12/15 Pros and Cons of both MP3 vs. *.wma format.
\_ yes: please explain the pros and cons of the MP3 and WMA formats
\_ Ok. Mp3 is kewl. WMA is unknown to the public.
\_ as far as I know (which isn't much) :
mp3: pro: ubiquitous, a de-facto standard
con: closed, patented
wma: pro: better compression than mp3, more support from
recording industry
con: Microsoft format, closed(?), annoying copy
protection stuff, less widely used
If you're going to stray away from mp3, you probably might as
well go with Ogg Vorbis or something. <shrug>
\- is anyone familiar with PAC [perceuptual audio
coding] from bell labs? does anything use it?
ok tnx. --psb
\_ Yes, there are pros and cons to each. I'm sorry, are you asking
a question?
\_ fuck off moron
\_ is it that difficult for Berkeley students to learn how to ask
a fucking question properly? jesus, I would think that they
at least could use complete sentences.
\_ yes: please explain the pros and cons of the MP3 and WMA formats
\_ Ok. Mp3 is kewl. WMA is unknown to the public.
\_ as far as I know (which isn't much) :
mp3: pro: ubiquitous, a de-facto standard
con: closed
con: closed, patented
wma: pro: better compression than mp3, more support from
recording industry
con: Microsoft format, closed(?), annoying copy
protection stuff, less widely used
If you're going to stray away from mp3, you probably might as
well go with Ogg Vorbis or something. <shrug>
\- is anyone familiar with PAC [perceuptual audio
coding] from bell labs? does anything use it?
ok tnx. --psb |