7/16 Did the motd-nukers go on vacation? Retention seems up since last week.
\_ Wait a second... was it really Paolo?
\_ defcon. http://www.defcon.org
\_ paolo was caught deleting the motd every 3 minutes; he's laying
low for now.
\_ Paolo is a moron. Paolo's reasoning: if people delete stupid
shit like kinneydrivel, then I will delete EVERYTHING.
Typical commissar thinking.
\_ Didn't you see my constant nuclear warfare on KinneyDrivel(tm)
earlier today? i think you can still feel the fallout.
\_ how did you guys know they were by kinney? he doesn't sign
them. i can now identify this kinneydrivel on sight but i
wouldn't have known who wrote it.
\_ It's kinney.
\_ I know this has been covered before, but why are kinney's
posts deleted? Is it length or content? I personally don't
like the posts attributed to him as they are quite long,
but I just skip past them. Deleting them seems quite harsh,
unfairly abriding kinney's first amendment rights.
\_ You seem a little confused. First amendment does not apply
to WORLD WRITABLE FILES.
\_ its the principle of the thing. if you wish to have
they you should not engage in censorship either.
access to a medium of free and uncensored expression,
then you should not engage in censorship either.
do unto others and all that.
\_ The definition of censorship is very broad, it means
'deleting parts of something.' Proofreading would fall
under that definition too. I prefer to think of deleting
kinneydrivel as proofreading the motd (proofreading for
semantics is as important as proofreading for syntax
and spelling errors).
\_ It's not only semantics, it's community standards.
interesting to anyone except paolo. It's just not
MOTD posts tend to be conversational, less than 10
lines. kinneydrivel is lecture, 20+ lines, not
appropriate for the forum. -tom
\_ I feel obligated to say something about Tom
Holub, because, as the Talmud says, "Silence is
akin to assent." As this post will make clear,
Tom truly believes that he can make my stomach turn
and get away with it. It is just such wrongheaded,
nasty megalomania, mindless egoism, and intellectual
aberrancy that stirs Tom to let advanced weaponry
fall into the hands of repressive New Age bottom-
feeders. It may be soothing and pleasant for him to
think that all major world powers are controlled by
a covert group of "insiders", but his politics
always follow the same pattern. He puts the desired
twist on the actual facts, ignores inconvenient
facts, and invents as many new "facts" as necessary
to convince us that he would sooner give up money,
fame, power, and happiness than perform a brain-
damaged act. Even if I agreed that Tom's hopeless,
testy editorials were of paramount importance, it
would still be the case that I resent being exposed
to disaffected hell-raisers. Do I blame society for
this? No, I blame Tom. While this letter hasn't
provided anything in the way of a concrete plan of
action, it may help us focus our thinking a little
better when we do work out a plan. For now, we must
investigate Mr. Tom Holub's intemperate principles,
ideals, and objectives. I, hardheaded cynic that I
am, will certainly be happy to have your help in
this endeavor.
\_ Did anyone bother to read this?
\_ yes. it wasn't worth it. -mice
\_ this is a self-policed anarchy. i think most of us don't want
long, badly-formatted, rambling drivel on the motd. as others
have said, the signal to noise ratio is pretty low for him.
i wouldn't delete them, myself. but it's not just him, anytime
someone rambles on excessively they get de-
\_ people don't read the motd for SNR or useful technical data.
I read it for entertainment, and the shitheads who keep
deleting anything remotely funny are just that:
shitheads. |