12/20 just out of curiosity, how many people at berkeley give a rats ass
about grad student unionization one way or the other?
-alum
\_ unions suck. ban unionization.
\_ onions suck. ban onionization.
\_ It's stupid. Grad students striking only hurts undergrads. They
don't strike from their own classes or research.
\_ How else do you propose they improve their working
conditions? Talk at the UC a lot? Well, that hasn't
conditions? Talk at the UC a lot? Well, that hasn't
worked or there wouldn't be a onion. Teaching is many
worked or there wouldn't be a union. Teaching is many
student's only realistic means of support during
gradschool, and they deserve decent compensation
and reasonable working conditions. If you knew the
\_ has the berkeley grad student union pulled in people who
egregious dirty tricks that the UC has played on grad
student instructors you'd support their strikes instead
of feeling sorry for the undergrads.
\_ "many students"is the key phrase here. As an engineering
\_ has the berkeley grad student onion pulled in people who
don't teach? i go to another school now as a grad student, and
have noe intention of teaching, and am constantly pestered
by the onion people. as far as i can tell, the "movement" is
a political power play by the large international onion who is
grad student I make a very comfortable living wage from
my stipend for doing work i love that leads to a
financially valuaeble degree, and has flexible hours.
If the TA's from the humanities departments who are
being taken advantage of came to me and said "we have
a problem, and we would like your support in our cause,"
i might have sympathy. instead they lie and say that
they want to "make the engineering department a better
place"and such to trick us into joining. as far as i
can tell, the only people who would really benefit are
those who are paying for it: the union bosses on the
outside who think grad student unionization is a good
way to get their numbers up. i go to a private school
though. i was wondingering if people at berkeley feel
the same way about UAW that i feel about
HERE, the people sponsoring our unions effort.
[fixed most major spelling errors. -motd spelling god]
\_ Striking isn't it. As an alum who suffered through one
of those ridiculous strikes years ago I could give a damn
about the grad students. The undergrads suffered. The
University didn't suffer a bit. The profs didn't. The
grad students sure as hell didn't. They were trying
hard to get undergrads to boycott classes but they
didn't boycott their own. What a total crock. Grad
student strikes do *nothing* towards improving grad
student working conditions. I do not support them in any
way. When the grad students do a *real* walkout on their
own classes and their own research for their own profs
that they work for on a daily basis then they might get
some sympathy but the phony strikes don't cut it. They
can bite me. Actually I was around for several of these
_fake_ grad student strikes. Just a bunch of
hypocritical noise. I did what my graduate instructors
did, not what they said to do. I went to class.
\_ You miss the point, grad students want to be doing their
research, it is the most important part of being a
graduate student and is essential to advancing their
career and education. Grad students might want to be
taking classes, it is often neccessary to meet class
requirements to graduate, and classes can be useful, and
fun. Graduate students rarely want to be teaching a
\_It's all controlled by the mob. Teamsters have nothing to do with
higher education. Ban the unions.
classes, it is not what they came to gradschool to do.
The fact that graduate students in less fortunate fields
need to spend so much time teaching classes sucks, it is
a waste of time for them and they do not recieve anything
near the compensation that their level of education would
imply in "The Real World" (tm). Perhaps striking is an
ineffective way for graduate students to get their
grieveness addressed, but, I do think they have some
legitimate complaints which should be addressed. With
respect to the impact that these strikes have on
undergrads, yes, we do suffer. But guess what, undergrad
instruction at Cal is nothing to write home about anyway,
a fair number of our professors couldn't teach their way
out of a cardboard box, our classes are absurdly over
crowded, and at least in computer science, the amount
of money we get for instructional is laughable. A few
grad students walking out isn't exactly going to ruin
an otherwise unblesmished record.
\_ So you're saying that since undergrad education at
Cal already sucks, grad students should go ahead and
feel free to strike as they're not hurting anyone
anyway? If the strike is ineffective, then why do
it? I don't know where you get the idea undergrads
aren't hurt. Just about everyone I knew at the time
hated the grad student strike and got fucked pretty
badly during finals. And no I don't have any
sympathy whatsoever for the poor dears who became
grad students. Teaching for dirt wages is part of
the deal. It wasn't a secret and they can go get a
new career with that Real World Salary anytime they
want. Pretty much just boo fucking hoo.
\_ has the berkeley grad student union pulled in people who
don't teach? i go to another school now as a grad student, and
have noe intention of teaching, and am constantly pestered
by the union people. as far as i can tell, the "movement" is
a political power play by the large international union who is
sponsoring the whole thing here. does this pretty much describe
the suituation with UAW and UC grad students?
\_ Your ass has been formatted. -motd formatting god
\_ It's all controlled by the mob. Teamsters have nothing to
do with higher education. Ban the unions.
\_ no. destroy the mob. |