| WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ | |
 http://csua.com/feed/ | |
| ||||||
| 5/25 |
| 2001/12/10-12 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Israel] UID:23205 Activity:very high |
12/9 How come the media likes to talk about 1-2 dead Israelis but rarely
talks about thousands of Palistinians killed by Israelis gunship?
Are Palistianian lives less worthy than Israelis? -conscious jew
\_ Who has more influence in the US media? Jews or Palistinians?
\_ Who has more influence in the US media? Jews or Palestinians?
\_ Ultra Leftists.
\_ That woman, Ms. Lewinsky.
\_ Ah ha! Exactly! Jew Temptress ruins career of
pro-Palestinian President with aid from Jew controlled
anti-Palestinian right wing media!
\_ Yes.
\_ When the oppressed side has suicide bombers who say things like
death to all the jews and explode themselves in public places,
the press tends to take the oppressors side. If the Palestinian
people started to use non-violent means of protest, we might
see something different.
On a different note, I think the Israel-Palestine situation is
all about provoking the other side into doing something that
plays especially badly in the press, and claiming victimhood
while you're fucking the other side back.
\_ The Palestinians were at one point much less violent, at
least for a people who had their homeland stolen. But they
got no attention (positive or negative) until they carried
out some gruesome acts of terrorism. Israel's PR system is
enough to give any Redmond spin doctor a woody. Once they
had the ear of the international community, the Palestinians
tried peace, but Israel continuously baited them.
\_ The Palestinians tried peace? Are you intentionally ignorant?
1999. Arafat walked away from 99% of everything he had been
asking for. They gave him everything. He refused to talk
further and then called for more intifada.
\_ How much of the Right of Return was offered?
0% you mean, not 99%. This is a right guaranteed
by the UN and all signatories to the Geneva Convention.
\_ Israel offered 20k. Arafat wanted 400k. There was no
further discussion since Arafat fled the talks without
counter offering. Sorry for providing facts that don't
match your opinions.
\_ 20k != 90% 400k.
IF he offered 99%, he might as well have gone 100%...
\_ There were many other things offered and on the
table than any right of return. You're not being
honest if you look at one thing which Arafat
didn't even *try* to talk about and say it's all
Israel's fault when he got just about everything
he was asking for on every other topic. If you're
going to be intentionally intellectually dishonest
then we can stop right now, you can get the last
post and walk away thinking you're really smart.
\_ I'm not blaming Israel. I'm just saying that
99% is utter bullshit, but the 20k/400k analogy
is much more accurate.
\_ And another thing: The West Bank belonged to
Jordan. It's Jordanian land if not Israel's. If
you think it should be "returned" to anyone, it
should be "returned" to Jordan, a Palestinian
country, not Arafat, a Palestinian terrorist.
\_ All this tells me is that the Palestinians must TRAIN HARDER.
It is not an understatement to say that with each day that
Hamas, Islamic Jihad, et al. continue to exist as they are,
the Palestinian people will suffer just much more for it.
\_ You know I'm not big on Isreal BUT you have a pretty
revisionist version of history there.
\_ read this article without getting mad:
http://www.harpers.org/online/gaza_diary/?pg=1 - danh
\_ The Palestinians better stop the suicide bombing, yes?
\_ It makes me mad that people with such obvious prejudice and
bias can be published in major papers (although the NYT is known
to be heavily biased) and get taken seriously by anyone as a
reporter. Once again all the Arabs have names and faces and are
real people and the Israelis are the Evil Faceless Hordes.
This is exactly the sort of thing I was talking about earlier
concerning media bias against Israel and in favor of terrorist
suicide bombers. Yes, it makes me mad.
\_ i guess this proves soda is very diverse. I read an awful lot
of print media, and i would say in the articles I read
(I don't confine myself to reading left wing hippie rags either)
the palestinians are faceless, and the israelis are portrayed
in a more favorable light. yes no one is blameless, but i think
the article is pretty good at depicting the palestinians as living
in completely miserable economic conditions. feel free to
refute! - danh
\_ How come we always hear from the families of the suicide bombers
but never from the families of the real victims? Are Jewish victims
worth less than Muslim terrorists?
\_ I don't hear anything about families of suicide bombers.
