1/1     One man beaten to death.  Another beaten.  Two victims that might be
        well today if only they could have defended themselves....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20010102/aponline093006_000.htm
        \_ you misspelled, "one victim that might be dead if he was stupid
           enough to be carrying a firearm"
                \_ Nope, got it just right.  Try again with a dictionary in
                   hand.  The way you spell it, someone would be dead if they
                   had a firearm.  Uhm, they didn't and they're _dead_.  Work
                   on that spelling thing a bit more, eh?
        \_ be wary of ideological thinking. if each of you could choose
           your own society, how would you have it? would every psycho be
           given guns, artillery, tanks? where would you stop it, if at
           \_ I don't care about the other psychos, as long as I have
              guns, artillery, tanks.  -John
           all, and why? likewise, in society where guns were prohibited,
           would anything possibly used as a weapon be prohibited? thinking
           in these all inclusive terms -- such as  dictating how "everyone
           should be/shouldn't be allowed" -- will not bring us to a
           solution.
           \_ gah. learn to format.
              Anyways, it all has to start with an accurate lie detector.