mentions several historical events that influenced the lack of credible response to his warning. Kennedy and the Watergate scandal destroyed what little momentum Golitsyn and his small group of supporters were able to gather. Another pivotal event that Golitsyn mentions as diminishing his standing was the Sino-Soviet Border Conflict. The Sino-Soviet Border Conflict was a strategic deception utilizing the expendable human assets of two totalitarian communist states. This slow "seduction" transformed our society into a weakened moral and intellectual condition. This weakening intensified, as each generation was further saturated in the layers of historical, moral and cultural deception. Our intelligence community, staffing itself with the products of this patient seduction became weakened and confused. The paramount reason that Golitsyn was ignored by the American intelligence agencies is (according to Christopher Story), that, the Western intelligence agencies had been infiltrated by the KGB and the GRU. This infiltration was a major part of the warning that Golitsyn carried to America. James Jesus Angleton believed Golitsyn and his message that the CIA had been infiltrated by the Soviets. Angleton's belief in this infiltration and his attempt to identify the Soviet spies in the CIA cost him his career. In the near future, the ongoing dismissal of Golitsyn's warning will cost us - our lives, our freedom and our nation.