Much more common is Palestinian police/kids getting whacked.
\_ You don't? I read several papers every day. Most of the
suicide bombings have names and interviews with the bomber's
family but the victims are just body count. What exactly
are you reading that you're unaware of this?
\_ nytimeslatimescnnwashingtonpostjpostmsnbc
okay, I should qualify what I said before to
"I hear 2x-3x more about the kids/policeman getting
whacked than the suicide bombers families."
\_ Then you're reading but not comprehending. All of
these sources do exactly as I said. In the future
(god, there's a sick thought) after a suicide
bombing in Israel see how many victim names you
get vs. the bomber and his family and see who gets
most extreme version of distorsion and pure hatred.
interviewed, if anyone. Keep track.
\_ They talk about the Jewish families in http://jpost.com
naturally. As for the U.S. outlets, they
don't usually, I admit, and say stuff like
"young people out for a good time got blown up."
\_ There is a tendency to accuse anyone with the slightest
concern for Isreali action of bias and prejudice, while
editors like William Safire of the NYT get away with the
most extreme version of distortion and pure hatred.
That the gaza diary is posed on http://harpers.org online rather
than in NYT on paper is a good example. Recently for
various reasons there is a bit more coverage for the
Palestinian plight but I suspect it will be shortlived.
I have been reading the NYT for many years and they almost
always report suide bombing of Isreal as a profound
tragedy, while only occasionally make passing mention of
the brutal oppression the people under the occupation has
to endure. Whenever they do, my Isreali friend will cry
"bias bias," and some other will cry "anti-semitic." Deep
in their heart they know there is something seriously
wrong, something contradictory to all the good liberal
and often socialist education fed to them by the Ashkenazi
labor government. But when their conscience conflicts and
challenges their country's very legitemacy of existence
and the morality of their daily life, they enter into
vehement and violent denial, just like almost anyone else
would. The Gaza diary link was posted before but removed
And yes, the Palestinians are brutal and stupid with all the
suicide bomging. If someone even tries to run Americans
out of their American dream homes, we will be sure to drop
tons of cluster, oxygen depleting, bunker busting bombs
on them. The Isreali and the Palestinians are far more
alike, both genetically and mentally, then they both like
to admit. Many researches show that most Palestinians are
not Arabs but Jews who adopted Islam. I believe if their
positions are switched they will behave exactly the same.
\_ The day I see Hamas/Islamic Jihad/PFLP renounce
Israeli armies in the earlier wars and laugh at that.
Israelis believe in strength, as exemplified by Sharon.
The Palestinians just cannot impress them with the
inefficient and ineffective method of suicide bombing
and a kill ratio that tilts heavily against themselves.
terrorist acts or rendered ineffective by Israeli,
international, or Palestinian deeds, is the day
I start feeling sympathy for the Palestinian cause.
Until then, Israel in my book can assassinate leaders
of these organizations and continue acting oppressive.
- I don't necessarily believe what I just wrote, but I
sure bet a lot of Israelis do.
\_ How much will that sympathy help them? Isrealis
think the Palestinains fled in the face of advancing
Israeli army in the earlier wars without a good fight
and they laugh at that. Israelis believe in strength,
as exemplified by Sharon. The Palestinians just cannot
impress them with the inefficient and ineffective
method of suicide bombing and a kill ratio that tilts
heavily against themselves.
\_ My friend, sympathy is the key. The world turning
a blind eye to the Palestinian cause is because
of the wasting away of a sympathy.
\_ I am far more pessimistic. I think the
Palestinian cause is a lost one. Even if the
world does not turn a blind eye, so what?
The strong one wins.
\_ What about South Africa? What about
Ireland?
\_ In South Africa the white is such an
isolated minority that unless their black
killing virus had worked, they would always
be demographically weak. And no U.S.
government will saction Isreal. As for
Ireland, I don't see it as a total victory
for IRA, whose cause is not worth much
sympathy regardless of the violence or not.
But they have proven such a headache for
GB that the latter had to make some
concession. This is an exemple in which
terrorism actually worked, to some extent
at least. By the way, the biggest backers
of the IRA is the Irish catholic community
in the U.S.
