9/17 Ok, so basically, no one has an answer to what we should do other
than take some sort of military action? I include assasination and
elite strike force hit-squad activity as military action and doing
anything to oust a foreign government as a form of pseudo-military
action as well. I'm honestly surprised the motd is so pro-war.
\_ I wonder, given how badass the US is at cryptography, about
mounting a massive cypher attack with the intent of identifying
bin Laden's bank accounts and freezing them. This would be
very illegal but perhaps a good use of the NSA and its talent.
--ulysses
\_ Hit squads are NOT military action. such things don't endanger
the general population, nor do they put large numbers of troops
at risk. Not that I'm advocating either way. I'd like us to commit
thousands of troops unilaterally to fighting any and all countries
where Osama could be, as long as it's not a big scary country like
China or Russia.
very illegal but perhaps a good use of the NSA and its talent.
--ulysses
\_ Hit squads are NOT military action. such things don't endanger
the general population, nor do they put large numbers of troops
at risk. Not that I'm advocating either way.
\_ I stand corrected. I shall clarify. Rather than "military"
let me use the phrase, "non-violent". Taken that way, what I
said still stands.
\_ With the support of some Muslim allies, destroy the Taliban and
Al Qaeda from the face of the earth. Restore the exiled king
Al Qaeda from the face of the earth. Restore exiled king
as head of a Constitutional monarchy and rebuild Afghanastan
as we did in Japan and Germany after WWII.
\_ I like this idea too, but I think it would be costly. We
must be prepared to suffer some losses. However, I do not
think the Taliban had the support of the people the way
Ho Chi Minh does. The Taliban are more like the Khmer
Rouge butchers when the Vietnamese invaded.
\_ potential, but doesn't this remind some of the Bay of Pigs?
\_ a political solution
\_ I like this idea too. |