|
5/25 |
2001/4/27-29 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China] UID:21124 Activity:very high |
4/27 Cubans on Cuba, Castro, and his people. http://www.nationalreview.com/nr_comment/nr_comment042601a.shtml I post this because I liked the point about 'freedom vs physical/other well being' about halfway down. \_ nationalreview. Now there is a good impartial source. \_ It's an opinion piece dumbshit. Back to English 1A for you. This isn't a news article. It is *supposed* to be partial. Use the tiny shred of brains God put in your thick skull to have been involved in instituting death squads in Chile. figure out some basics before posting. \_ This article is idiotic. The same line of reasoning leads one to conclude that "the US is a great place which affords many people the ability to live well, but this is irrelevant because we were involved in instituting death squads in Chile." \_ What death squads in Chile? \_ in the '70's. Read up on what happened under Pinochet. \_ Commie alert... Get the fuck out of the USA if you dont like it. Maybe Red China would suit your fancy. \_ join the army and get the fuck out of berkeley you redneck. \_ So now liberals equate patriotism with being a redneck. This country is fucked and we have people like you to thank for it. Its simple: communism, socialism and facism, in any form, are evil. US foreign policy is predicated on this doctrine. I'm sorry if you do not understand this, maybe one day you will. doctrine. I'm sorry if you do not understand this, maybe one day you will. \_ Bzzt. Thank you for playing. -actual veteran \_ One more thing - only the lowest of scum would disparage a military that fought with the lives of its soldiers for the freedoms you so frivolously enjoy. \_ When did berkeley seceed from the union? If you don't freedom and prosperity GTF out of the US of A and go live in a that 3rd world COMMIE ghetto called CHINA. \_ Sorry, let me clarify -- This line of reasoning leads one to conclude that "the fact that the US affords many people a high standard of living is irrelevant because we were involved insitituting death squads in Chile." I wasn't Look at their GDP (absolute or PPP). \_ how do you know? i might be in chile right now. expression my beliefs -- i was showing the absurdity of the logic in the article above. \_ Logic flaw: we're not in Chile. Thanks for playing. \_ The reality is material well being is very difficult to achieve. In the last hundred and fifty years, the only non-western countries that attained it were Japan, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Hong Kong and Singapore are little cities, and Hong Kong isn't even a country. All three attained it under non-democratic governments. The truth is being close \_ what about Taiwan? \_ Taiwan and South Korea are close, but not there yet. Look at their GDP (absolute or PPP). They are and have been close friends with the west for quite some time, much longer than they have been democracies. friends with the developed west is a prerequisite for attaining material well-being. Being democratic and free is not a prerequisite. |
5/25 |
|
www.nationalreview.com/nr_comment/nr_comment042601a.shtml I find the secretary's words alarming and repugnant, but they did provoke a memory. The year was 1986 (or thereabouts), and the place was Harvard's Kennedy School of Government. The speaker, at a student forum, was Armando Valladares, the great Cuban dissident. Everything that is important to know vital to know about Castro's rule on Cuba is in that book. They echoed the standard propaganda line, learned from their teachers, the New York Times, and so on. He said it gently, earnestly, yearning for the students to understand. Without forbidding them to speak freely, without forbidding them to worship, without forbidding them to vote and have a normal political life and pursue their own destinies, and so on? Why is material well-being not that Cuba has it, or anything remotely like it but why is material well-being incompatible with freedom? Or not even with freedom: with the absence of a stifling, horrid dictatorship? I doubt that Valladares moved very many of those people. But every time I hear the phrase "Castro has done some good things for his people," I wince. Sure, Powell doesn't embrace and adore Castro, as Congressman Serrano does, as Congressman Charlie Rangel does, as Congresswoman Maxine Waters does, along with many others. But he should realize what he gives away when he repeats those words. I am haunted by something another congressman Lincoln Diaz-Balart of Florida said last year, or the year before. It came to me strongly the other day, when the movie star Kevin Costner had a love session with Castro, down in Havana. Fidel Castro has done nothing for "his people" but immiserate, propagandize, exile, imprison, or kill them. |