\_ You know, there has to be something wrong when the military wing
of Fatah is named "Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade"
\_ Easy enough to understand: when a Jewish settler kills a
Palestinian it is "self-defence," when a Palestinian does the
same it is "terror." When the Mossad assasinates a Palestinian
leader it is "justice," when Hamas assasinates an Isreali leader
it is "terror." When Ireali rockets blow up Palestinian homes
and civlians: "justice." Palestinian suicide bombers: "terror."
Any further questions?
\_ Yes. Where'd you get this shit? When a settler kills a
palestinian, they pick up his ass for murder charges. When the
Israeli army kills a known palestinian bombing planner, it is
self-defense. When Hamas murders an Israeli leader (who had
resigned, btw), it is murder. When Israeli rockets blow up the
buildings from which mortars are fired into Israeli civilian
areas it is self-defense. Palestinian suicide bomers blowing
up kids at the disco (no crime having bad taste in music) is
murder. Any questions?
\_ Easy enough to understand: Palestinian fanatics make an
effort to kill as many Israeli civilians as possibe; Mossad
tries to kill Palestinian fanatics. As for Jewish settlers
and Palestinian residents shooting at each other, many
wouldn't be so anti-Palestinian today if there weren't any
suicide bombers. Anyways, like I said, Israel provokes the
fanatics with settlements, erecting a police state, and acting
like oppressors in general -- its the radicals' fault if they
continue to blow themselves up in shopping areas in response.
\_ Israel cleaned *all* of the settlers out of the Sinai to
get a guaranteed peace with Egypt so we know Israel is
willing to do such a thing. The problem here is that Arafat
nor any other Palestinian leader can or will grant Israel
any sort of peace, guaranteed or otherwise. Get some real
leadership on the palestinian side that can guarantee a peace
and there'll be something to talk about.
\_ Although they lost the war, Egypt was too big for Israel
to destroy as a whole, so Israel was willing to clean the
settlers out for a peace treaty. My Isreali colleagues,
self-described "leftists", all claim they do not really
care about the settlement but want to use it as a
bargaining chip. So it seems fair that the Palestinians
have nothing but suicice bombing as *their* bargaining chip. |
| 5/25 |
|
| www.harpers.org/online/gaza_diary/?pg=1 From the premiere issue of Mainline Lady, a lifestyle magazine for female drug users in the Netherlands. From an October 28, 2002, Internet chat with European Convention chairman Valery Giscard d'Estaing, sponsored by the European Union. Participants were invited to discuss a draft of a new European constitution that was released that week. From the Media Reference Guide, a laminated card listing approved responses to journalists' questions, issued by the Pentagon to American soldiers in Afghanistan. The following slogans were submitted to the United States Air Force Academy in August 2002. The school solicited suggestions to replace one of its mottoes, "Bring Me Men," which was deemed inappropriate following the discovery that rape and sexual harassment of female cadets were endemic at the institution. |
| jpost.com -> www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/P/FrontPage/FrontPage&cid=1002116796299 MARGOT DUDKEVITCH Soldiers resumed searching for the remains of two of their comrades killed in an attack on their APC. IDF to widen Philadelphia Corridor The corridor, along the Egypt-Gaza border, is one of the most violent flashpoints in the conflict. COM STAFF Ra'ad Abu-Daher was responsible for planning suicide attacks in the Jerusalem vicinity. YAAKOV KATZ The decision-making process that led to the imprisonment of three Israeli Arabs was unflawed. COM STAFF The organization has rejected a call by Yesha to delay a rally in Tel Aviv for Gaza withdrawal. RUTHIE BLUM Adults find out that 'Parents Day is where officers show a parent what their child is being groomed for. AMOTZ ASA-EL Netanyahu has given us no reason to believe he is seriously interested in the disengagement plan. |
| harpers.org Sources Mark, I am writing you because I left a message but did not hear back. I understand that you were upset about me not calling you to ask if Topher could do our show. Since Fox executives were talking to Topher about it, I thought it was cool with you. Also, since I hadn't written it yet, I wasn't at the point of asking if it was possible to have him do it. If there is some protocol for people on Fox doing guest shots on other Fox shows, I didn't know what it was. Regardless, I'm sorry that this resulted in such a mess. If you are mad at me about this or something else from our past, please tell me. I only remember us having fun in the early nineties and it troubles me that it seems like you have a beef with me. Best regards, Judd Apatow * * * Judd, Yeah, we were friends