2/26 After getting a programmable Kinesis keyboard, a <DEAD>humanscale.com<DEAD>
tray, installing (and getting trained) Dragon Naturally Speaking,
I am finally back to work. All this, paid by my company. My advice
to yall is to use your company's resource to the max -Mr. RSI No Mo
\_ Like the Enron employees?
\_ No. That was the opposite situation where the company used the
employees to the max. How exactly in your twisted little mind
did you decide this was in any way Enron related?
\_ Err ... perhaps you should read about all the parties
the employees had, all the luxury hotels they stayed
in, the free vacations given, the first class plane
tickets, the waterford crystals they get on Secretary's
Day, etc. Many of them knew the company isn't making any
money, yet they stayed and took advantage of all the
benefits.
Day, the $100 bills left on their desk, etc. Many of
them knew the company isn't making any money, yet they
stayed and took advantage of all the benefits.
\_ yeah that really cost a lot compared to the golden
parachutes.
\_ You mean the EXECUTIVES who got all that shit? The typical
employee got a paycheck and the shaft. And if you believed
everything you read you'd also know that *every* 18 year
old within 50 miles of San Jose made $35m in the 95-99 era
and no one worked and everything was a big party and we all
owned multi million dollar houses we bought in cash and
oh yeah, hey wait, none of that shit was true, it was just
resources to the max", like Mr. RSI suggested,
except that, being a small fry, Mr. RSI's max
is much less than theirs.
the morons in the press over generalizing 1 or 2 incredibly
rare stories across 500,000 people.
\_ How do you define "the company" and how do you define "the
employees"? That is the real question you are debating. I
would argue that in the case of Enron, the people doing the
coniving were the highest up exec's and thus "the company".
"The employees" all lost their retirement plans and were
screwed.
\_ Yes, but they are simply "[using their] company's
resources to the max", like what Mr. RSI suggested.
\_ Say what?
\_ boys and girls, the moral of the story is to abuse your company
before it abuses you, except of course, if you're in top
management. But usually it works the other way (Mr. fry is too
nice to use his company's resource and Mr. CEO abuses Mr fry)
\_ The moral of the story is that just because someone else is
doing something wrong, doesn't mean you should also do it.
Every criminal can use that as an excuse. When you abuse
Every criminal can use that as a lame excuse. When you abuse
your company, you are abusing your co-workers and
investors which likely include old ladies and their
retirement savings.
\_ I don't think the employer paying for this person's keyboard
and software is an abuse of the company. They're just taking
that as part of the employee's cost. It'll come out of his
next raise, current salary, next bonus, or somewhere else
eventually (his severance if they go under). Nothing is free. |