11/9 "FBI: Same Person Probably Wrote Anthrax Letters"
ttp://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011109/ts/attack_anthrax_fbi_dc.html
More than a whole month after anthrax letters appeared, the FBI has
finally come up with a criminal profile:
- probably an adult
- probably male
- may have worked in a lab or had a scientific background
- may have gotten vaccine or antibiotics.
A high school kid can come up with this in twenty seconds. Geez.
\_ uhhh, right. and after 20 odd years on the unabomber case,
they had a profile of an out of work airline employee with
little to no education waering sunglasses and a sweatshirt.
\_ - There are a lot more adult criminals than minor criminals. Ie.
the % of adults among criminals is higher than the % of adults
in the general population.
\_ Ok, you've had some college or maybe graduated. Let's hear your
educated reasoning that would bring one to this 20 second
conclusion.
\_ - There are a lot more adult criminals than minor criminals.
- Same argument for male.
- Having either worked in a lab or had a scientific background
makes it much easier (although not easy) to understand and
get anthrax.
- Knowing that anthrax is hazardous, it's more likely that not
FBI has said anyway. ("probably", "may".)
that (s)he's taken steps to protect himself/herself with
vaccine or antibiotics so that (s)he can stay healthy and
produce a chain of attacks.
None of these are definite conclusion, but neither was what the
FBI has said anyway ("probably", "may", "or").
\_ The difference is when the FBI says "probably" they're right
more often than your random guesswork.
\_ But according to that article, the only thing that the
FBI is near certain is that all three letters were
written by the same person. |