in the early nineties. I had a pilot at MTV called "Yard Dogs" about a rock band living in Hollywood. I told you about it and you proceeded to completely rip it off, storyline and all, for the Ben Stiller show. And as an Exec Producer, we both know you have input into every sketch. As for no one seeing the show, everyone knows everything in Hollywood. Personally, I feel you've made a career out of being a sycophant to Carrey or Shandling or Roseanne, and when you weren't kissing ass you were stealing from lesser-known comics or leeching off other people's ideas ("Celtic Pride," "Cable Guy"). I noticed how outraged you were to not get a writing credit on "Cable Guy" until it came out and was panned. You may not think you're a thief, but most comics know otherwise. Love, Mark * * * Mark, Come on, we all wrote for comics at the beginning of our careers. I dropped my "Cable Guy" lawsuit not because the film got bad reviews but because I spent eighty grand on it and my lawyer told me I was going to lose. You would be upset if you rewrote the vast majority of a script and received no credit. You should call Jeff Kahn and ask him how that sketch originated. If it turned out that I didn't steal your idea would you still want me to get cancer? I swear to God that I didn't know you were mad about this. Until six weeks ago I was still referring to you as an old friend. Judd Apatow * * * Mark, It's come to my attention that you are upset with Judd Apatow about the sketch "The Grungies." I completely understand why you would have been pissed off about seeing something similar to what you were working on at the time. However, the idea for "The Grungies" and all the initial writing and rewriting came from me. I was and still am influenced by pop music, and I thought it would be funny to satirize the seriousness of the Seattle grunge music scene with the ridiculous superficiality of "The Monkees" 1960s show. I went to the University of Wisconsin at Madison and loved it. If you have any other questions don't hesitate to email me. Jeff Kahn * * * Mark, I have no interest in talking with you on the phone anymore. I know you are very successful and think that gives you the right to judge people and berate them regardless of the facts, but I have had enough of you for one day. I know it's hard to believe that your rock band TV idea, which every writer in this town has thought of at one point, was not on my mind half a year after you told it to me. Why don't you sue the guys who have that new show "How to Be a Rock Star" on the WB? Nobody has ever goofed on rock bands, not "Spinal Tap" or The Rutles or 800 "Saturday Night Live" sketches. I should have told everyone on the show, no rock band sketches, that's Brazill's area. So hold on to your hate and rage, even though it makes no sense. As for the cancer, I'll wait till you get it and then steal it from you. By the way, that joke was one of my writers', Rodney Rothman (see, I credited him). Judd * * * Judd, How appropriate that you had to use someone else's joke to take a swipe at me. Also, everyone knows how you fucked over Paul Feig on the new show. All your press mentions "your" brilliant "Freaks and Geeks," as if Feig didn't even do the series. It must have killed you when the true genius behind it got nominated for an Emmy. Is your wife still livid about someone in the neighborhood building a house just like hers? We'll never be "friends," regardless of the pussy whining from your last email. Until then, die in a fiery accident and taste your own blood. I have starred the replies if you are confused by my format. You would think someone with the lineage of "Yard Dogs" would have the intellectual acumen to pick up on that. Do you start writing episodes two weeks before they air? Let me know who thinks I am a hack so I can kiss their ass as well. When they write about "That '80s Show" I am sure they won't ever mention "That '70s Show." I wrote an entire article in the "LA Times," a cover story in the calendar, that credited Paul for his work. He went from a struggling actor to an established writer/producer over the course of a year. He is still my friend and I am very happy that he was nominated for two Emmys. I wasn't upset about his Emmy nominations, I already have enough. The certificates are so big you can only hang so many before it starts looking tacky. We'll never be "friends," regardless of the pussy whining from your last email. After you said "get cancer" did you really think I was looking to heal our relationship? I'm sure everyone who has suffered with that appreciates your sharp wit. I guess you are too busy tracking my real estate problems. It's good to see the tragedies of the past few months haven't watered down your passion. I guess if Mark Brazill doesn't go insane over stuff that makes no sense, the terrorists win. Judd Apatow This is Don't Have A Cow, Man, originally from March 2002, published Thursday, May 13, 2004. |