9/3 Vote to log the motd to identify motd nukers and people who
discussion as a routine cleanup, but you happened to have posted
i guess isn't necessarily to reprimand but to make sure your
fuckup can be reversed.
anonymity, which is essential (IMHO). I think that the auto
most of the folks having this discussion haven't been to a
\_ Doesn't look very ruined to me. I've seen the CSUA's books.
a bigger mail quota." Not much charity there. I've seen
\_ I've never heard a request for alumni to give talks.
any further info. The last time I wanted to donate,
I'd love to help out. ----ranga
\_ no.
\_ How about a automatic archiving system? It could create a
web page with the motd contents every five minutes or so
(depending on the rate of changes). Pages older than a week
could get deleted automatically. It seems like this could
preserve the anonymous nature while preventing the periodic
automated nuking.
\_ i agree with this almost totally. what i really want is
an undo system so that when some dubass fucks up the
motd by repeating some post 10 times or nuking an
active thread, i can undo his action. it would make me
happy if the motd got prcs'ed and i could run diffs against
happy if the motd got prcs'ed and i could run diffs
against
it easily. the side effect however is that some people might
get identified.
\_ I have been RCS'ing the motd on my own for years now.
Shouldn't be too hard to make restoral scripts. -ERic
\_ What's the best way to do this? Does this involve a
script running in screen? I'm a unix dope.
\_ I have a question about what constitutes a "wrongful deletion".
Suppose the motd is several hundred lines long with a discussion
near the end that is several days old. I happen to delete this
discussion as a routine cleanup, but you happened to have posted
to the thread just a few minutes before. I didn't intend to censor
your post on purpose, but you don't know that, so I would get lumped
in with the motd hozers right?
\_ i think what you're saying gets solved by logging. the point
i guess isn't necessarily to reprimand but to make sure your
fuckup can be reversed.
\_ The problem with logging is that it doesn't allow for
anonymity, which is essential (IMHO). I think that the auto
archiving + undo feature mentioned above would be the way
to go.
\_ Why are voting on this? You have no authority to enforce it,
most of the folks having this discussion haven't been to a
politburo meeting in YEARS, and haven't been eligible for longer!
\_ because i'd like to know what other people think.
\_ Some of us have donated and will continue to donate money
and hardware to the CSUA. We like this forum and don't want
to see it ruined.
\_ Doesn't look very ruined to me. I've seen the CSUA's books.
Not that many people are donating. Usually when someone does
make a donation, it's along the lines of "My mail spool
filled up so I'm going to donate a hard disk so I can have
a bigger mail quota." Not much charity there. I've seen
how pathetic the responses are when the politburo asks
Alumni to come back and give talks. I'm not saying all the
alums out there are this apathetic, but a lot sure want
to have a lot of say in how soda (and the CSUA for that
matter) is run without contributing much.
\_ I've never heard a request for alumni to give talks.
I would have done so if I knew about it.
\_ I have always been willing to speak and donate. I
volunteered for the Startup panel but never recieved
any further info. The last time I wanted to donate,
the current set of hardware had already been purchased
and I was told that when more was needed someone would
email me. If more hardware is needed please contact me,
I'd love to help out. ----ranga
\_ the csua is in much better shape today than it was 4 years
ago financially. less need for ask for alumni donations
\_ isn't posting to motd a waste of time anywayz?
\_ no. |