|
11/23 |
2002/3/26 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:24236 Activity:very high |
3/26 I was opposed to sending European "observers" to Israel until I saw this. I've done a 180. We need to send *lots* of Europeans there. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A20300-2002Mar26.html \_ They will need guns. Lots of guns. \_ So you like seeing unarmed peace keepers killed, is that what you are saying? \_ 1) you can't keep the peace (peace keepers, yes?) if you're not armed or otherwise able to enforce 'peace' through some means. They are not 'peacekeepers', they are 'observers'. 2) no, I like seeing know-nothing meddlers get what they deserve. Don't stick your hand in boiling water if you don't want to get burned. It's generally a Good Thing(tm) when noisy powerless Europeans get re-taught the ancient lessons life has to teach. \_ I'm hoping that Isreal will be forced to prove it is a nuclear power so we can get the whole Armageddon cult mass death thing going. \_ If they weren't 1973 wouldn't have been the last time the Arabs invaded. \_ Yeah, but Sharon is nuts enough to use them on Iraq or Iran. Plus I just bought some new Nikes! \_ I was hoping the Pakistani and Indian governments would go for it so we'd have a modern example of why nuclear weapons are bad and there'd be political will to finally get rid of them globally in a real way. Unfortunately I think this would also lead to even louder and larger anti-nuclear energy protests which will make meeting our long term planetary energy needs more difficult in the coming years. --still hoping for cold fusion \_ You are a pampered suburban CS student who knows nothing about "ancient lessons life has to teach." Leave life to those with the courage and conviction to actually lead it and take your hollow nihilism back to Quake III, where it belongs. \_ Well, no, actually, you're wrong. How's that for a stupid response to your stupid statement? Now we're even. |
11/23 |
|
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A20300-2002Mar26.html References 1. |